Publicação

Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:This article argues that a thoroughgoing and meaningful food democracy should entail something closely akin to ‘radical’ food sovereignty, a political programme which confronts the key social relational bases of capitalism. The latter comprise, in essence, ‘primitive accumulation,’ the alienability or commodification of land and other fundamental use values, and market dependence. A thoroughgoing food democracy of this kind thus challenges the structural separation of the ‘economic’ and ‘political’ spheres within capitalism and the modern state (the state-capital nexus), a separation which enables purely political rights and obligations (‘political’ freedom or formal democracy) whilst simultaneously leaving unconstrained the economic powers of capital and their operation through market dependence (‘economic’ unfreedom or the lack of substantive democracy). We argue that much ‘food democracy’ discourse remains confined to this level of ‘political’ freedom and that, if food sovereignty is to be realized, this movement needs to address ‘economic’ unfreedom, in other words, to subvert capitalist social-property relations. We argue further that the political economy of food constitutes but a subset of these wider social relations, such that substantive food democracy is seen here to entail, like ‘radical’ food sovereignty, an abrogation of the three pillars upholding capitalism (primitive accumulation, absolute property rights, market dependence) as an intrinsic part of a wider and more integrated movement towards livelihood sovereignty. We argue here that the abrogation of these conditions upholding the state-capital nexus constitutes an essential part of the transformation of capitalist social-property relations towards common ‘ownership’―or, better, stewardship―of the means of livelihood, of which substantive food democracy is a key component.
Autores principais:Tilzey, Mark
Assunto:agrarian democracy; counter-hegemony; food democracy; food sovereignty
Ano:2019
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:unknown
Instituição associada:Cogitatio Press
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Politics and Governance
_version_ 1869524717815201792
author Tilzey, Mark
author_facet Tilzey, Mark
author_role author
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Tilzey, Mark\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Tilzey, Mark
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv agrarian democracy; counter-hegemony; food democracy; food sovereignty
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tilzey, Mark
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i4.2091
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 7, No 4 (2019): New Perspectives on Food Democracy; 202-213
2183-2463
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv agrarian democracy; counter-hegemony; food democracy; food sovereignty
dc.title.fl_str_mv Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description This article argues that a thoroughgoing and meaningful food democracy should entail something closely akin to ‘radical’ food sovereignty, a political programme which confronts the key social relational bases of capitalism. The latter comprise, in essence, ‘primitive accumulation,’ the alienability or commodification of land and other fundamental use values, and market dependence. A thoroughgoing food democracy of this kind thus challenges the structural separation of the ‘economic’ and ‘political’ spheres within capitalism and the modern state (the state-capital nexus), a separation which enables purely political rights and obligations (‘political’ freedom or formal democracy) whilst simultaneously leaving unconstrained the economic powers of capital and their operation through market dependence (‘economic’ unfreedom or the lack of substantive democracy). We argue that much ‘food democracy’ discourse remains confined to this level of ‘political’ freedom and that, if food sovereignty is to be realized, this movement needs to address ‘economic’ unfreedom, in other words, to subvert capitalist social-property relations. We argue further that the political economy of food constitutes but a subset of these wider social relations, such that substantive food democracy is seen here to entail, like ‘radical’ food sovereignty, an abrogation of the three pillars upholding capitalism (primitive accumulation, absolute property rights, market dependence) as an intrinsic part of a wider and more integrated movement towards livelihood sovereignty. We argue here that the abrogation of these conditions upholding the state-capital nexus constitutes an essential part of the transformation of capitalist social-property relations towards common ‘ownership’―or, better, stewardship―of the means of livelihood, of which substantive food democracy is a key component.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv unknown
format article
id pg_d36e07b5f4e167369dbdf0bdcd4bc6e3
identifier.doi.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i4.2091
inst_facet_str urn:organizationAcronym:cp{{{_:::_}}}Cogitatio Press
instacron_str cp
institution Cogitatio Press
instname_str Cogitatio Press
language eng
network_acronym_str pg
network_name_str Politics and Governance
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2091
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:cp
person_str_mv Tilzey, Mark
publishDate 2019
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
repo_facet_str urn:repositoryAcronym:pg{{{_:::_}}}Politics and Governance
reponame_str Politics and Governance
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:pg
spelling en-USFood Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food RegimeTilzey, Markagrarian democracy; counter-hegemony; food democracy; food sovereigntyCopyright (c) 2019 Mark Tilzeyhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i4.2091DOIoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2091OAIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2091URLhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i4.2091DOIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2091/2091URLHasVersion2019-10-28en-USThis article argues that a thoroughgoing and meaningful food democracy should entail something closely akin to ‘radical’ food sovereignty, a political programme which confronts the key social relational bases of capitalism. The latter comprise, in essence, ‘primitive accumulation,’ the alienability or commodification of land and other fundamental use values, and market dependence. A thoroughgoing food democracy of this kind thus challenges the structural separation of the ‘economic’ and ‘political’ spheres within capitalism and the modern state (the state-capital nexus), a separation which enables purely political rights and obligations (‘political’ freedom or formal democracy) whilst simultaneously leaving unconstrained the economic powers of capital and their operation through market dependence (‘economic’ unfreedom or the lack of substantive democracy). We argue that much ‘food democracy’ discourse remains confined to this level of ‘political’ freedom and that, if food sovereignty is to be realized, this movement needs to address ‘economic’ unfreedom, in other words, to subvert capitalist social-property relations. We argue further that the political economy of food constitutes but a subset of these wider social relations, such that substantive food democracy is seen here to entail, like ‘radical’ food sovereignty, an abrogation of the three pillars upholding capitalism (primitive accumulation, absolute property rights, market dependence) as an intrinsic part of a wider and more integrated movement towards livelihood sovereignty. We argue here that the abrogation of these conditions upholding the state-capital nexus constitutes an essential part of the transformation of capitalist social-property relations towards common ‘ownership’―or, better, stewardship―of the means of livelihood, of which substantive food democracy is a key component.Cogitatioapplication/pdfen-USPolitics and Governance; Vol 7, No 4 (2019): New Perspectives on Food Democracy; 202-2132183-2463engjournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501literatureVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
spellingShingle Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime
Tilzey, Mark
agrarian democracy; counter-hegemony; food democracy; food sovereignty
status SINGLETON
status_str VoR
subject.fl_str_mv agrarian democracy; counter-hegemony; food democracy; food sovereignty
title Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime
title_full Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime
title_fullStr Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime
title_full_unstemmed Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime
title_short Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime
title_sort Food Democracy as ‘Radical’ Food Sovereignty: Agrarian Democracy and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance to the Neo-Imperial Food Regime
topic agrarian democracy; counter-hegemony; food democracy; food sovereignty
topic_facet agrarian democracy; counter-hegemony; food democracy; food sovereignty
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i4.2091
visible 1