Publicação

A Regulatory‐Developmental Turn Within EU Industrial Policy? The Case of the Battery IPCEIs

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:The European automotive industry is transitioning from combustion engines to electric vehicles but lags behind international competitors. This geoeconomic competition has contributed to the revival of industrial policy in the EU. However, EU competition policy restricts more vertical industrial policy approaches. In this context, the Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) have emerged as a novel governance tool. This article examines this transformation in EU industrial policy by focusing on the Battery IPCEIs. The article includes an in-depth case study of the Battery IPCEIs, using secondary literature and 11 expert interviews. It concludes that IPCEIs represent a gradual regulatory-developmental turn within EU industrial policy by drawing on developmental state theory in a European context, critical EU integration literature, and global production networks research. In response to geoeconomic competition and the region’s lack of productive capacities, the EU is indirectly facilitating the development of European battery innovation and production networks by issuing direct state aid at the national level. However, the EU’s participation in the subsidy race and the global green-tech race via “green” industrial policy indicates only a partial shift in the relationship between states and markets.
Autores principais:Gräf, Helena
Assunto:batteries; competition policy; developmental state; European Union; global production networks; industrial policy; IPCEIs; subsidies
Ano:2024
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:unknown
Instituição associada:Cogitatio Press
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Politics and Governance
_version_ 1863908140012011520
author Gräf, Helena
author_facet Gräf, Helena
author_role author
country_str PT
creators_json_str [{\"Person.name\":\"Gräf, Helena\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Gräf, Helena
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv batteries; competition policy; developmental state; European Union; global production networks; industrial policy; IPCEIs; subsidies
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv A Regulatory‐Developmental Turn Within EU Industrial Policy? The Case of the Battery IPCEIs
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gräf, Helena
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8188
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.rights.copyright.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 12 (2024): The Geoeconomic Turn in International Trade, Investment, and Technology
2183-2463
10.17645/pag.i383
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv batteries; competition policy; developmental state; European Union; global production networks; industrial policy; IPCEIs; subsidies
dc.title.fl_str_mv A Regulatory‐Developmental Turn Within EU Industrial Policy? The Case of the Battery IPCEIs
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description The European automotive industry is transitioning from combustion engines to electric vehicles but lags behind international competitors. This geoeconomic competition has contributed to the revival of industrial policy in the EU. However, EU competition policy restricts more vertical industrial policy approaches. In this context, the Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) have emerged as a novel governance tool. This article examines this transformation in EU industrial policy by focusing on the Battery IPCEIs. The article includes an in-depth case study of the Battery IPCEIs, using secondary literature and 11 expert interviews. It concludes that IPCEIs represent a gradual regulatory-developmental turn within EU industrial policy by drawing on developmental state theory in a European context, critical EU integration literature, and global production networks research. In response to geoeconomic competition and the region’s lack of productive capacities, the EU is indirectly facilitating the development of European battery innovation and production networks by issuing direct state aid at the national level. However, the EU’s participation in the subsidy race and the global green-tech race via “green” industrial policy indicates only a partial shift in the relationship between states and markets.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv unknown
format article
id pg_0ee922c8d51200c0ea2af035d331e52b
identifier.doi.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8188
instacron_str cp
institution Cogitatio Press
instname_str Cogitatio Press
language eng
network_acronym_str pg
network_name_str Politics and Governance
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/8188
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:cp
person_str_mv Gräf, Helena
publishDate 2024
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
reponame_str Politics and Governance
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
spelling en-USA Regulatory‐Developmental Turn Within EU Industrial Policy? The Case of the Battery IPCEIsGräf, Helenabatteries; competition policy; developmental state; European Union; global production networks; industrial policy; IPCEIs; subsidiesCopyright (c) 2024 Helena Gräfhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8188DOIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/8188URLHasVersionhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/8188/3925URLHasVersionhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/8188/3963URLHasVersionhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8188DOI2024-09-19en-USThe European automotive industry is transitioning from combustion engines to electric vehicles but lags behind international competitors. This geoeconomic competition has contributed to the revival of industrial policy in the EU. However, EU competition policy restricts more vertical industrial policy approaches. In this context, the Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) have emerged as a novel governance tool. This article examines this transformation in EU industrial policy by focusing on the Battery IPCEIs. The article includes an in-depth case study of the Battery IPCEIs, using secondary literature and 11 expert interviews. It concludes that IPCEIs represent a gradual regulatory-developmental turn within EU industrial policy by drawing on developmental state theory in a European context, critical EU integration literature, and global production networks research. In response to geoeconomic competition and the region’s lack of productive capacities, the EU is indirectly facilitating the development of European battery innovation and production networks by issuing direct state aid at the national level. However, the EU’s participation in the subsidy race and the global green-tech race via “green” industrial policy indicates only a partial shift in the relationship between states and markets.Cogitatio Pressapplication/pdfen-USPolitics and Governance; Vol 12 (2024): The Geoeconomic Turn in International Trade, Investment, and Technology2183-246310.17645/pag.i383engjournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501literatureVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle A Regulatory‐Developmental Turn Within EU Industrial Policy? The Case of the Battery IPCEIs
Gräf, Helena
batteries; competition policy; developmental state; European Union; global production networks; industrial policy; IPCEIs; subsidies
status_str VoR
subject.fl_str_mv batteries; competition policy; developmental state; European Union; global production networks; industrial policy; IPCEIs; subsidies
title A Regulatory‐Developmental Turn Within EU Industrial Policy? The Case of the Battery IPCEIs
title_full A Regulatory‐Developmental Turn Within EU Industrial Policy? The Case of the Battery IPCEIs
title_fullStr A Regulatory‐Developmental Turn Within EU Industrial Policy? The Case of the Battery IPCEIs
title_full_unstemmed A Regulatory‐Developmental Turn Within EU Industrial Policy? The Case of the Battery IPCEIs
title_short A Regulatory‐Developmental Turn Within EU Industrial Policy? The Case of the Battery IPCEIs
title_sort A Regulatory‐Developmental Turn Within EU Industrial Policy? The Case of the Battery IPCEIs
topic batteries; competition policy; developmental state; European Union; global production networks; industrial policy; IPCEIs; subsidies
topic_facet batteries; competition policy; developmental state; European Union; global production networks; industrial policy; IPCEIs; subsidies
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8188
visible 1