3 documents found, page 1 of 1
Health workers’ perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn health care...
Valente, EP; Mariani, I; Bomben, A; Morano, S; Gemperle, M; Otelea, MR; Miani, C; Elden, H; Sarantaki, A; Costa, R; Baranowska, B; König-Bachmann, MBackground Health workers’ (HWs’) perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) are not routinely collected. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to document HWs’ perspectives on QMNC around childbirth in 12 World Health Organization (WHO) European countries. Methods HWs involved in maternal/neonatal care for at least one year between March 2020 and March 2023 answered an online validated W...
Regional differences in the quality of maternal and neonatal care during the CO...
Costa, R; Barata, C; Dias, H; Rodrigues, C; Santos, T; Mariani, I; Covi, B; Valente, EP; Lazzerini, M; Ćerimagić, A; Drandić, D; Kurbanović, MObjective: To compare women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth across Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics 2 (NUTS-II) regions in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Women participating in the cross-sectional IMAgiNE EURO study who gave birth in Portugal from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, completed a structured questionna...
Rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean and quality of maternal and ne...
Lazzerini, M; Valente, EP; Covi, B; Rozée, V; Costa, R; Otelea, MR; Abderhalden-Zellweger, A; Węgrzynowska, M; Linden, K; Arendt, M; Brigidi, SObjective: To explore the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic by facility type among 16 European countries, comparing rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean. Methods: Women who gave birth in the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020, to February 7, 2022, answered a validated online questionnaire. Rates of instrumental birth, instrumental vaginal birth, and cesarea...