Author(s): Gomes, M. Gabriela M. ; Barreto, Maurício L. ; Glaziou, Philippe ; Medley, Graham F. ; Rodrigues, Laura C. ; Wallinga, Jacco, et al. ; Gomes, M. Gabriela M. ; Barreto, Maurício L. ; Glaziou, Philippe ; Medley, Graham F. ; Rodrigues, Laura C. ; Wallinga, Jacco, et al.
Date: 2017
Origin: Oasisbr
Subject(s): Tuberculosis; Heterogeneity; Cohort selection; Social inequality; Intervention impact
Submitted by Maria Creuza Silva (mariakreuza@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-06-06T12:13:40Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Mauricio Barreto. End Tb...2016.pdf: 493856 bytes, checksum: 5abb74442d6cf1940ecfc3156bca1989 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-06T12:13:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Mauricio Barreto. End Tb...2016.pdf: 493856 bytes, checksum: 5abb74442d6cf1940ecfc3156bca1989 (MD5)
Background: Diseases occur in populations whose individuals differ in essential characteristics, such as exposure to the causative agent, susceptibility given exposure, and infectiousness upon infection in the case of infectious diseases. Discussion: Concepts developed in demography more than 30 years ago assert that variability between individuals affects substantially the estimation of overall population risk from disease incidence data. Methods that ignore individual heterogeneity tend to underestimate overall risk and lead to overoptimistic expectations for control. Concerned that this phenomenon is frequently overlooked in epidemiology, here we feature its significance for interpreting global data on human tuberculosis and predicting the impact of control measures. Summary: We show that population-wide interventions have the greatest impact in populations where all individuals face an equal risk. Lowering variability in risk has great potential to increase the impact of interventions. Reducing inequality, therefore, empowers health interventions, which in turn improves health, further reducing inequality, in a virtuous circle.
London
