Author(s): Mateus, Samuel
Date: 2022
Persistent ID: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/5540
Origin: DigitUMa - Repositório da Universidade da Madeira
Subject(s): Publicness; Public sphere; Social imaginaries; Public; Publicidade; Esfera pública; Imaginários sociais; Público; .; Faculdade de Artes e Humanidades
This paper contends the public sphere is a restrictive approach to public action. Despite the dysphoric development of the public sphere in post-modern societies, public action and communicative activity can easily be discerned if one recognizes that rational-critical deliberation is not the exclusive means to exercise it. I propose to separate what is an historical and idealized construct – the public sphere – from the socio-anthropological principle – publicness. The former consubstantiates a specific normative principle of legitimate political decision-making, as well as a peculiar space of communication and an ensemble of specific publics. The latter cannot be reduced to the strict formulation of the public sphere. Publicness is, first of all, a matter of cohesion and consensus on values in a society, reached through a communicative process that occurs in almost every social interaction. It does not absolutely depend on a capital Public or on a public sphere model to emerge and be felt by all members of a society. By tracing a brief panorama in the three main models of the public sphere (Habermas, Arendt, Negt & Kluge’s models), the paper suggests going beyond the public sphere by envisioning publicness as a socio anthropological principle characterized as being an empirical reality, as being pre political and pre-institutional, as well as a process linked to social imaginaries.
