Publicação

Distance measures for image segmentation evaluation

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:In this paper we present a study of evaluation measures that enable the quantification of the quality of an image segmentation result. Despite significant advances in image segmentation techniques, evaluation of these techniques thus far has been largely subjective. Typically, the effectiveness of a new algorithm is demonstrated only by the presentation of a few segmented images and is otherwise left to subjective evaluation by the reader. Such an evaluation criterion can be useful for different applications: the comparison of segmentation results, the automatic choice of the best fitted parameters of a segmentation method for a given image, or the definition of new segmentation methods by optimization. We first present the state of art of distance evaluation measures, and then, we compare several evaluation criteria.
Autores principais:Monteiro, Fernando C.
Outros Autores:Campilho, Aurélio
Assunto:Benchmark Distance measures Ground truth Segmentation evaluation
Ano:2012
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:comunicação em conferência
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Biblioteca Digital do IPB
_version_ 1867173076098088960
author Monteiro, Fernando C.
author2 Campilho, Aurélio
author2_role author
author_facet Monteiro, Fernando C.
Campilho, Aurélio
author_role author
contributor_name_str_mv Biblioteca Digital do IPB
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Monteiro, Fernando C.\",\"Person.identifier.orcid\":\"0000-0002-1421-8006\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Campilho, Aurélio\"}]
datacite.contributors.contributor.contributorName.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital do IPB
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Monteiro, Fernando C.
Campilho, Aurélio
datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
datacite.date.available.fl_str_mv 2014-09-24T10:09:44Z
datacite.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2014-09-24T10:09:44Z
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv Benchmark
Distance measures
Ground truth
Segmentation evaluation
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Distance measures for image segmentation evaluation
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital do IPB
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Monteiro, Fernando C.
Campilho, Aurélio
dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2014-09-24T10:09:44Z
dc.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2014-09-24T10:09:44Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10198/10557
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Benchmark
Distance measures
Ground truth
Segmentation evaluation
dc.title.fl_str_mv Distance measures for image segmentation evaluation
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
description In this paper we present a study of evaluation measures that enable the quantification of the quality of an image segmentation result. Despite significant advances in image segmentation techniques, evaluation of these techniques thus far has been largely subjective. Typically, the effectiveness of a new algorithm is demonstrated only by the presentation of a few segmented images and is otherwise left to subjective evaluation by the reader. Such an evaluation criterion can be useful for different applications: the comparison of segmentation results, the automatic choice of the best fitted parameters of a segmentation method for a given image, or the definition of new segmentation methods by optimization. We first present the state of art of distance evaluation measures, and then, we compare several evaluation criteria.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format conferencePaper
fulltext.url.fl_str_mv https://bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt/bitstreams/3853a04e-1a81-48a7-ac72-dde6768faef8/download
id ipb_c643f0eeea9769696fda08ca4ed441b8
identifier.url.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10198/10557
instacron_str ipb
institution Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
instname_str Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
language eng
network_acronym_str ipb
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital do IPB
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/10557
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:ipb
person_str_mv Monteiro, Fernando C.
Monteiro, Fernando C.
https://www.ciencia-id.pt/2019-BDBF-10E2
2019-BDBF-10E2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1421-8006
0000-0002-1421-8006
Campilho, Aurélio
publishDate 2012
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital do IPB
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:ipb
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:ipb
spelling engporIn this paper we present a study of evaluation measures that enable the quantification of the quality of an image segmentation result. Despite significant advances in image segmentation techniques, evaluation of these techniques thus far has been largely subjective. Typically, the effectiveness of a new algorithm is demonstrated only by the presentation of a few segmented images and is otherwise left to subjective evaluation by the reader. Such an evaluation criterion can be useful for different applications: the comparison of segmentation results, the automatic choice of the best fitted parameters of a segmentation method for a given image, or the definition of new segmentation methods by optimization. We first present the state of art of distance evaluation measures, and then, we compare several evaluation criteria.application/pdfporDistance measures for image segmentation evaluationPersonalMonteiro, Fernando C.DSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/363b6c37-282c-4cd6-bb54-3c97cc700d78DSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/363b6c37-282c-4cd6-bb54-3c97cc700d78MonteiroFernando C.Ciência IDhttps://www.ciencia-id.pt2019-BDBF-10E2ORCIDhttp://orcid.org0000-0002-1421-8006Researcher IDhttps://www.researcherid.comH-9213-2016Scopus Author IDhttps://www.scopus.com8986162600Campilho, AurélioHostingInstitutionOrganizationalBiblioteca Digital do IPBe-mailmailto:dspace@ipb.ptdspace@ipb.ptISBNIsPartOf978-073541091-6DOIIsPartOf10.1063/1.47562572014-09-24T10:09:44Z20122012-01-01T00:00:00ZHandlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/10557http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2open accessBenchmarkDistance measuresGround truthSegmentation evaluation179422 bytesother research producthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794conference paperhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2application/pdffulltexthttps://bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt/bitstreams/3853a04e-1a81-48a7-ac72-dde6768faef8/downloadInternational Conference of Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, ICNAAM 20121479794797Kos - Greece
spellingShingle Distance measures for image segmentation evaluation
Monteiro, Fernando C.
Benchmark
Distance measures
Ground truth
Segmentation evaluation
status SINGLETON
subject.fl_str_mv Benchmark
Distance measures
Ground truth
Segmentation evaluation
title Distance measures for image segmentation evaluation
title_full Distance measures for image segmentation evaluation
title_fullStr Distance measures for image segmentation evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Distance measures for image segmentation evaluation
title_short Distance measures for image segmentation evaluation
title_sort Distance measures for image segmentation evaluation
topic Benchmark
Distance measures
Ground truth
Segmentation evaluation
topic_facet Benchmark
Distance measures
Ground truth
Segmentation evaluation
url http://hdl.handle.net/10198/10557
visible 1