Publicação

Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:Algorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey (N = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a significant part of the general population holds (multiple) misconceptions about algorithms in the media. We found that erroneous beliefs about algorithms are more common among (1) older people (vs. younger people), (2) lower-educated people (vs. higher-educated), and (3) women (vs. men). In addition, it was found that people who had no specific sources to inform themselves about algorithms, and those relying on their friends/family for information, were more likely to have algorithmic misconceptions. Conversely, media channels, school, and having one’s own (online) experiences were found to be sources associated with having fewer algorithmic misconceptions. Theoretical implications are formulated in the context of algorithmic awareness and the digital divide. Finally, societal implications are discussed, such as the need for algorithmic literacy initiatives.
Autores principais:Zarouali, Brahim
Outros Autores:Helberger, Natali; de Vreese, Claes H.
Assunto:algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technology
Ano:2021
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:unknown
Instituição associada:Cogitatio Press
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Media and Communication
_version_ 1869074038856351744
author Zarouali, Brahim
author2 Helberger, Natali
de Vreese, Claes H.
author2_role author
author
author_facet Zarouali, Brahim
Helberger, Natali
de Vreese, Claes H.
author_role author
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Zarouali, Brahim\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Helberger, Natali\"},{\"Person.name\":\"de Vreese, Claes H.\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Zarouali, Brahim
Helberger, Natali
de Vreese, Claes H.
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technology
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Zarouali, Brahim
Helberger, Natali
de Vreese, Claes H.
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Algorithmic Systems in the Digital Society; 134-144
2183-2439
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technology
dc.title.fl_str_mv Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description Algorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey (N = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a significant part of the general population holds (multiple) misconceptions about algorithms in the media. We found that erroneous beliefs about algorithms are more common among (1) older people (vs. younger people), (2) lower-educated people (vs. higher-educated), and (3) women (vs. men). In addition, it was found that people who had no specific sources to inform themselves about algorithms, and those relying on their friends/family for information, were more likely to have algorithmic misconceptions. Conversely, media channels, school, and having one’s own (online) experiences were found to be sources associated with having fewer algorithmic misconceptions. Theoretical implications are formulated in the context of algorithmic awareness and the digital divide. Finally, societal implications are discussed, such as the need for algorithmic literacy initiatives.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv unknown
format article
id mc_f8a7159e498ff5763d4e6d2d798bfb4c
identifier.doi.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090
inst_facet_str urn:organizationAcronym:cp{{{_:::_}}}Cogitatio Press
instacron_str cp
institution Cogitatio Press
instname_str Cogitatio Press
language eng
network_acronym_str mc
network_name_str Media and Communication
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4090
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:cp
person_str_mv Zarouali, Brahim
Helberger, Natali
de Vreese, Claes H.
publishDate 2021
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
repo_facet_str urn:repositoryAcronym:mc{{{_:::_}}}Media and Communication
reponame_str Media and Communication
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:mc
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:mc
spelling en-USInvestigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?Zarouali, BrahimHelberger, Natalide Vreese, Claes H.algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technologyCopyright (c) 2021 Brahim Zarouali, Natali Helberger, Claes H. de Vreesehttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090DOIoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4090OAIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4090URLhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090DOIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4090/4090URLHasVersion2021-11-18en-USAlgorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey (N = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a significant part of the general population holds (multiple) misconceptions about algorithms in the media. We found that erroneous beliefs about algorithms are more common among (1) older people (vs. younger people), (2) lower-educated people (vs. higher-educated), and (3) women (vs. men). In addition, it was found that people who had no specific sources to inform themselves about algorithms, and those relying on their friends/family for information, were more likely to have algorithmic misconceptions. Conversely, media channels, school, and having one’s own (online) experiences were found to be sources associated with having fewer algorithmic misconceptions. Theoretical implications are formulated in the context of algorithmic awareness and the digital divide. Finally, societal implications are discussed, such as the need for algorithmic literacy initiatives.Cogitatioapplication/pdfen-USMedia and Communication; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Algorithmic Systems in the Digital Society; 134-1442183-2439engjournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501literatureVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
spellingShingle Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
Zarouali, Brahim
algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technology
status SINGLETON
status_str VoR
subject.fl_str_mv algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technology
title Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_full Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_fullStr Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_short Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
title_sort Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?
topic algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technology
topic_facet algorithms; algorithmic awareness; digital divide; misconceptions; technology
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4090
visible 1