Document details

The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal

Author(s): Hernández-Moreno, Laura ; Senra, Hugo ; Marques, Ana Patricia ; Perdomo, Natacha Moreno ; Macedo, Antonio Filipe

Date: 2023

Persistent ID: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114170

Origin: Estudo Geral - Universidade de Coimbra

Subject(s): Randomised controlled trial; Vision impairment; Low vision; Vision rehabilitation; Visual ability; Magnification; Health-related quality of life; Cost-effectiveness


Description

Introduction: The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate the clinical impact of vision rehabilitation in patients with vision impairment and (2) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a basic vision rehabilitation service in Portugal. Methods: The trial recruited patients diagnosed with age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy (DR) and visual acuity in the range 0.4–1.0logMAR in the better-seeing eye. Participants were randomised to one of the study arms consisting of immediate intervention and delayed intervention. The intervention included: new refractive correction, optical reading aids, in-office training and advice about modifications at home. Visual ability, healthrelated quality of life and costs were measured. Economic analysis was performed to evaluate whether the intervention was cost-effective. The trial compared the outcomes 12 weeks after the start in both arms. Results: Of the 46 participants, 34 (74%) were diagnosed with DR, 25 (54%) were female, and mean age was 70.08 years (SD = 8.74). In the immediate intervention arm visual ability increased a mean of 0.523 logits (SE = 0.11) (p\0.001). Changes in the delayed intervention arm were not statistically significant (p = 0.95). Acuity in the better-seeing eye, near acuity and critical print size also improved during the study. The mean cost of the intervention was €118.79 (SD = 24.37). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using the EQ-5D 5L was 30,421€/QALY and 1186€/QALY when using near acuity. Conclusion: The current study gives evidence of positive clinical impact of a basic vision rehabilitation intervention and shows that a basic vision rehabilitation service is cost-effective. These findings are important to clinical and rehabilitation practices and for planning vision rehabilitation services.

Document Type Journal article
Language English
Contributor(s) Estudo Geral
facebook logo  linkedin logo  twitter logo 
mendeley logo

Related documents

No related documents