Publicação

Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:Within Australia’s federal system, responsibility for preventing, preparing for, responding to and recovering from natural disasters is shared between the three tiers of government. Intergovernmental policy and funding arrangements are premised on shared responsibility and aim to foster individual, business and community resilience. These arrangements underpin Australia’s international reputation for effectiveness in its management of natural disasters. The capacity of the diverse networks that comprise the disaster management system to coordinate and deliver in the preparedness and response phases of a disaster, and to provide relief in the immediate aftermath, has been developed over time and tested and refined through the experience of frequent, severe disaster events over recent decades. Less well developed is the system’s ability to support economic recovery in disaster-affected communities over the longer term. This paper presents case studies of regional communities affected by two of Australia’s most expensive and deadly natural disasters—the 2009 Victorian bushfires and the cyclones and floods that struck the state of Queensland in 2010–2011. It highlights significant gaps in policy and funding arrangements to support recovery and offers lessons for aligning recovery within a resilience framework.
Autores principais:Drennan, Lex
Outros Autores:McGowan, Jim; Tiernan, Anne
Assunto:disaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policy
Ano:2016
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:unknown
Instituição associada:Cogitatio Press
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Politics and Governance
_version_ 1863908134495453184
author Drennan, Lex
author2 McGowan, Jim
Tiernan, Anne
author2_role author
author
author_facet Drennan, Lex
McGowan, Jim
Tiernan, Anne
author_role author
country_str PT
creators_json_str [{\"Person.name\":\"Drennan, Lex\"},{\"Person.name\":\"McGowan, Jim\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Tiernan, Anne\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Drennan, Lex
McGowan, Jim
Tiernan, Anne
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv disaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policy
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Drennan, Lex
McGowan, Jim
Tiernan, Anne
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Disaster Policies and Governance: Promoting Community Resilience; 74-86
2183-2463
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv disaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policy
dc.title.fl_str_mv Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description Within Australia’s federal system, responsibility for preventing, preparing for, responding to and recovering from natural disasters is shared between the three tiers of government. Intergovernmental policy and funding arrangements are premised on shared responsibility and aim to foster individual, business and community resilience. These arrangements underpin Australia’s international reputation for effectiveness in its management of natural disasters. The capacity of the diverse networks that comprise the disaster management system to coordinate and deliver in the preparedness and response phases of a disaster, and to provide relief in the immediate aftermath, has been developed over time and tested and refined through the experience of frequent, severe disaster events over recent decades. Less well developed is the system’s ability to support economic recovery in disaster-affected communities over the longer term. This paper presents case studies of regional communities affected by two of Australia’s most expensive and deadly natural disasters—the 2009 Victorian bushfires and the cyclones and floods that struck the state of Queensland in 2010–2011. It highlights significant gaps in policy and funding arrangements to support recovery and offers lessons for aligning recovery within a resilience framework.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv unknown
format article
id pg_2837bb26dc29c19bc362d082607a5849
identifier.doi.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741
instacron_str cp
institution Cogitatio Press
instname_str Cogitatio Press
language eng
network_acronym_str pg
network_name_str Politics and Governance
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/741
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:cp
person_str_mv Drennan, Lex
McGowan, Jim
Tiernan, Anne
publishDate 2016
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
reponame_str Politics and Governance
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
spelling en-USIntegrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional AustraliaDrennan, LexMcGowan, JimTiernan, Annedisaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policyCopyright (c) 2016 Lex Drennan, Jim McGowan, Anne Tiernanhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741DOIoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/741OAIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/741URLhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741DOIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/741/741URLHasVersion2016-12-28en-USWithin Australia’s federal system, responsibility for preventing, preparing for, responding to and recovering from natural disasters is shared between the three tiers of government. Intergovernmental policy and funding arrangements are premised on shared responsibility and aim to foster individual, business and community resilience. These arrangements underpin Australia’s international reputation for effectiveness in its management of natural disasters. The capacity of the diverse networks that comprise the disaster management system to coordinate and deliver in the preparedness and response phases of a disaster, and to provide relief in the immediate aftermath, has been developed over time and tested and refined through the experience of frequent, severe disaster events over recent decades. Less well developed is the system’s ability to support economic recovery in disaster-affected communities over the longer term. This paper presents case studies of regional communities affected by two of Australia’s most expensive and deadly natural disasters—the 2009 Victorian bushfires and the cyclones and floods that struck the state of Queensland in 2010–2011. It highlights significant gaps in policy and funding arrangements to support recovery and offers lessons for aligning recovery within a resilience framework.Cogitatioapplication/pdfen-USPolitics and Governance; Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Disaster Policies and Governance: Promoting Community Resilience; 74-862183-2463engjournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501literatureVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
spellingShingle Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia
Drennan, Lex
disaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policy
status_str VoR
subject.fl_str_mv disaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policy
title Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia
title_full Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia
title_fullStr Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia
title_full_unstemmed Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia
title_short Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia
title_sort Integrating Recovery within a Resilience Framework: Empirical Insights and Policy Implications from Regional Australia
topic disaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policy
topic_facet disaster governance; disaster recovery; economic recovery; resilience policy
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.741
visible 1