Author(s): Jácome, C. ; Pereira, A. M. ; Amaral, Rita ; Alves-Correia, M. ; Almeida, R. ; Mendes, S. ; Mendes, S. ; Fonseca, J. Almeida ; INSPIRERS group
Date: 2022
Persistent ID: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/25295
Origin: Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto
Subject(s): Telehealth; Telemedicine; Teleconsultation; COVID-19; Chronic diseases; Outpatient follow-up
This study aimed to characterise how the follow-up of outpatients was done during the first months of COVID-19 pandemic by a multidisciplinary group of physicians involved in an asthma mHealth project. A cross-sectional study based on a web survey was conducted. The survey was sent to 123 physicians working at secondary care centres of Portugal and Spain, that participate in the INSPIRERS project. A total of 65 physicians completed the survey (53% response rate). They had a mean of 18 (11) years of clinical practice and 14% were residents. More than half were allergists (58%), 22% pulmonologists and 20% paediatricians. Most were working in Portugal (89%) and in public hospitals (88%). All were conducting consultations: 71% presential (median [p25 , p75] duration 30 [20, 30] min), 91% telephonic (15 [10, 20] min) and 20% video consultations (20 [10, 28] min). The median duration of presential consultations was significantly higher than pre-COVID-19 (20 [20, 30] min; p = 0.021). From the physicians conducting video consultations, 92% were allergists and only 54% considered that their institution provided adequate conditions. The physicians of the INSPIRERS group used telephonic consultations as the main alternative to presential ones and 1/5 used video consultations. These results suggest the need to rethink clinical follow-up services for outpatients in the near future increasing the use of telemedicine, especially
