Document details

Consistency of impact assessment protocols for non-native species

Author(s): González-Moreno, Pablo ; Lazzaro, Lorenzo ; Vilà, Montserrat ; Preda, Cristina ; Adriaens, Tim ; Bacher, Sven ; Brundu, Giuseppe ; Copp, Gordon H. ; Essl, Franz ; García-Berthou, Emili ; Katsanevakis, Stelios ; Moen, Toril Loennechen ; Lucy, Frances E. ; Nentwig, Wolfgang ; Roy, Helen E. ; Srėbalienė, Greta ; Talgø , Venche ; Vanderhoeven, Sonia ; Andjelković, Ana ; Arbačiauskas, Kęstutis ; Auger-Rozenberg, Marie-Anne ; Bae, Mi-Jung ; Bariche, Michel ; Boets, Pieter ; Boieiro, Mário ; Borges, Paulo ; Canning-Clode, João ; Cardigos, Federico ; Chartosia, Niki ; Cottier-Cook, Elizabeth Joanne ; Crocetta, Fabio ; D'hondt, Bram ; Foggi, Bruno ; Follak, Swen ; Gallardo, Belinda ; Gammelmo, Øivind ; Giakoumi, Sylvaine ; Giuliani, Claudia ; Guillaume, Fried ; Jelaska, Lucija Šerić ; Jeschke, Jonathan M. ; Jover, Miquel ; Juárez-Escario, Alejandro ; Kalogirou, Stefanos ; Kočić, Aleksandra ; Kytinou, Eleni ; Laverty, Ciaran ; Lozano, Vanessa ; Maceda-Veiga, Alberto ; Marchante, Elizabete ; Marchante, Hélia ; Martinou, Angeliki F. ; Meyer, Sandro ; Minchin, Dan ; Montero-Castaño, Ana ; Morais, Maria Cristina ; Morales-Rodriguez, Carmen ; Muhthassim, Naida ; Nagy, Zoltán Á. ; Ogris, Nikica ; Onen, Huseyin ; Pergl, Jan ; Puntila, Riikka ; Rabitsch, Wolfgang ; Ramburn, Triya Tessa ; Rego, Carla ; Reichenbach, Fabian ; Romeralo, Carmen ; Saul, Wolf-Christian ; Schrader, Gritta ; Sheehan, Rory ; Simonović, Predrag ; Skolka, Marius ; Soares, António Onofre ; Sundheim, Leif ; Tarkan, Ali Serhan ; Tomov, Rumen ; Tricarico, Elena ; Tsiamis, Konstantinos ; Uludağ, Ahmet ; van Valkenburg, Johan ; Verreycken, Hugo ; Vettraino, Anna Maria ; Vilar, Lluís ; Wiig, Øystein ; Witzell, Johanna ; Zanetta, Andrea ; Kenis, Marc

Date: 2019

Persistent ID: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/59759

Origin: Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa


Description

Standardized tools are needed to identify and prioritize the most harmful non-native species (NNS). A plethora of assessment protocols have been developed to evaluate the current and potential impacts of non-native species, but consistency among them has received limited attention. To estimate the consistency across impact assessment protocols, 89 specialists in biological invasions used 11 protocols to screen 57 NNS (2614 assessments). We tested if the consistency in the impact scoring across assessors, quantified as the coefficient of variation (CV), was dependent on the characteristics of the protocol, the taxonomic group and the expertise of the assessor. Mean CV across assessors was 40%, with a maximum of 223%. CV was lower for protocols with a low number of score levels, which demanded high levels of expertise, and when the assessors had greater expertise on the assessed species. The similarity among protocols with respect to the final scores was higher when the protocols considered the same impact types. We conclude that all protocols led to considerable inconsistency among assessors. In order to improve consistency, we highlight the importance of selecting assessors with high expertise, providing clear guidelines and adequate training but also deriving final decisions collaboratively by consensus.

Document Type Journal article
Language English
Contributor(s) Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto da ULisboa
CC Licence
facebook logo  linkedin logo  twitter logo 
mendeley logo

Related documents

No related documents