Document details

Patient and family engagement interventions for enhancing patient safety in the perioperative journey

Author(s): Seyfulayeva, Ayshe ; Fonte, Bianca Ferreira ; Alho, Ana Margarida ; Shaikh, Anum ; Nunes, Ana Beatriz ; Casaca, Pedro Gonçalves Carvalho ; Leite, Andreia ; Taha, Ayda ; Dhingra-Kumar, Neelam ; Sousa, Paulo

Date: 2025

Persistent ID: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/183244

Origin: Repositório Institucional da UNL

Subject(s): Health policy; Patient safety; Patient-centred care; Shared decision making; Leadership and Management; Health Policy; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being


Description

Funding Information: The present publication was funded by Funda\u00E7\u00E3o Ci\u00EAncia e Tecnologia, IP national support through CHRC (UIDP/04923/2020). Publisher Copyright: © 2025 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Background Surgical procedures present intricate challenges within healthcare delivery, often associated with higher risks of adverse events compared with non-surgical contexts. Patient and family engagement (PFE) throughout the perioperative journey is a possibility to enhance care quality, safety and patient-centredness. However, literature addressing PFE across the entirety of the perioperative journey remains sparse. Objective The current scoping review aims to comprehensively map the existing interventions with PFE approach focused on improving patient safety across various types of surgical procedures throughout the perioperative journey. In addition, the review aims to understand the level and type of PFE approach adopted in this context. Eligibility criteria Articles published in indexed peer-reviewed journals from 2003 to 2023, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish, that report on interventions with PFE approach targeting adult surgical patients, their families, caregivers, patient advocates and patient champions. The review includes articles reporting on both inpatient and ambulatory surgical patients. Methods Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews framework, this review systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for relevant articles. Eligible interventions were categorised using PFE framework regarding the level of engagement and mapped according to the WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030. Results Out of 765 records initially identified, 32 met the eligibility criteria for data extraction and analysis, of which 40% originated from the USA, followed by the UK (18%) and Canada (12%). 47% of the interventions targeted € multiple/all types' of procedures, 19% focused on cardiothoracic surgeries and 9% on gynaecological procedures or organ transplant. The majority of the interventions (88%) focused on PFE at the direct care level, predominantly adopting a consultation-based approach. Furthermore, 81% of eligible interventions emphasised patient information and education, 16% addressed codevelopment of policy and 3% of interventions focused on patient advocacy. Conclusion The findings show a predominant focus on PFE interventions targeting patient safety at the direct care level, particularly in the provision of patient information and education. However, interventions at organisational and policy-making levels are notably scarce. Further investment is required to promote interventions engaging patients and families at broader organisational and policy-making levels.

Document Type Review
Language English
Contributor(s) Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP); Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública (CISP/PHRC); Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC) - Pólo ENSP; Laboratório Associado de Translacção e Inovação para a Saúde Global - LA Real (Pólo ENSP); RUN
facebook logo  linkedin logo  twitter logo 
mendeley logo

Related documents

No related documents