Author(s): Bilhastre, Beatriz ; Pinto, Carlos ; Vala, Helena ; Mascarenhas, Paulo ; Branco, Sandra ; Ribeiro, Ana Clara
Date: 2025
Persistent ID: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/39412
Origin: Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora
Subject(s): Bovine; Papilloma virus type 1; ocular; Squamous cell carcinoma; PCR; Cattle
Bovine Ocular Squamous Cell Carcinoma (BOSCC) is the most prevalent ocular malignancy in cattle, primarily affecting the nictitating membrane but also involving other ocular and periocular structures, including the cornea, sclera, eyelids, third eyelid, limbus, and conjunctiva. Originating from keratinocytes, BOSCC is a significant cause of economic loss due to carcass rejection, increased veterinary costs, and decreased productivity. The disease has a multifactorial aetiology, with contributing factors including prolonged exposure to ultraviolet radiation, geographical elements such as latitude and altitude, as well as genetic predispositions, such as breed susceptibility and lack of eyelid pigmentation. Biological factors also play a role, particularly viral infections such as herpes viruses types 1 to 5 and papillomaviruses. Among these, bovine papillomaviruses (BPVs) — especially BPV-1 — have been associated with both benign and malignant tumours in cattle across various anatomical locations. The aim of this study was to identify the presence of BPV-1 DNA in bovine ocular squamous cell carcinoma samples, to better understand a potential viral contribution to tumorigenesis. A total of 134 samples was analysed. Tumour DNA and the corresponding normal mucosa were extracted from each sample. Genetic analysis for BPV-1 was performed through PCR followed by electrophoretic analysis. Eighteen per cent of the samples were positive (n=24 samples) for BPV-1 infection. The statistical analysis was conducted using a Bayesian Generalized Linear Mixed Model with fixed effects (log-odds scale), leading to the following conclusions: There is no strong evidence that island or virus status significantly predicts the presence of carcinoma in this sample. Extremely high variation at the tissue level highlights the importance of tissue-specific factors. The model estimates are imprecise, likely due to the small sample size or the complex data structure. These findings suggest a possible association between BPV-1 infection and the development of BOSCC (p>0,05), although further studies with a larger sample size and additional viral markers like other BPV types are needed to confirm a causal relationship. Understanding the role of BPV-1 in ocular carcinogenesis in cattle may contribute to future strategies for prevention and control of this pathology, including potential vaccination or breeding programs aimed at reducing susceptibility to viral oncogenesis.
