Author(s): Milani, Suellen Oliveira [UNESP] ; Guimarães, José Augusto Chaves [UNESP] ; Olson, Hope A.
Date: 2018
Persistent ID: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177525
Origin: Oasisbr
Author(s): Milani, Suellen Oliveira [UNESP] ; Guimarães, José Augusto Chaves [UNESP] ; Olson, Hope A.
Date: 2018
Persistent ID: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/177525
Origin: Oasisbr
Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-11T17:25:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2014-01-01
Terms chosen to represent document subjects, the classification notations assigned to them, the abstracts and indices contain biases in two contexts. In a negative context, document surrogates are constructed with bias when they leave out diverse features, disenfranchise groups and topics outside an accepted norm (Olson, 2002). In this way, these document surrogates would convey inclinations, or prejudices. In a positive context, slanting or tendency (Hjørland, 2008a, McIlwaine, 2003) conveyed by the document surrogates to ensure specificity to particular discursive communities or knowledge domains can be observed. Considering that topics related to biases are scarce in the Information Organization literature, this paper proposes a discussion on the characteristics and occurrences of bias in subject representation. This study is exploratory and bibliographic, and adopts an inductive method.
São Paulo State University- UNESP
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
São Paulo State University- UNESP