15 documents found, page 1 of 2
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, stearic acid, CAS Registry Number ...
Bruze, M
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 3-phenylpropionic acid, CAS Regist...
Bruze, M
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, isobutyl propionate, CAS Registry ...
Bruze, M
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, cis-3-octenyl propionate, CAS Regi...
Bruze, M
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4-pentenoic acid, 2-acetyl-4-methy...
Bruze, M
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isoamyl butyrate, CAS Registry Num...
Bruze, M
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, menthyl acetate (isomer unspecifie...
Bruze, M
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, linalyl cinnamate, CAS Registry Nu...
Bruze, M
Development of a clinical score system for the diagnosis of photoallergic conta...
Cazzaniga, S; Lecchi, S; Bruze, M; Chosidow, O; Diepgen, T; Gonçalo, M; Hercogova, J; Pigatto, PD; Naldi, LBACKGROUND: Photoallergic contact dermatitis (PACD) is an uncommon condition, and there is a lack of validated criteria for its diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To identify a set of relevant criteria to be considered when suspecting a diagnosis of PACD and to assess the reproducibility of these criteria. METHODS: This was a diagnostic item selection and reliability study performed between July 2012 and October 2012. A pan...
Patch testing with 2.0% (0.60 mg/cm2) formaldehyde instead of 1.0% (0.30 mg/cm2...
Pontén, A; Aalto-Korte, K; Agner, T; Andersen, KE; Gimenez-Arnau, AM; Gonçalo, Margarida; Goossens, A; Johansen, JD; Le Coz, CJ; Maibach, HIBACKGROUND: The currently used patch test concentration for formaldehyde is 1.0% (wt/vol) in water. However, clinical experience and previous studies suggest that 1.0% might be insufficient for detecting an optimized number of clinically relevant cases of contact allergy to formaldehyde. OBJECTIVES: To validate earlier patch test results for comparison of 1% (wt/vol) and 2% (wt/vol) formaldehyde in water, and t...