Detalhes do Documento

Descrição

Submitted by Guilherme Lemeszenski (guilherme@nead.unesp.br) on 2013-08-22T18:45:18Z No. of bitstreams: 1 S2176-94512012000400017.pdf: 329463 bytes, checksum: b6703e77576a02747f6e48a04c076a14 (MD5)

Made available in DSpace on 2013-08-22T18:45:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 S2176-94512012000400017.pdf: 329463 bytes, checksum: b6703e77576a02747f6e48a04c076a14 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-08-01

Made available in DSpace on 2013-09-30T18:30:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 S2176-94512012000400017.pdf: 329463 bytes, checksum: b6703e77576a02747f6e48a04c076a14 (MD5) S2176-94512012000400017.pdf.txt: 32299 bytes, checksum: 175e5e34602d3cd666836551d7eb0dae (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-08-01

Submitted by Vitor Silverio Rodrigues (vitorsrodrigues@reitoria.unesp.br) on 2014-05-20T13:44:20Z No. of bitstreams: 2 S2176-94512012000400017.pdf: 329463 bytes, checksum: b6703e77576a02747f6e48a04c076a14 (MD5) S2176-94512012000400017.pdf.txt: 32299 bytes, checksum: 175e5e34602d3cd666836551d7eb0dae (MD5)

Made available in DSpace on 2014-05-20T13:44:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 S2176-94512012000400017.pdf: 329463 bytes, checksum: b6703e77576a02747f6e48a04c076a14 (MD5) S2176-94512012000400017.pdf.txt: 32299 bytes, checksum: 175e5e34602d3cd666836551d7eb0dae (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-08-01

INTRODUÇÃO: a preservação da estrutura de esmalte após a remoção dos acessórios ortodônticos é obrigação do clínico. Portanto, procura-se um protocolo de descolagem com bases científicas. OBJETIVO: objetivou-se avaliar por microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV) a influência de quatro protocolos de remoção de braquetes e polimento da superfície do esmalte e propor um protocolo que minimize os danosà superfície do esmalte. MÉTODOS: doze incisivos permanentes bovinos foram divididos em quatro grupos de acordo com os instrumentos utilizados para a descolagem dos braquetes e remoção do remanescente adesivo. Os braquetes foram descolados com o alicate de descolagem reto (Ormco Corp.) nos grupos 1 e 2, e com o instrumento de descolagem Lift-Off (3M Unitek) nos grupos 3 e 4. Os remanescentes adesivos dos grupos 1 e 3 foram removidos com o alicate removedor de resina longo (Ormco Corp.) e dos grupos 2 e 4 com broca de carboneto de tungstênio (Beavers Dental) em alta-rotação. As superfícies, após cada etapa da descolagem e polimento, foram avaliadas em réplicas de resina epóxica e foram obtidas eletromicrografias com aumento de 50 e 200X. RESULTADOS: os quatro protocolos de remoção de acessórios ortodônticos e polimento ocasionaram irregularidades no esmalte. Conclusão: a remoção do braquete com o alicate de descolagem reto, seguido da remoção do remanescente adesivo com broca de carboneto de tungstênio e polimento final com pasta de pedra-pomes foi o procedimento que ocasionou menores danos ao esmalte, sendo o protocolo sugerido para a remoção dos acessórios ortodônticos.

INTRODUCTION: Preserving the dental enamel structure during removal of orthodontic accessories is a clinician's obligation. Hence the search for an evidence based debonding protocol. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate and compare, by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the effects of four different protocols of bracket debonding and subsequent polishing on enamel surface, and to propose a protocol that minimizes damage to enamel surface. METHODS: Twelve bovine permanent incisors were divided into four groups according to the instrument used for debonding and removal of the adhesive remnant. In groups 1 and 2, brackets were debonded with a straight debonding plier (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA), and in groups 3 and 4, debonding was performed with the instrument Lift-Off (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA). In groups 1 and 3, the adhesive remnant was removed using a long adhesive removing plier (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) and in groups 2 and 4, residual adhesive was removed with a tungsten carbide bur (Beavers Dental) at high-speed. After each stage of debonding and polishing, enamel surfaces were replicated and electron micrographs were obtained with 50 and 200X magnification. RESULTS: All four protocols of debonding and polishing caused enamel irregularities. CONCLUSION: Debonding brackets with straight debonding plier, removal of adhesive remnant with a tungsten carbide bur and polishing with pumice and rubber cup was found to be the protocol that caused less damage to enamel surface, therefore this protocol is suggested for debonding brackets.

Case Western Reserve University Case School of Dental Medicine Department of Comprehensive Care

UNESP Araçatuba Dental School Department of Pediatric and Social Dentistry

UNESP Araçatuba Dental School Department of Pediatric and Social Dentistry