Author(s): Rodrigues, Hugo Emanuel Vaz Ferreira Resende ; Pocinho, Margarida (Orientadora)
Date: 2016
Origin: Repositório Aberto do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga
Subject(s): Resili?ncia - Resilience; RMH22 - RMH22; Validade - Validity; Fidedignidade - Reliability; Psicometria - Psychometry
O objetivo principal deste estudo visa conhecer as caracter?sticas psicom?tricas da Escala Resilience Mental Help (RMH22). A RMH22 avalia a resili?ncia na popula??o cl?nica e n?o cl?nica, e foi elaborada por Margarida Pocinho e Hugo Vaz em 2015. A escala ? constitu?da por 22 itens e as respostas devem ser determinadas pela forma como a pessoa pensa que teria reagido ou ir? reagir. A recolha da amostra cl?nica (presencial) decorreu na Funda??o, Assist?ncia, Desenvolvimento e Forma??o Profissional, a online, no facebook e noutras redes sociais, com recurso a formul?rio do google drive, ambas decorreram de 15 de novembro 2015 a 26 de maio de 2016. A amostra ficou constitu?da por 565 participantes que cumpriram o crit?rio de inclus?o da resposta a totalidade do RMH22, destes 53% eram mulheres e 47% homens. A an?lise fatorial explorat?ria da RMH22 revelou uma estrutura id?ntica ao original, que fora constru?da com base em sete dom?nios e reagrupada em recursos externos e internos Quanto ? consist?ncia interna, mostrou-se elevada (? 0,8), n?o se verificando diferen?as entre os grupos, apesar de ser superior na popula??o cl?nica. Para avaliar a consist?ncia temporal aplic?mos o instrumento, duas vezes, a uma amostra de 17 indiv?duos, com um intervalo m?dio de 90 dias. A RMH22 apresentou uma elevada consist?ncia temporal, demonstrando aus?ncia de diferen?as significativas entre as duas aplica??es (p> 0,05). O teste de ajustamento Model Goodness of Fit demonstrou que a RMH22 ? fidedigna em ambas as formas uma vez que obteve um ? > 0,7 sem diferen?as estatisticamente significativas entre os resultados das duas aplica??es. A RMH22 apresenta boas qualidades psicom?tricas sendo adaptada as popula??es testadas, embora seja mais consistente na popula??o cl?nica. A an?lise apresentou uma RMH22 com alto grau de unidimensionalidade (GFI=0,83) onde facetas espec?ficas n?o contribu?ram apenas informa??es redundantes, al?m do fator geral. Assim, consider?mos que para avaliar a resili?ncia seria mais conveniente utilizar um ?nico score, que partisse do somat?rio das pontua??es dos 22 itens da escala. O valor do RMR encontrado refor?a a interpreta??o de bom ajuste do modelo uma vez que ? inferior a 0,1 (RMR=0,008) o que ? considerado de uma forma geral adequado (quanto mais alta for a m?dia pior o ajustamento). Os resultados revelaram um ponto de corte de 18 crit?rios positivos, como valor para um indiv?duo resiliente a todos os n?veis. / The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the of the Mental Help Resilience Scale (RMH22). The RMH22 assess resilience in clinical and non-clinical population, and has been developed by Margarida Pocinho and Hugo Vaz in 2015. This scale has 22 items and the answers should be determined by the way people thinks they would have reacted, or will be reacting. The clinical sample (face to face) was held at the Foundation ADFP. The online sample, was allocated in Facebook and others social networks, using google drive form. Both took place from 15 November 2015 to 26 May 2016. The sample consisted of 565 participants (53% were women and 47% men) who has fulfilled the entire RMH22. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that RMH22 has identical structure of the original, which was built on seven areas and regrouped into external and internal resources. The internal consistency, was high (? 0.8) and there were no differences between the groups, but its greater in clinical population than the others. For test-retest reliability we specified a retest period of 90 days, with 17 subjects. The RMH22 show no significant differences between the two administration (p> 0.05), and demonstrated a good correlation between the two moments (?>0.8). The test Model Goodness of Fit showed that RMH22 is reliable in both forms since obtained ? > 0.7 with no statistically significant differences between the results of two applications. The RMH22 has good psychometric qualities for the populations tested, although it is more consistent in clinical population. The structured equation model analysis showed a RMH22 with a high degree of fit (GFI=0.83). So, we believe that to evaluate the resilience would be better use a single score (sum of 22 items of the scale). The value of the RMR reinforce the interpretation of good model fit, since it is less than 0.1 (RMR = 0.008), which is considered an adequate fit (higher value means worse average adjustment). The results revealed a cut-off point of 18 positive events responses, for a resilient person.
