Autor(es):
Schellini, Silvana Artioli [UNESP] ; El Dib, Regina [UNESP] ; Limongi, Roberto Murillo ; Mörschbächer, Ricardo
Data: 2018
Identificador Persistente: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177498
Origem: Oasisbr
Assunto(s): Anophthalmic surgery; Ophthalmological surgical procedures; Orbital implants; Reconstructive surgical procedures; Anophthalmic surgery; Anophthalmic surgery; Ophthalmological surgical procedures; Ophthalmological surgical procedures; Orbital implants; Orbital implants; Reconstructive surgical procedures; Reconstructive surgical procedures
Descrição
Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-11T17:25:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2015-01-01
This literature review considers the treatment of an anophthalmic socket and the controversial aspects of the implants used to restore the lost volume after enucleation or evisceration, including the different materials employed and the main problems encountered during anophthalmic socket reconstruction. Since the 1980s, when integrated implants were proposed, there has been much controversy about what is the best implant for restoring the lost volume in an anophthalmic socket: integrated or non-integrated implants. Thus, we present this literature review to provide guidance to doctors and consumers.
Universidade Estadual de São Paulo 'Júlio de Mesquita Filho' (UNESP)
Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
Universidade Estadual de São Paulo 'Júlio de Mesquita Filho' (UNESP)
