Publicação

Predicting the financial crisis volatility

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:A volatility model must be able to forecast volatility even in extreme situations. Thus, the main objective of this paper, and due to the most recent increase in international stock markets' volatility, is to check which one of the most popular autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models (GARCH, GJR, EGARCH or APARCH) is more able to predict the extreme volatility in 2008 considering the daily returns of eight major international stock market indexes: CAC 40 (France), DAX 30 (Germany), FTSE 100 (UK), NIKKEI 225 (Japan), HANG SENG (Hong Kong), NASDAQ 100, DJIA and S&P 500 (United States). Goodness-of-fit measures demonstrate that EGARCH and APARCH models are able to correctly fit the conditional heteroskedasticity dynamics of the return's series under study. In terms of volatility forecast comparisons, using the Harvey-Newbold test for multiple forecasts encompassing and the ranking of forecasts based on the coefficient of determination (R-2) resulting from the Mincer-Zarnowitz regression, we conclude that EGARCH dominates competing standard asymmetric models.
Autores principais:Curto, J.
Outros Autores:Pinto, J.
Assunto:Forecasting volatility EGARCH APARCH GJR
Ano:2012
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:acesso embargado
Instituição associada:ISCTE
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Repositório ISCTE
_version_ 1868443704895733760
author Curto, J.
author2 Pinto, J.
author2_role author
author_facet Curto, J.
Pinto, J.
author_role author
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Curto, J.\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Pinto, J.\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Curto, J.
Pinto, J.
datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
datacite.date.available.fl_str_mv 2015-12-09T16:09:22Z
datacite.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2015-12-09T16:09:22Z
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv Forecasting volatility
EGARCH
APARCH
GJR
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Predicting the financial crisis volatility
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Curto, J.
Pinto, J.
dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2015-12-09T16:09:22Z
dc.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2015-12-09T16:09:22Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/6335
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editura Academia de studii economice
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Forecasting volatility
EGARCH
APARCH
GJR
dc.title.fl_str_mv Predicting the financial crisis volatility
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description A volatility model must be able to forecast volatility even in extreme situations. Thus, the main objective of this paper, and due to the most recent increase in international stock markets' volatility, is to check which one of the most popular autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models (GARCH, GJR, EGARCH or APARCH) is more able to predict the extreme volatility in 2008 considering the daily returns of eight major international stock market indexes: CAC 40 (France), DAX 30 (Germany), FTSE 100 (UK), NIKKEI 225 (Japan), HANG SENG (Hong Kong), NASDAQ 100, DJIA and S&P 500 (United States). Goodness-of-fit measures demonstrate that EGARCH and APARCH models are able to correctly fit the conditional heteroskedasticity dynamics of the return's series under study. In terms of volatility forecast comparisons, using the Harvey-Newbold test for multiple forecasts encompassing and the ranking of forecasts based on the coefficient of determination (R-2) resulting from the Mincer-Zarnowitz regression, we conclude that EGARCH dominates competing standard asymmetric models.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
format article
id iscte_63a100b41dcc7eef4dbab5dcd48dee98
identifier.url.fl_str_mv https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/6335
instacron_str iscte
institution ISCTE
instname_str ISCTE
language eng
network_acronym_str iscte
network_name_str Repositório ISCTE
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/10331
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:iscte
person_str_mv Curto, J.
Pinto, J.
publishDate 2012
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editura Academia de studii economice
reponame_str Repositório ISCTE
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:iscte
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:iscte
spelling porA volatility model must be able to forecast volatility even in extreme situations. Thus, the main objective of this paper, and due to the most recent increase in international stock markets' volatility, is to check which one of the most popular autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models (GARCH, GJR, EGARCH or APARCH) is more able to predict the extreme volatility in 2008 considering the daily returns of eight major international stock market indexes: CAC 40 (France), DAX 30 (Germany), FTSE 100 (UK), NIKKEI 225 (Japan), HANG SENG (Hong Kong), NASDAQ 100, DJIA and S&P 500 (United States). Goodness-of-fit measures demonstrate that EGARCH and APARCH models are able to correctly fit the conditional heteroskedasticity dynamics of the return's series under study. In terms of volatility forecast comparisons, using the Harvey-Newbold test for multiple forecasts encompassing and the ranking of forecasts based on the coefficient of determination (R-2) resulting from the Mincer-Zarnowitz regression, we conclude that EGARCH dominates competing standard asymmetric models.application/pdfengEditura Academia de studii economiceporPredicting the financial crisis volatilityCurto, J.Pinto, J.URLhttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/6335ISSNIsPartOf0424-267XDOIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/103312015-12-09T16:09:22Z2012-01-01T00:00:00Z20122015-12-09T16:08:09Zhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cfembargoed accessporForecasting volatilityporEGARCHporAPARCHporGJR8019475 byteshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cfapplication/pdffulltexthttps://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstreams/11006e8e-d203-4713-ba42-a4674321399d/downloadliteraturehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501journal article
spellingShingle Predicting the financial crisis volatility
Curto, J.
Forecasting volatility
EGARCH
APARCH
GJR
status SINGLETON
subject.fl_str_mv Forecasting volatility
EGARCH
APARCH
GJR
title Predicting the financial crisis volatility
title_full Predicting the financial crisis volatility
title_fullStr Predicting the financial crisis volatility
title_full_unstemmed Predicting the financial crisis volatility
title_short Predicting the financial crisis volatility
title_sort Predicting the financial crisis volatility
topic Forecasting volatility
EGARCH
APARCH
GJR
topic_facet Forecasting volatility
EGARCH
APARCH
GJR
url https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/public/pub/id/6335
visible 1