Detalhes do Documento

Remote versus In-Office Monitoring for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Results from a Randomized Pragmatic Controlled Study in Portugal

Autor(es): Martins Oliveira, M ; Fernandes, M ; Reis, H ; Primo, J ; Sanfins, V ; Silva, V ; Silva Cunha, P ; Silva, M ; Nicola, P ; PORTLink Study Investigators

Data: 2022

Identificador Persistente: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4382

Origem: Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE

Assunto(s): HSM CAR; Adult; Female; Male; Humans; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy*; Defibrillators, Implantable* / adverse effects; Portugal


Descrição

Introduction: Remote monitoring (RM) is a safe and effective alternative to in-office conventional follow-up. Objective: We aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with RM and its impact on healthcare resources in a population with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Methods: Randomized, pragmatic, open-label controlled trial, with adult wearers of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy with ICD (CRT-D), eligible for the CareLink® system. Patients newly implanted or with previous conventional follow-up were randomized to RM or conventional follow-up (control), and followed for 12 months, according to the centers' practice. The number of in-office visits and adverse events were compared between groups. Patient and healthcare professionals' satisfaction with RM were described. Results: Of the 134 randomized patients (69 RM; 65 control, aged 60±13 years), 80% were male, 23% employed, 72% ICD wearers and 54% newly implanted. Most patients (70%) reported travel costs less than 15€/visit, and 46% daily routine interference with in-office visits. Median physician/technician time with patient was 15 min/15 min, per in-office visit. Excluding baseline and final visits, control patients had more in-office visits in total: median 1 vs. 0, p<0.001. In 81% of the in-office visits, no clinical measures were taken. There were 10 adverse events, with no differences between groups. At the final visit, 95% of RM patients considered RM easy/very easy to use, and would all prefer to maintain RM and recommend it to others. All professionals found the CareLink website easy/very easy to use and were satisfied with transmission data. Conclusions: In a Portuguese population with ICD and CRT-D, RM safely reduced the burden of in-office visits, with high levels of satisfaction among patients and healthcare professionals.

Tipo de Documento Artigo científico
Idioma Inglês
Contribuidor(es) Repositório da Unidade Local de Saúde São José
facebook logo  linkedin logo  twitter logo 
mendeley logo

Documentos Relacionados

Não existem documentos relacionados.