Publication

Emotional Interest Representation and the Politics of Risk in Child Protection

View document

Bibliographic Details
Summary:This article explores the emotional dimensions of political representation by British Members of Parliament (MP) in relation to child protection. The public speech acts and first-hand accounts of three MPs are drawn upon as examples. These highlight different forms of emotional interest representation that arise following the death of a local child from severe abuse or neglect and in response to anxieties in the community about risk. Firstly, I examine the role of the MP in seeking to embody their constituency in the public expression of collective emotional responses and to defend it from feelings of guilt and shame. Personal feelings of guilt and a consciousness of the politician’s role in attributing blame are then considered. Thirdly, I explore the role of the MP as trusted envoy for anxieties about risk to individual children within their constituencies. The article draws on Berezin’s concept of the secure state and Hochschild’s notion of politicians as feeling legislators, and is based on qualitative documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with MPs. It is argued that the emotional processes outlined are central to understanding the problematic relationship between politics and state social work that fuels the cycle of crisis and reform in children’s services in the UK.
Main Authors:Warner, Jo
Subject:child protection; emotion; Members of Parliament; representation; risk; social work
Year:2018
Country:Portugal
Document type:article
Access type:unknown
Associated institution:Cogitatio Press
Language:English
Origin:Politics and Governance
_version_ 1869524717467074560
author Warner, Jo
author_facet Warner, Jo
author_role author
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Warner, Jo\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Warner, Jo
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv child protection; emotion; Members of Parliament; representation; risk; social work
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Emotional Interest Representation and the Politics of Risk in Child Protection
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Warner, Jo
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i4.1521
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 6, No 4 (2018): Interdisciplinary Approaches to Studying Emotions within Politics and International Relations; 73-82
2183-2463
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv child protection; emotion; Members of Parliament; representation; risk; social work
dc.title.fl_str_mv Emotional Interest Representation and the Politics of Risk in Child Protection
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description This article explores the emotional dimensions of political representation by British Members of Parliament (MP) in relation to child protection. The public speech acts and first-hand accounts of three MPs are drawn upon as examples. These highlight different forms of emotional interest representation that arise following the death of a local child from severe abuse or neglect and in response to anxieties in the community about risk. Firstly, I examine the role of the MP in seeking to embody their constituency in the public expression of collective emotional responses and to defend it from feelings of guilt and shame. Personal feelings of guilt and a consciousness of the politician’s role in attributing blame are then considered. Thirdly, I explore the role of the MP as trusted envoy for anxieties about risk to individual children within their constituencies. The article draws on Berezin’s concept of the secure state and Hochschild’s notion of politicians as feeling legislators, and is based on qualitative documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with MPs. It is argued that the emotional processes outlined are central to understanding the problematic relationship between politics and state social work that fuels the cycle of crisis and reform in children’s services in the UK.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv unknown
format article
id pg_381a2b034f649ed54656d4a799ce6ecc
identifier.doi.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i4.1521
inst_facet_str urn:organizationAcronym:cp{{{_:::_}}}Cogitatio Press
instacron_str cp
institution Cogitatio Press
instname_str Cogitatio Press
language eng
network_acronym_str pg
network_name_str Politics and Governance
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1521
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:cp
person_str_mv Warner, Jo
publishDate 2018
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
repo_facet_str urn:repositoryAcronym:pg{{{_:::_}}}Politics and Governance
reponame_str Politics and Governance
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
spelling en-USEmotional Interest Representation and the Politics of Risk in Child ProtectionWarner, Jochild protection; emotion; Members of Parliament; representation; risk; social workCopyright (c) 2018 Jo Warnerhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i4.1521DOIoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1521OAIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1521URLhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i4.1521DOIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1521/1521URLHasVersion2018-12-28en-USThis article explores the emotional dimensions of political representation by British Members of Parliament (MP) in relation to child protection. The public speech acts and first-hand accounts of three MPs are drawn upon as examples. These highlight different forms of emotional interest representation that arise following the death of a local child from severe abuse or neglect and in response to anxieties in the community about risk. Firstly, I examine the role of the MP in seeking to embody their constituency in the public expression of collective emotional responses and to defend it from feelings of guilt and shame. Personal feelings of guilt and a consciousness of the politician’s role in attributing blame are then considered. Thirdly, I explore the role of the MP as trusted envoy for anxieties about risk to individual children within their constituencies. The article draws on Berezin’s concept of the secure state and Hochschild’s notion of politicians as feeling legislators, and is based on qualitative documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with MPs. It is argued that the emotional processes outlined are central to understanding the problematic relationship between politics and state social work that fuels the cycle of crisis and reform in children’s services in the UK.Cogitatioapplication/pdfen-USPolitics and Governance; Vol 6, No 4 (2018): Interdisciplinary Approaches to Studying Emotions within Politics and International Relations; 73-822183-2463engjournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501literatureVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
spellingShingle Emotional Interest Representation and the Politics of Risk in Child Protection
Warner, Jo
child protection; emotion; Members of Parliament; representation; risk; social work
status SINGLETON
status_str VoR
subject.fl_str_mv child protection; emotion; Members of Parliament; representation; risk; social work
title Emotional Interest Representation and the Politics of Risk in Child Protection
title_full Emotional Interest Representation and the Politics of Risk in Child Protection
title_fullStr Emotional Interest Representation and the Politics of Risk in Child Protection
title_full_unstemmed Emotional Interest Representation and the Politics of Risk in Child Protection
title_short Emotional Interest Representation and the Politics of Risk in Child Protection
title_sort Emotional Interest Representation and the Politics of Risk in Child Protection
topic child protection; emotion; Members of Parliament; representation; risk; social work
topic_facet child protection; emotion; Members of Parliament; representation; risk; social work
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i4.1521
visible 1