Autor(es):
Kissling, Esther ; Pozo, Francisco ; Buda, Silke ; Vilcu, Ana-Maria ; Rizzo, Caterina ; Gherasim, Alin ; Krisztina Horváth, Judit ; Brytting, Mia ; Domegan, Lisa ; Meijer, Adam ; Paradowska-Stankiewicz, Iwona ; Machado, Ausenda ; Višekruna Vučina, Vesna ; Lazar, Mihaela ; Johansen, Kari ; Dürrwald, Ralf ; van der Werf, Sylvie ; Bella, Antonino ; Larrauri, Amparo ; Ferenczi, Annamária ; Zakikhany, Katherina ; O'Donnell, Joan ; Dijkstra, Frederika ; Bogusz, Joanna ; Guiomar, Raquel ; Kurečić Filipović, Sanja ; Pitigoi, Daniela ; Penttinen, Pasi ; Valenciano, Marta ; Gomez, Veronica ; Kislaya, Irina ; Nunes, Baltazar ; I-MOVE/I-MOVE+ study team
Data: 2019
Identificador Persistente: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/6489
Origem: Repositório Científico do Instituto Nacional de Saúde
Assunto(s): Case-control Study; Europe; Influenza; Influenza Vaccine; Multicentre Study; Vaccine Effectiveness; Determinantes da Saúde e da Doença; Vacina Antigripal; Cuidados de Saúde; Efetividade; I-MOVE
Descrição
Introduction: Influenza A(H3N2) viruses predominated in Europe in 2016–17. In 2017–18 A(H3N2) and A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses co-circulated. The A(H3N2) vaccine component was the same in both seasons; while the A(H1N1)pdm09 component changed in 2017–18. In both seasons, vaccine seed A(H3N2) viruses developed adaptations/alterations during propagation in eggs, impacting antigenicity. Methods: We used the test-negative design in a multicentre primary care case-control study in 12 European countries to measure 2016–17 and 2017–18 influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) overall and by age group. Results: During the 2017–18 season, the overall VE against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was 59% (95% CI: 47–69). Among those aged 0–14, 15–64 and ≥65 years, VE against A(H1N1)pdm09 was 64% (95% CI: 37–79), 50% (95% CI: 28–66) and 66% (95% CI: 42–80), respectively. Overall VE against influenza A(H3N2) was 28% (95% CI: 17–38) in 2016–17 and 13% (95% CI: -15 to 34) in 2017–18. Among 0–14-year-olds VE against A(H3N2) was 28% (95%CI: -10 to 53) and 29% (95% CI: -87 to 73), among 15–64-year-olds 34% (95% CI: 18–46) and 33% (95% CI: -3 to 56) and among those aged ≥65 years 15% (95% CI: -10 to 34) and -9% (95% CI: -74 to 32) in 2016–17 and 2017–18, respectively. Conclusions: Our study suggests the new A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine component conferred good protection against circulating strains, while VE against A(H3N2) was <35% in 2016–17 and 2017–18. The egg propagation derived antigenic mismatch of the vaccine seed virus with circulating strains may have contributed to this low effectiveness. A(H3N2) seed viruses for vaccines in subsequent seasons may be subject to the same adaptations; in years with lower than expected VE, recommendations of preventive measures other than vaccination should be given in a timely manner.
