Detalhes do Documento

Evaluating Completeness of Reporting in Behavioral Interventions Pilot Trials: A Systematic Survey

Autor(es): Bhatt, Meha ; Zielinski, Laura ; Sanger, Nitika ; Shams, Ieta ; Luo, Candice ; Bantoto, Bianca ; Shahid, Hamnah ; Li, Guowei ; Abbade, Luciana P. F. [UNESP] ; Nwosu, Ikunna ; Jin, Yanling ; Wang, Mei ; Chang, Yaping ; Sun, Guangwen ; Mbuagbaw, Lawrence ; Levine, Mitchell A. H. ; Adachi, Jonathan D. ; Thabane, Lehana ; Samaan, Zainab

Data: 2018

Identificador Persistente: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/175539

Origem: Oasisbr

Assunto(s): behavioral interventions; feasibility trials; guideline adherence; pilot trials; reporting quality; transparency


Descrição

Made available in DSpace on 2018-12-11T17:16:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2018-07-01

Purpose: This systematic survey evaluates the completeness of reporting in pilot and feasibility randomized controlled trials investigating behavioral interventions based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension for pilot trials. Methods: The authors searched Medline/Pubmed and randomly selected 100 articles from 2012 through 2016 to determine the proportion of reported CONSORT extension items. They examined study factors related to reporting, including year and country of publication, psychotherapy intervention, multiple centers, industry funding, and journal endorsement of CONSORT. Results: The authors found that the mean reporting score on the CONSORT extension was 51.6% (SD = 15.1). Studies of psychotherapy interventions had significantly higher reporting scores than other interventions (incidence rate ratio = 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.01–1.20). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that current reporting quality is suboptimal. Many included trials failed to provide rationale for piloting, assess feasibility objectives, or indicate clear progression to a future large trial. Reporting quality should be reevaluated following uptake of the 2016 CONSORT extension for pilot trials.

Department of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact McMaster University

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences McMaster University

Department of Dermatology and Radiotherapy Botucatu Medical School Universidade EstadualPaulista UNESP

Father Sean O’Sullivan Research Centre St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton

Centre for Evaluation of Medicines Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute McMaster University

Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton

Population Genomics Program Chanchlani Research Centre McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West

Department of Dermatology and Radiotherapy Botucatu Medical School Universidade EstadualPaulista UNESP

Tipo de Documento Artigo científico
Idioma Inglês
facebook logo  linkedin logo  twitter logo 
mendeley logo

Documentos Relacionados

Não existem documentos relacionados.