Detalhes do Documento

The Basic VRS-Effect Study: Clinical Trial Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation in Portugal

Autor(es): Hernández-Moreno, Laura ; Senra, Hugo ; Marques, Ana Patricia ; Perdomo, Natacha Moreno ; Macedo, Antonio Filipe

Data: 2023

Identificador Persistente: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114170

Origem: Estudo Geral - Universidade de Coimbra

Assunto(s): Randomised controlled trial; Vision impairment; Low vision; Vision rehabilitation; Visual ability; Magnification; Health-related quality of life; Cost-effectiveness


Descrição

Introduction: The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate the clinical impact of vision rehabilitation in patients with vision impairment and (2) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a basic vision rehabilitation service in Portugal. Methods: The trial recruited patients diagnosed with age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy (DR) and visual acuity in the range 0.4–1.0logMAR in the better-seeing eye. Participants were randomised to one of the study arms consisting of immediate intervention and delayed intervention. The intervention included: new refractive correction, optical reading aids, in-office training and advice about modifications at home. Visual ability, healthrelated quality of life and costs were measured. Economic analysis was performed to evaluate whether the intervention was cost-effective. The trial compared the outcomes 12 weeks after the start in both arms. Results: Of the 46 participants, 34 (74%) were diagnosed with DR, 25 (54%) were female, and mean age was 70.08 years (SD = 8.74). In the immediate intervention arm visual ability increased a mean of 0.523 logits (SE = 0.11) (p\0.001). Changes in the delayed intervention arm were not statistically significant (p = 0.95). Acuity in the better-seeing eye, near acuity and critical print size also improved during the study. The mean cost of the intervention was €118.79 (SD = 24.37). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using the EQ-5D 5L was 30,421€/QALY and 1186€/QALY when using near acuity. Conclusion: The current study gives evidence of positive clinical impact of a basic vision rehabilitation intervention and shows that a basic vision rehabilitation service is cost-effective. These findings are important to clinical and rehabilitation practices and for planning vision rehabilitation services.

Tipo de Documento Artigo científico
Idioma Inglês
Contribuidor(es) Estudo Geral
facebook logo  linkedin logo  twitter logo 
mendeley logo

Documentos Relacionados

Não existem documentos relacionados.