Author(s): Marinho, José ; Petters, Stefan M. ; Bertogna, Marko
Date: 2012
Persistent ID: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/3713
Origin: Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto
Subject(s): Dual priority scheduling; Non-preemptive scheduling; Real-time scheduling; Dual priority scheduling; Dual priority scheduling; Non-preemptive scheduling; Non-preemptive scheduling; Real-time scheduling; Real-time scheduling
While the earliest deadline first algorithm is known to be optimal as a uniprocessor scheduling policy, the implementation comes at a cost in terms of complexity. Fixed taskpriority algorithms on the other hand have lower complexity but higher likelihood of task sets being declared unschedulable, when compared to earliest deadline first (EDF). Various attempts have been undertaken to increase the chances of proving a task set schedulable with similar low complexity. In some cases, this was achieved by modifying applications to limit preemptions, at the cost of flexibility. In this work, we explore several variants of a concept to limit interference by locking down the ready queue at certain instances. The aim is to increase the prospects of schedulability of a given task system, without compromising on complexity or flexibility, when compared to the regular fixed task-priority algorithm. As a final contribution, a new preemption threshold assignment algorithm is provided which is less complex and more straightforward than the previous method available in the literature.
