3 documents found, page 1 of 1
Structural validity evidence for the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale across 15 lang...
Oshiro, B.; McAuliffe, W. H. B.; Luong, R.; Santos, A. C.; Findor, A.; Kuzminska, A. O.; Lantian, A.; Özdoğru, A. A.; Aczel, B.; Dinić, B. M.Background: The Psychological Science Accelerator (PSA) recently completed a large-scale moral psychology study using translated versions of the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale (OUS). However, the translated versions have no validity evidence. Objective: The study investigated the structural validity evidence of the OUS across 15 translated versions and produced version-specific validity reports. Methods: We analyz...
Registered replication report: A large multilab cross-cultural conceptual repli...
Hall, B.; Schmidt, K.; Wagge, J.; Lewis, S. C.; Weissgerber, S. C.; Kiunke, F.; Pfuhl, G.; Stieger, S.; Tran, U. S.; Barzykowski, K.; Bogatyreva, N.According to the justified true belief (JTB) account of knowledge, people can truly know something only if they have a belief that is both justified and true (i.e., knowledge is JTB). This account was challenged by Gettier, who argued that JTB does not explain knowledge attributions in certain situations, later called “Gettier-type cases,” wherein protagonists are justified in believing something to be true, bu...
The psychological science accelerator’s COVID-19 rapid-response dataset
Buchanan, E. M.; Lewis, S. C.; Paris, B.; Forscher, P. S.; Pavlacic, J. M.; Beshears, J. E.; Drexler, S. M.; Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, A.; Mallik, P.In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Psychological Science Accelerator coordinated three large-scale psychological studies to examine the effects of loss-gain framing, cognitive reappraisals, and autonomy framing manipulations on behavioral intentions and affective measures. The data collected (April to October 2020) included specific measures for each experimental study, a general questionnaire examining ...