Publicação

Disaster Governance in Conflict-Affected Authoritarian Contexts: The Cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:Disaster governance in conflict areas is of growing academic concern, but most existing research comprises either single case studies or studies of a variety of country contexts that group all types of conflict together. Based on three case studies, this article offers a middle-ground scenario-based approach, focusing on disaster governance in authoritarian contexts experiencing low-intensity conflict. Low-intensity conflict is characterized by intense political tensions and violence that is more readily expressed in ways other than direct physical harm. Inspired by Olson’s (2000) maxim that disasters are intrinsically political, this article explores the politics of disaster response by asking what is at stake and what happened, unpacking these questions for state, civil society, and international humanitarian actors. Using data from a total of one year of qualitative fieldwork, the article analyzes disaster governance in 2016 drought-ridden Ethiopia, marked by protests and a State of Emergency; 2015 flooded Myanmar, characterized by explosive identity politics; and 2016–2019 drought-ridden Zimbabwe, with its intense socioeconomic and political turbulence. The study’s findings show how framing and power processes in disaster governance—comprising state and non-state actors—largely lean toward the state, with the consequence that political interests, rather than needs assessments, steer who and what will be protected from disaster impact.
Autores principais:Desportes, Isabelle
Outros Autores:Hilhorst, Dorothea
Assunto:authoritarianism; conflict; disaster response; Ethiopia; governance; humanitarian; Myanmar; politics; Zimbabwe
Ano:2020
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:unknown
Instituição associada:Cogitatio Press
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Politics and Governance
_version_ 1863908136013791232
author Desportes, Isabelle
author2 Hilhorst, Dorothea
author2_role author
author_facet Desportes, Isabelle
Hilhorst, Dorothea
author_role author
country_str PT
creators_json_str [{\"Person.name\":\"Desportes, Isabelle\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Hilhorst, Dorothea\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Desportes, Isabelle
Hilhorst, Dorothea
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv authoritarianism; conflict; disaster response; Ethiopia; governance; humanitarian; Myanmar; politics; Zimbabwe
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Disaster Governance in Conflict-Affected Authoritarian Contexts: The Cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Desportes, Isabelle
Hilhorst, Dorothea
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3127
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): The Politics of Disaster Governance; 343-354
2183-2463
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv authoritarianism; conflict; disaster response; Ethiopia; governance; humanitarian; Myanmar; politics; Zimbabwe
dc.title.fl_str_mv Disaster Governance in Conflict-Affected Authoritarian Contexts: The Cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description Disaster governance in conflict areas is of growing academic concern, but most existing research comprises either single case studies or studies of a variety of country contexts that group all types of conflict together. Based on three case studies, this article offers a middle-ground scenario-based approach, focusing on disaster governance in authoritarian contexts experiencing low-intensity conflict. Low-intensity conflict is characterized by intense political tensions and violence that is more readily expressed in ways other than direct physical harm. Inspired by Olson’s (2000) maxim that disasters are intrinsically political, this article explores the politics of disaster response by asking what is at stake and what happened, unpacking these questions for state, civil society, and international humanitarian actors. Using data from a total of one year of qualitative fieldwork, the article analyzes disaster governance in 2016 drought-ridden Ethiopia, marked by protests and a State of Emergency; 2015 flooded Myanmar, characterized by explosive identity politics; and 2016–2019 drought-ridden Zimbabwe, with its intense socioeconomic and political turbulence. The study’s findings show how framing and power processes in disaster governance—comprising state and non-state actors—largely lean toward the state, with the consequence that political interests, rather than needs assessments, steer who and what will be protected from disaster impact.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv unknown
format article
id pg_2a1b73aa6366ea90cdc2a2378cfc841f
identifier.doi.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3127
instacron_str cp
institution Cogitatio Press
instname_str Cogitatio Press
language eng
network_acronym_str pg
network_name_str Politics and Governance
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3127
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:cp
person_str_mv Desportes, Isabelle
Hilhorst, Dorothea
publishDate 2020
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
reponame_str Politics and Governance
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
spelling en-USDisaster Governance in Conflict-Affected Authoritarian Contexts: The Cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and ZimbabweDesportes, IsabelleHilhorst, Dorotheaauthoritarianism; conflict; disaster response; Ethiopia; governance; humanitarian; Myanmar; politics; ZimbabweCopyright (c) 2020 Isabelle Desportes, Dorothea Hilhorsthttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3127DOIoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3127OAIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3127URLhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3127DOIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3127/3127URLHasVersion2020-12-10en-USDisaster governance in conflict areas is of growing academic concern, but most existing research comprises either single case studies or studies of a variety of country contexts that group all types of conflict together. Based on three case studies, this article offers a middle-ground scenario-based approach, focusing on disaster governance in authoritarian contexts experiencing low-intensity conflict. Low-intensity conflict is characterized by intense political tensions and violence that is more readily expressed in ways other than direct physical harm. Inspired by Olson’s (2000) maxim that disasters are intrinsically political, this article explores the politics of disaster response by asking what is at stake and what happened, unpacking these questions for state, civil society, and international humanitarian actors. Using data from a total of one year of qualitative fieldwork, the article analyzes disaster governance in 2016 drought-ridden Ethiopia, marked by protests and a State of Emergency; 2015 flooded Myanmar, characterized by explosive identity politics; and 2016–2019 drought-ridden Zimbabwe, with its intense socioeconomic and political turbulence. The study’s findings show how framing and power processes in disaster governance—comprising state and non-state actors—largely lean toward the state, with the consequence that political interests, rather than needs assessments, steer who and what will be protected from disaster impact.Cogitatioapplication/pdfen-USPolitics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): The Politics of Disaster Governance; 343-3542183-2463engjournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501literatureVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
spellingShingle Disaster Governance in Conflict-Affected Authoritarian Contexts: The Cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe
Desportes, Isabelle
authoritarianism; conflict; disaster response; Ethiopia; governance; humanitarian; Myanmar; politics; Zimbabwe
status_str VoR
subject.fl_str_mv authoritarianism; conflict; disaster response; Ethiopia; governance; humanitarian; Myanmar; politics; Zimbabwe
title Disaster Governance in Conflict-Affected Authoritarian Contexts: The Cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe
title_full Disaster Governance in Conflict-Affected Authoritarian Contexts: The Cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Disaster Governance in Conflict-Affected Authoritarian Contexts: The Cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Disaster Governance in Conflict-Affected Authoritarian Contexts: The Cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe
title_short Disaster Governance in Conflict-Affected Authoritarian Contexts: The Cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe
title_sort Disaster Governance in Conflict-Affected Authoritarian Contexts: The Cases of Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe
topic authoritarianism; conflict; disaster response; Ethiopia; governance; humanitarian; Myanmar; politics; Zimbabwe
topic_facet authoritarianism; conflict; disaster response; Ethiopia; governance; humanitarian; Myanmar; politics; Zimbabwe
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3127
visible 1