A socio-historical approach to policy analysis: the case of the Brazilian Workers’ Food Policy.

• Autor(es): Souza, Jamacy Costa ; Silva, Ligia Maria Vieira da ; Pinell, Patrice
• Data: 2019
• Origem: Oasisbr
• Assunto(s): Occupational Health Policy; Nutrition Programs; Food Services; Sociology
• Tipo de Documento: Artigo científico
• Idioma: Inglês

Descrição

Submitted by Maria Creuza Silva ([e-mail]) on 2019-05-09T19:05:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Artigo Ligia Vieira 2018.pdf: 677820 bytes, checksum: 80b6622aec0db2c49c03463683beb0ca (MD5)

Approved for entry into archive by Maria Creuza Silva ([e-mail]) on 2019-05-20T18:14:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Artigo Ligia Vieira 2018.pdf: 677820 bytes, checksum: 80b6622aec0db2c49c03463683beb0ca (MD5)

Made available in DSpace on 2019-05-20T18:14:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Artigo Ligia Vieira 2018.pdf: 677820 bytes, checksum: 80b6622aec0db2c49c03463683beb0ca (MD5)

Policy analyses based on traditional or structuralist definitions of the state are important, but they have some limitations for explaining processes related to policymaking, implementation, and results. Bourdieusian sociology links the analysis to objective and subjective dimensions of social practices and can help elucidate these phenomena. This article provides such empirical evidence by analyzing the social genesis of a Brazilian policy that currently serves 18 million workers and was established by the state in 1976 through the Fiscal Incentives Program for Workers’ Nutrition (PIFAT/PAT). The study linked the analysis of the trajectory of social agents involved in the policy’s formulation to the historical conditions that allowed the policy to exist in the first place. Although the literature treats the policy as a workers’ food program (PAT), the current study showed that it actually represented a new model for paying financial subsidies to companies that provided food to their employees, meanwhile upgrading the commercial market for collective meals. The study further showed that the program emerged as an administrative policy, but linked to economic agents. The program became a specific social space in which issues related to workers’ nutrition became secondary, but useful for disguising what had been an explicit side of its genesis, namely its essentially fiscal nature.

Rio de Janeiro