Publicação

Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:Background: Although lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important prognostic indicator for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the benefit and indication for lymphadenectomy remain unclear. Methods: Patients diagnosed with ICC between 1990 and 2016 were identified in the international multi-institutional dataset. To determine the survival benefit from lymphadenectomy, the therapeutic index was calculated by multiplying the frequency of LNM in a particular group of patients by the 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate of patients with LNM in that subgroup. Results: Among 471 patients who met the inclusion criteria, approximately half had LNM (n = 205, 43.5%). The median number of resected and metastatic LNs were 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-8] and 0 (IQR 0-1), respectively. Three-year CSS in the entire cohort was 29.9%, reflecting a therapeutic index value of 13.0. The therapeutic index was lower among patients with major vascular invasion (5.4), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 5.0 (8.2), and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament (5.2). Of note, a therapeutic index difference of more than 10 points was noted only when examining the number of LNs harvested [1-2 (4.1) vs. 3-6 (16.1) vs. ≥ 7 (17.8)]. Conclusion: The survival benefit derived from lymphadenectomy was poor among patients with major vascular invasion, CEA > 5.0, and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament. Resection of three or more LNs was associated with the highest therapeutic value among patients with LNM.
Autores principais:Sahara, K
Outros Autores:Tsilimigras, D; Merath, K; Bagante, F; Guglielmi, A; Aldrighetti, L; Weiss, M; Bauer, T; Alexandrescu, S; Poultsides, G; Maithel, S; Pinto Marques, H; Martel, G; Pulitano, C; Shen, F; Soubrane, O; Koerkamp, B; Matsuyama, R; Endo, I; Pawlik, T
Assunto:HCC CIR Aged Female Bile Duct Neoplasms / secondary Bile Duct Neoplasms / surgery* Cholangiocarcinoma / pathology Cholangiocarcinoma / surgery* Male Follow-Up Studies Hepatectomy / mortality* Humans Lymph Node Excision / mortality* Lymph Nodes / pathology* Midlle Aged Lymphatic Metastasis Neoplasm Staging Prognosis Survival Rate Therapeutic Index*
Ano:2019
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE (CHLC)
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE
_version_ 1868412177468096512
author Sahara, K
author2 Tsilimigras, D
Merath, K
Bagante, F
Guglielmi, A
Aldrighetti, L
Weiss, M
Bauer, T
Alexandrescu, S
Poultsides, G
Maithel, S
Pinto Marques, H
Martel, G
Pulitano, C
Shen, F
Soubrane, O
Koerkamp, B
Matsuyama, R
Endo, I
Pawlik, T
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author_facet Sahara, K
Tsilimigras, D
Merath, K
Bagante, F
Guglielmi, A
Aldrighetti, L
Weiss, M
Bauer, T
Alexandrescu, S
Poultsides, G
Maithel, S
Pinto Marques, H
Martel, G
Pulitano, C
Shen, F
Soubrane, O
Koerkamp, B
Matsuyama, R
Endo, I
Pawlik, T
author_role author
contributor_name_str_mv Repositório da Unidade Local de Saúde São José
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Sahara, K\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Tsilimigras, D\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Merath, K\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Bagante, F\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Guglielmi, A\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Aldrighetti, L\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Weiss, M\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Bauer, T\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Alexandrescu, S\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Poultsides, G\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Maithel, S\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Pinto Marques, H\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Martel, G\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Pulitano, C\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Shen, F\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Soubrane, O\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Koerkamp, B\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Matsuyama, R\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Endo, I\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Pawlik, T\"}]
datacite.contributors.contributor.contributorName.fl_str_mv Repositório da Unidade Local de Saúde São José
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Sahara, K
Tsilimigras, D
Merath, K
Bagante, F
Guglielmi, A
Aldrighetti, L
Weiss, M
Bauer, T
Alexandrescu, S
Poultsides, G
Maithel, S
Pinto Marques, H
Martel, G
Pulitano, C
Shen, F
Soubrane, O
Koerkamp, B
Matsuyama, R
Endo, I
Pawlik, T
datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
datacite.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-10-08T14:38:31Z
datacite.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2021-10-08T14:38:31Z
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv HCC CIR
Aged
Female
Bile Duct Neoplasms / secondary
Bile Duct Neoplasms / surgery*
Cholangiocarcinoma / pathology
Cholangiocarcinoma / surgery*
Male
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy / mortality*
Humans
Lymph Node Excision / mortality*
Lymph Nodes / pathology*
Midlle Aged
Lymphatic Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Therapeutic Index*
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Unidade Local de Saúde São José
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sahara, K
Tsilimigras, D
Merath, K
Bagante, F
Guglielmi, A
Aldrighetti, L
Weiss, M
Bauer, T
Alexandrescu, S
Poultsides, G
Maithel, S
Pinto Marques, H
Martel, G
Pulitano, C
Shen, F
Soubrane, O
Koerkamp, B
Matsuyama, R
Endo, I
Pawlik, T
dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-10-08T14:38:31Z
dc.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2021-10-08T14:38:31Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3871
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv HCC CIR
Aged
Female
Bile Duct Neoplasms / secondary
Bile Duct Neoplasms / surgery*
Cholangiocarcinoma / pathology
Cholangiocarcinoma / surgery*
Male
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy / mortality*
Humans
Lymph Node Excision / mortality*
Lymph Nodes / pathology*
Midlle Aged
Lymphatic Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Therapeutic Index*
dc.title.fl_str_mv Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description Background: Although lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important prognostic indicator for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the benefit and indication for lymphadenectomy remain unclear. Methods: Patients diagnosed with ICC between 1990 and 2016 were identified in the international multi-institutional dataset. To determine the survival benefit from lymphadenectomy, the therapeutic index was calculated by multiplying the frequency of LNM in a particular group of patients by the 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate of patients with LNM in that subgroup. Results: Among 471 patients who met the inclusion criteria, approximately half had LNM (n = 205, 43.5%). The median number of resected and metastatic LNs were 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-8] and 0 (IQR 0-1), respectively. Three-year CSS in the entire cohort was 29.9%, reflecting a therapeutic index value of 13.0. The therapeutic index was lower among patients with major vascular invasion (5.4), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 5.0 (8.2), and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament (5.2). Of note, a therapeutic index difference of more than 10 points was noted only when examining the number of LNs harvested [1-2 (4.1) vs. 3-6 (16.1) vs. ≥ 7 (17.8)]. Conclusion: The survival benefit derived from lymphadenectomy was poor among patients with major vascular invasion, CEA > 5.0, and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament. Resection of three or more LNs was associated with the highest therapeutic value among patients with LNM.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
fulltext.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.chlc.pt/bitstreams/0d5cbcd4-3537-4235-a010-614009c7a81a/download
id rchlc_55f44e2dfc8d5b8c1940099b1edee157
identifier.url.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3871
instacron_str chlc
institution Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE (CHLC)
instname_str Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE (CHLC)
language eng
network_acronym_str rchlc
network_name_str Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.pt:10400.17/3871
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:chlc
person_str_mv Sahara, K
Tsilimigras, D
Merath, K
Bagante, F
Guglielmi, A
Aldrighetti, L
Weiss, M
Bauer, T
Alexandrescu, S
Poultsides, G
Maithel, S
Pinto Marques, H
Martel, G
Pulitano, C
Shen, F
Soubrane, O
Koerkamp, B
Matsuyama, R
Endo, I
Pawlik, T
publishDate 2019
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
reponame_str Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:rchlc
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:rchlc
spelling engSpringerpt_PTBackground: Although lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important prognostic indicator for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), the benefit and indication for lymphadenectomy remain unclear. Methods: Patients diagnosed with ICC between 1990 and 2016 were identified in the international multi-institutional dataset. To determine the survival benefit from lymphadenectomy, the therapeutic index was calculated by multiplying the frequency of LNM in a particular group of patients by the 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate of patients with LNM in that subgroup. Results: Among 471 patients who met the inclusion criteria, approximately half had LNM (n = 205, 43.5%). The median number of resected and metastatic LNs were 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-8] and 0 (IQR 0-1), respectively. Three-year CSS in the entire cohort was 29.9%, reflecting a therapeutic index value of 13.0. The therapeutic index was lower among patients with major vascular invasion (5.4), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 5.0 (8.2), and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament (5.2). Of note, a therapeutic index difference of more than 10 points was noted only when examining the number of LNs harvested [1-2 (4.1) vs. 3-6 (16.1) vs. ≥ 7 (17.8)]. Conclusion: The survival benefit derived from lymphadenectomy was poor among patients with major vascular invasion, CEA > 5.0, and LNM in areas other than the hepatoduodenal ligament. Resection of three or more LNs was associated with the highest therapeutic value among patients with LNM.application/pdfpt_PTTherapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?Sahara, KTsilimigras, DMerath, KBagante, FGuglielmi, AAldrighetti, LWeiss, MBauer, TAlexandrescu, SPoultsides, GMaithel, SPinto Marques, HMartel, GPulitano, CShen, FSoubrane, OKoerkamp, BMatsuyama, REndo, IPawlik, THostingInstitutionOrganizationalRepositório da Unidade Local de Saúde São Josée-mailmailto:repositorio@ulssjose.min-saude.ptrepositorio@ulssjose.min-saude.ptDOIIsPartOf10.1245/s10434-019-07483-9.2021-10-08T14:38:31Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00ZHandlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3871http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2open accessHCC CIRAgedFemaleBile Duct Neoplasms / secondaryBile Duct Neoplasms / surgery*Cholangiocarcinoma / pathologyCholangiocarcinoma / surgery*MaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomy / mortality*HumansLymph Node Excision / mortality*Lymph Nodes / pathology*Midlle AgedLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSurvival RateTherapeutic Index*323125 bytesliteraturehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2application/pdffulltexthttps://repositorio.chlc.pt/bitstreams/0d5cbcd4-3537-4235-a010-614009c7a81a/downloadAnnals of Surgical Oncology2629592968
spellingShingle Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?
Sahara, K
HCC CIR
Aged
Female
Bile Duct Neoplasms / secondary
Bile Duct Neoplasms / surgery*
Cholangiocarcinoma / pathology
Cholangiocarcinoma / surgery*
Male
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy / mortality*
Humans
Lymph Node Excision / mortality*
Lymph Nodes / pathology*
Midlle Aged
Lymphatic Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Therapeutic Index*
status SINGLETON
subject.fl_str_mv HCC CIR
Aged
Female
Bile Duct Neoplasms / secondary
Bile Duct Neoplasms / surgery*
Cholangiocarcinoma / pathology
Cholangiocarcinoma / surgery*
Male
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy / mortality*
Humans
Lymph Node Excision / mortality*
Lymph Nodes / pathology*
Midlle Aged
Lymphatic Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Therapeutic Index*
title Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?
title_full Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?
title_fullStr Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?
title_short Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?
title_sort Therapeutic Index Associated with Lymphadenectomy Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most from Nodal Evaluation?
topic HCC CIR
Aged
Female
Bile Duct Neoplasms / secondary
Bile Duct Neoplasms / surgery*
Cholangiocarcinoma / pathology
Cholangiocarcinoma / surgery*
Male
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy / mortality*
Humans
Lymph Node Excision / mortality*
Lymph Nodes / pathology*
Midlle Aged
Lymphatic Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Therapeutic Index*
topic_facet HCC CIR
Aged
Female
Bile Duct Neoplasms / secondary
Bile Duct Neoplasms / surgery*
Cholangiocarcinoma / pathology
Cholangiocarcinoma / surgery*
Male
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy / mortality*
Humans
Lymph Node Excision / mortality*
Lymph Nodes / pathology*
Midlle Aged
Lymphatic Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Survival Rate
Therapeutic Index*
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/3871
visible 1