Autor(es): Rodrigues, Gonçalo C. ; Braga, Ricardo
Data: 2021
Identificador Persistente: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/21924
Origem: Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
Assunto(s): reference evapotranspiration; FAO Penman Monteith; Hargreaves–Samani; temperature based ET methods; irrigation scheduling; hot summer Mediterranean climate
The FAO-56 Penman–Monteith (PM) equation is regarded as the most accurate equation to estimate reference evapotranspiration (ETo). However, it requires a broad range of data that may not be available or of reasonable quality. In this study, nine temperature-based methods were assessed for ETo estimation during the irrigation at fourteen locations distributed through a hot-summer Mediterranean climate region of Alentejo, Southern Portugal. Additionally, for each location, the Hargreaves–Samani radiation adjustment coefficient (kRs) was calibrated and validated to evaluate the appropriateness of using the standard value, creating a locally adjusted Hargreaves–Samani (HS) equation. The accuracy of each method was evaluated by statistically comparing their results with those obtained by PM. Results show that the calibration of the kRs, a locally adjusted HS method can be used to estimate daily ETo acceptably well, with RMSE lower than 0.88 mm day−1, an estimation error lower than 4% and a R2 higher than 0.69, proving to be the most accurate model for 8 (out of 14) locations. A modified Hargreaves–Samani method also performed acceptably for 4 locations, with a RMSE of 0.72–0.84 mm day−1, a slope varying from 0.95 to 1.01 and a R2 higher than 0.78. One can conclude that, when weather data is missing, a calibrated HS equation is adequate to estimate ETo during the irrigation season
