Autor(es):
Stebner, Alexander ; Cimflova, Petra ; Bosshart, Salome L. ; Schüngel, Marie Sophie ; Fujiwara, Satoru ; Milot, Genevieve ; Volders, David ; Uchida, Kazutaka ; Hawkes, Christine ; Moreu, Manuel ; Fragata, Isabel ; Paul, Alexandra ; Pensato, Umberto ; Ulfert, Christian ; Frei, Donald ; Bhogal, Pervinder ; Schaafsma, Joanna ; Nardai, Sandor ; Zaidi, Syed ; Almekhlafi, Mohammed ; Nimjee, Shahid ; Mosimann, Pascal ; Kennedy, James ; Rempel, Jeremy ; Inoa, Violiza ; Yoshimura, Shinichi ; Ribo, Marc ; Lopes, Demetrius ; Wong, John ; Ospel, Johanna
Data: 2025
Identificador Persistente: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/199007
Origem: Repositório Institucional da UNL
Assunto(s): Aneurysm; coiling; endovascular; intrasaccular; woven endobridge; Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging; Clinical Neurology; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine; Aneurysm; Aneurysm; coiling; coiling; endovascular; endovascular; intrasaccular; intrasaccular; woven endobridge; woven endobridge; Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging; Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging; Clinical Neurology; Clinical Neurology; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Descrição
Background: Intracranial aneurysms are increasingly detected incidentally due to broader use of neuroimaging. Intrasaccular devices are frequently used to prevent rupture, yet standardized follow-up and retreatment strategies remain undefined. We performed a scoping literature review and DELPHI consensus to gauge current practice patterns and expert opinions on managing intracranial aneurysms that were previously treated with intrasaccular devices. Methods: A DELPHI consensus was conducted during an invite-only meeting of international neurointerventional experts. The process was informed by a scoping literature review and included three iterative rounds of structured questionnaires to establish consensus on follow-up imaging timing, modality, and retreatment decision-making. Results: Twenty-four experts participated. The literature review identified 16 key studies, which were presented to the panel. For completely occluded aneurysms, MRA at 6 months was preferred by 58% of participants, with annual imaging favored thereafter. For incompletely occluded aneurysms, 6-month DSA followed by annual imaging was recommended. No consensus was reached on the imaging modality for annual follow-up. Retreatment decisions were primarily driven by aneurysm growth (>2 mm). Endovascular retreatment was preferred over open surgery, with risks such as ischemia and rupture identified as key concerns. Conclusion: This DELPHI consensus highlights current practice trends and open questions in the follow-up and retreatment of aneurysms treated with intrasaccular devices.