Autor(es):
Riesenberger, Bruna ; Rodriguez, Margarida ; Marques, Liliana ; Cervantes, Renata ; Gomes, Bianca ; Dias, Marta ; Pena, Pedro ; Ribeiro, Edna ; Viegas, Carla
Data: 2024
Identificador Persistente: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.21/17504
Origem: Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa
Assunto(s): Environmental health; Occupational exposure; Wastewater treatment plants; Sampling methods; Assays; Microbial contamination assessment; Bacteria; Fungi; FCT_UIDB/05608/2020; FCT_UIDP/05608/2020; FCT/MCTES/FSE/UE, 2023.01366.BD; UI/BD/153746/2022; CE3C unit UIDB/00329/2020; UI/BD/151431/2021; IPL/2022/InChildhealth/BI/12M; IPL/IDI&CA2023/FoodAIIEU_ESTeSL; IPL/IDI&CA2023/ASPRisk_ESTeSL; IPL/IDI&CA2023/ARAFSawmills_ESTeSL
Descrição
Background: Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are crucial in the scope of European Commission circular economy implementation. However, bioaerosol production may be a hazard to occupational and public health. A scoping review regarding microbial contamination exposure assessment in WWTPs was performed. Methods: This study was performed through PRISMA methodology in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Results: 28 papers were selected for data extraction. The WWTPs’ most common sampled sites are the aeration tank (42.86%), sludge dewatering basin (21.43%), and grit chamber. Air sampling is the preferred sampling technique and culture-based methods were the most frequently employed assays. Staphylococcus sp. (21.43%), Bacillus sp. (7.14%), Clostridium sp. (3.57%), Escherichia sp. (7.14%) and Legionella sp. (3.57%) were the most isolated bacteria and Aspergillus sp. (17.86%), Cladosporium sp. (10.71%) and Alternaria sp. (10.71%) dominated the fungal presence. Conclusions: This study allowed the identification of the following needs: (a) common protocol from the field (sampling campaign) to the lab (assays to employ); (b) standardized contextual information to be retrieved allowing a proper risk control and management; (c) the selection of the most suitable microbial targets to serve as indicators of harmful microbial exposure. Filling these gaps with further studies will help to provide robust science to policymakers and stakeholders.
