Publicação
Is leg kicking workout position affecting kinematic and hydrodynamic variables in front-craw?
| Resumo: | Swimming training includes leg kicking workouts, whereas swimmerschoose betweenhead out (RO) or headin (HI) position holding afllitter kick board. Ourobjective was to characterize andanalyse differences between the t\vo legkicking positions in Swimming Vdocity (Y, 1n m/s), lntra-cyclic variation of the horizontal velocity (dv, dimensionless), Active Drag (D, in N), Hydrodynamic Coefficient (CD •. dimensionless), Mechanical Power (P, in W) andfrontal surfacearea (FSA, ia m2). Thirteen swimmers (15.3 ± 2,9 years~old) participated in thisstudy. Frontal surface area was calculated according to the proposal of Morais et aI. (201l)byphotogrammetry. Aftefa standard warmup, swimmers performed 4x25mbouts at maximum velocity as follows: i) 2XcrawI HO Ieg-kick; ii) 2XcrawI HI Ieg-kick. ln the first bout ofeach the V and the dv were measured usingaspeedmeter cable that Was attached to lhe swimmer's hip (Barbosaet aI., 2013). In the secondbout CD was obtained through the velocity perturbation method (Kolmogorov and Duplishcheva, 1992). |
|---|---|
| Autores principais: | Brito, André |
| Outros Autores: | Morais, J.E.; Barbosa, Tiago M.; Silva, A.J.; Oliveira, Diogo R.; Garrido, Nuno D. |
| Assunto: | Swimming |
| Ano: | 2018 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Tipo de documento: | documento de conferência |
| Tipo de acesso: | acesso aberto |
| Instituição associada: | Instituto Politécnico de Bragança |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| Origem: | Biblioteca Digital do IPB |
| Resumo: | Swimming training includes leg kicking workouts, whereas swimmerschoose betweenhead out (RO) or headin (HI) position holding afllitter kick board. Ourobjective was to characterize andanalyse differences between the t\vo legkicking positions in Swimming Vdocity (Y, 1n m/s), lntra-cyclic variation of the horizontal velocity (dv, dimensionless), Active Drag (D, in N), Hydrodynamic Coefficient (CD •. dimensionless), Mechanical Power (P, in W) andfrontal surfacearea (FSA, ia m2). Thirteen swimmers (15.3 ± 2,9 years~old) participated in thisstudy. Frontal surface area was calculated according to the proposal of Morais et aI. (201l)byphotogrammetry. Aftefa standard warmup, swimmers performed 4x25mbouts at maximum velocity as follows: i) 2XcrawI HO Ieg-kick; ii) 2XcrawI HI Ieg-kick. ln the first bout ofeach the V and the dv were measured usingaspeedmeter cable that Was attached to lhe swimmer's hip (Barbosaet aI., 2013). In the secondbout CD was obtained through the velocity perturbation method (Kolmogorov and Duplishcheva, 1992). |
|---|