Autor(es):
Delgado, António H. S. ; Sauro, Salvatore ; Lima, Adriano F. ; Loguercio, Alessandro D. ; Bona, Alvaro Della ; Mazzoni, Annalisa ; Collares, Fabricio Mezzomo ; Staxrud, Frode ; Ferracane, Jack ; Tsoi, James ; Amato, Julia ; Neuhaus, Klaus W. ; Ceballos, Laura ; Breschi, Lorenzo ; Hannig, Matthias ; Melo, Mary Anne ; Özcan, Mutlu ; Scotti, Nicola ; Opdam, Niek ; Yamaguchi, Satoshi ; Paris, Sebastian ; Turkun, Lezize Sebnem ; Doméjean, Sophie ; Rosa, Vinicius ; Palin, William ; Schwendicke, Falk
Data: 2022
Identificador Persistente: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/60095
Origem: Egas Moniz - Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, CRL
Assunto(s): Bias; Biomedical and dental materials; Dental materials; In vitro techniques; Laboratory studies; Risk assessment; Systematic review
Descrição
Objectives: To develop a risk of bias tool for pre-clinical dental materials research studies that aims to support reporting of future investigations and improve assessment in systematic reviews. Methods: A four-stage process following EQUATOR network recommendations was followed, which included project launch, literature review, Delphi process and the tool finalization. With the support of the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry (EFCD) and the Dental Materials Group of the International Association for Dental Research (DMG-IADR), a total of 26 expert stakeholders were included in the development and Delphi vote of the initial proposal. The proposal was built using data gathered from the literature review stage. During this stage, recent systematic reviews featuring dental materials research, and risk of bias tools found in the literature were comprehensively scanned for bias sources. The experts thus reached a consensus for the items, domains and judgement related to the tool, allowing a detailed guide for each item and corresponding signalling questions. Results: The tool features nine items in total, spread between 4 domains, pertaining to the following types of bias: bias related to planning and allocation (D1), specimen preparation (D2), outcome assessment (D3) and data treatment and outcome reporting (D4). RoBDEMAT, as presented, features signalling questions and a guide that can be used for RoB judgement. Its use as a checklist is preferred over a final summary score. Conclusion: RoBDEMAT is the first risk of bias tool for pre-clinical dental materials research, supported and developed by a broad group of expert stakeholders in the field, validating its future use.
