Publicação

New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:As Brexit removes the Nordic countries’ most powerful ally from the EU, what does this imply for their approach to European affairs? The literature on small states within the EU suggests that they can counterbalance limited bargaining capacities by entering two types of alliances: strategic partnerships with bigger member states and institutionalised cooperation on a regional basis. Against this backdrop we ask whether, by significantly raising the costs of non-cooperation for Nordic governments, the Brexit referendum has triggered a revival of Nordic political cooperation. We scrutinise this conjecture by analysing Nordic strategies of coalition-building on EU financial and budgetary policy, specifically looking at attempts to reform Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union and proposals to strengthen the EU’s fiscal powers. We find that Nordic governments have successfully collaborated on these issues in the context of new alliances such as the ‘New Hanseatic League’ or the ‘Frugal Four.’ Yet, their coalition-building strategies rely on relatively loose and issue-specific alliances rather than an institutionalisation of Nordic political cooperation, implying that this revival of Nordic political cooperation hardly involves the institutions of ‘official’ Nordic cooperation. We argue that this reflects lasting differences among the Nordics’ approach to the EU as well as electorates’ scepticism about supranational institution-building, implying that ‘reluctant Europeans’ are often also ‘reluctant Scandinavians.’
Autores principais:Schulz, Daniel F.
Outros Autores:Henökl, Thomas
Assunto:Brexit; budgetary politics; Economic and Monetary Union; fiscal integration; intergovernmentalism; Nordic cooperation; small states
Ano:2020
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:unknown
Instituição associada:Cogitatio Press
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Politics and Governance
_version_ 1869524717269942272
author Schulz, Daniel F.
author2 Henökl, Thomas
author2_role author
author_facet Schulz, Daniel F.
Henökl, Thomas
author_role author
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Schulz, Daniel F.\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Henökl, Thomas\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Schulz, Daniel F.
Henökl, Thomas
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv Brexit; budgetary politics; Economic and Monetary Union; fiscal integration; intergovernmentalism; Nordic cooperation; small states
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Schulz, Daniel F.
Henökl, Thomas
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3359
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Rediscovering Nordic Cooperation; 78-88
2183-2463
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Brexit; budgetary politics; Economic and Monetary Union; fiscal integration; intergovernmentalism; Nordic cooperation; small states
dc.title.fl_str_mv New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description As Brexit removes the Nordic countries’ most powerful ally from the EU, what does this imply for their approach to European affairs? The literature on small states within the EU suggests that they can counterbalance limited bargaining capacities by entering two types of alliances: strategic partnerships with bigger member states and institutionalised cooperation on a regional basis. Against this backdrop we ask whether, by significantly raising the costs of non-cooperation for Nordic governments, the Brexit referendum has triggered a revival of Nordic political cooperation. We scrutinise this conjecture by analysing Nordic strategies of coalition-building on EU financial and budgetary policy, specifically looking at attempts to reform Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union and proposals to strengthen the EU’s fiscal powers. We find that Nordic governments have successfully collaborated on these issues in the context of new alliances such as the ‘New Hanseatic League’ or the ‘Frugal Four.’ Yet, their coalition-building strategies rely on relatively loose and issue-specific alliances rather than an institutionalisation of Nordic political cooperation, implying that this revival of Nordic political cooperation hardly involves the institutions of ‘official’ Nordic cooperation. We argue that this reflects lasting differences among the Nordics’ approach to the EU as well as electorates’ scepticism about supranational institution-building, implying that ‘reluctant Europeans’ are often also ‘reluctant Scandinavians.’
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv unknown
format article
id pg_3b2fd0e1fffff5b5e94c585bfbd85e67
identifier.doi.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3359
inst_facet_str urn:organizationAcronym:cp{{{_:::_}}}Cogitatio Press
instacron_str cp
institution Cogitatio Press
instname_str Cogitatio Press
language eng
network_acronym_str pg
network_name_str Politics and Governance
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3359
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:cp
person_str_mv Schulz, Daniel F.
Henökl, Thomas
publishDate 2020
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
repo_facet_str urn:repositoryAcronym:pg{{{_:::_}}}Politics and Governance
reponame_str Politics and Governance
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
spelling en-USNew Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?Schulz, Daniel F.Henökl, ThomasBrexit; budgetary politics; Economic and Monetary Union; fiscal integration; intergovernmentalism; Nordic cooperation; small statesCopyright (c) 2020 Daniel F. Schulz, Thomas Henöklhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3359DOIoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3359OAIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3359URLhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3359DOIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3359/3359URLHasVersion2020-11-03en-USAs Brexit removes the Nordic countries’ most powerful ally from the EU, what does this imply for their approach to European affairs? The literature on small states within the EU suggests that they can counterbalance limited bargaining capacities by entering two types of alliances: strategic partnerships with bigger member states and institutionalised cooperation on a regional basis. Against this backdrop we ask whether, by significantly raising the costs of non-cooperation for Nordic governments, the Brexit referendum has triggered a revival of Nordic political cooperation. We scrutinise this conjecture by analysing Nordic strategies of coalition-building on EU financial and budgetary policy, specifically looking at attempts to reform Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union and proposals to strengthen the EU’s fiscal powers. We find that Nordic governments have successfully collaborated on these issues in the context of new alliances such as the ‘New Hanseatic League’ or the ‘Frugal Four.’ Yet, their coalition-building strategies rely on relatively loose and issue-specific alliances rather than an institutionalisation of Nordic political cooperation, implying that this revival of Nordic political cooperation hardly involves the institutions of ‘official’ Nordic cooperation. We argue that this reflects lasting differences among the Nordics’ approach to the EU as well as electorates’ scepticism about supranational institution-building, implying that ‘reluctant Europeans’ are often also ‘reluctant Scandinavians.’Cogitatioapplication/pdfen-USPolitics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Rediscovering Nordic Cooperation; 78-882183-2463engjournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501literatureVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
spellingShingle New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?
Schulz, Daniel F.
Brexit; budgetary politics; Economic and Monetary Union; fiscal integration; intergovernmentalism; Nordic cooperation; small states
status SINGLETON
status_str VoR
subject.fl_str_mv Brexit; budgetary politics; Economic and Monetary Union; fiscal integration; intergovernmentalism; Nordic cooperation; small states
title New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?
title_full New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?
title_fullStr New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?
title_full_unstemmed New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?
title_short New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?
title_sort New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?
topic Brexit; budgetary politics; Economic and Monetary Union; fiscal integration; intergovernmentalism; Nordic cooperation; small states
topic_facet Brexit; budgetary politics; Economic and Monetary Union; fiscal integration; intergovernmentalism; Nordic cooperation; small states
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3359
visible 1