Detalhes do Documento

Qualitative research conducted in communities at risk of social exclusion raises complex ethical, epistemological, and methodological challenges that extend beyond formal procedural compliance. This article critically reflects on such challenges, drawing on the authors’ long-term research experience with people with intellectual disabilities and women engaged in sex work, as well as on existing methodological literature. Rather than presenting a standard empirical report, the text develops an essay-based reflection on the relational, contextual, and emotionally embedded nature of qualitative inquiry in stigmatized settings. The article argues that ethical research practice should be understood as an ongoing, situated process of negotiation rather than a fixed set of rules. Key tensions emerge around informed consent, participant vulnerability, researcher positionality, emotional engagement in fieldwork, and the boundaries of confidentiality and disclosure. These issues are amplified in contexts where participants are subject to stigma, institutional dependency, or social invisibility. The discussion is structured around four interrelated dimensions: linguistic sensitivity in constructing research categories, barriers to accessing marginalized communities, the emotional labor embedded in fieldwork, and tensions between confidentiality and scientific transparency. The analysis highlights how methodological decisions are deeply intertwined with ethical consequences and how researchers inevitably participate in co-constructing the social realities they study. Finally, the article proposes a set of methodological and ethical orientations for conducting qualitative research in such contexts, emphasizing reflexivity, relational ethics, flexible research design, and participatory engagement. While grounded in studies on intellectual disability and sex work, the conclusions are applicable to a broader range of marginalized populations and contribute to ongoing debates on ethical qualitative inquiry.