3 documents found, page 1 of 1
A worldwide test of the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching
Eastwick, P. W.; Sparks, J.; Finkel, E. J.; Meza, E. M.; Adamkovič, M.; Adu, P.; Ai, T.; Akintola, A. A.; Al-Shawaf, L.; Apriliawati, D.; Arriaga, P.Ideal partner preferences (i.e., ratings of the desirability of attributes like attractiveness or intelligence) are the source of numerous foundational findings in the interdisciplinary literature on human mating. Recently, research on the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching (i.e., Do people positively evaluate partners who match vs. mismatch their ideals?) has become mired in several probl...
Structural validity evidence for the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale across 15 lang...
Oshiro, B.; McAuliffe, W. H. B.; Luong, R.; Santos, A. C.; Findor, A.; Kuzminska, A. O.; Lantian, A.; Özdoğru, A. A.; Aczel, B.; Dinić, B. M.Background: The Psychological Science Accelerator (PSA) recently completed a large-scale moral psychology study using translated versions of the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale (OUS). However, the translated versions have no validity evidence. Objective: The study investigated the structural validity evidence of the OUS across 15 translated versions and produced version-specific validity reports. Methods: We analyz...
The psychological science accelerator’s COVID-19 rapid-response dataset
Buchanan, E. M.; Lewis, S. C.; Paris, B.; Forscher, P. S.; Pavlacic, J. M.; Beshears, J. E.; Drexler, S. M.; Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, A.; Mallik, P.In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Psychological Science Accelerator coordinated three large-scale psychological studies to examine the effects of loss-gain framing, cognitive reappraisals, and autonomy framing manipulations on behavioral intentions and affective measures. The data collected (April to October 2020) included specific measures for each experimental study, a general questionnaire examining ...