Publicação
A comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques in activated sludge morphological characterization
| Resumo: | Different approaches using microscopy image analysis procedures were employed for characterization of activated sludge systems. The approaches varied mainly on the type of visualization and acquisition method used for collection of data. In this context, this study focused on the comparison of the two most common acquisition methods: bright field and phase-contrast microscopy. Images were acquired from seven different wastewater treatment plants for a combined period of two years. Advantages and disadvantages of each acquisition technique and the results are discussed. Bright field microscopy proved to be more simple and inexpensive and provided the best overall results. |
|---|---|
| Autores principais: | Mesquita, D. P. |
| Outros Autores: | Dias, Oscar; Amaral, A. L.; Ferreira, Eugénio C. |
| Assunto: | Activated sludge Image analysis Bright field Phase contrast Aggregates Filaments |
| Ano: | 2010 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Tipo de acesso: | acesso aberto |
| Instituição associada: | Universidade do Minho |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| Origem: | RepositóriUM - Universidade do Minho |
| _version_ | 1866877396104249344 |
|---|---|
| author | Mesquita, D. P. |
| author2 | Dias, Oscar Amaral, A. L. Ferreira, Eugénio C. |
| author2_role | author author author |
| author_facet | Mesquita, D. P. Dias, Oscar Amaral, A. L. Ferreira, Eugénio C. |
| author_role | author |
| contributor_name_str_mv | Universidade do Minho |
| country_str | PT |
| creators_json_txt | [{\"Person.name\":\"Mesquita, D. P.\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Dias, Oscar\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Amaral, A. L.\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Ferreira, Eugénio C.\"}] |
| datacite.contributors.contributor.contributorName.fl_str_mv | Universidade do Minho |
| datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv | Mesquita, D. P. Dias, Oscar Amaral, A. L. Ferreira, Eugénio C. |
| datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv | 2010-04-01T00:00:00Z |
| datacite.date.available.fl_str_mv | 2010-04-14T11:46:01Z |
| datacite.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv | 2010-04-14T11:46:01Z |
| datacite.rights.fl_str_mv | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv | Activated sludge Image analysis Bright field Phase contrast Aggregates Filaments |
| datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv | A comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques in activated sludge morphological characterization |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv | Universidade do Minho |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Mesquita, D. P. Dias, Oscar Amaral, A. L. Ferreira, Eugénio C. |
| dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv | 2010-04-01T00:00:00Z |
| dc.date.available.fl_str_mv | 2010-04-14T11:46:01Z |
| dc.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv | 2010-04-14T11:46:01Z |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/10530 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | eng |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Microscopy Society of America |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Activated sludge Image analysis Bright field Phase contrast Aggregates Filaments |
| dc.title.fl_str_mv | A comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques in activated sludge morphological characterization |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| description | Different approaches using microscopy image analysis procedures were employed for characterization of activated sludge systems. The approaches varied mainly on the type of visualization and acquisition method used for collection of data. In this context, this study focused on the comparison of the two most common acquisition methods: bright field and phase-contrast microscopy. Images were acquired from seven different wastewater treatment plants for a combined period of two years. Advantages and disadvantages of each acquisition technique and the results are discussed. Bright field microscopy proved to be more simple and inexpensive and provided the best overall results. |
| dirty | 0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| fulltext.url.fl_str_mv | https://prod-dspace.uminho.pt/bitstreams/9fd2917f-48c7-4ff1-a576-29512c59824e/download |
| id | rum_7ef09c19f7259768bc9c4d8a47d420f9 |
| identifier.url.fl_str_mv | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/10530 |
| instacron_str | repositorium |
| institution | Universidade do Minho |
| instname_str | Universidade do Minho |
| language | eng |
| network_acronym_str | rum |
| network_name_str | RepositóriUM - Universidade do Minho |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:repositorium.uminho.pt:1822/10530 |
| organization_str_mv | urn:organizationAcronym:repositorium |
| person_str_mv | Mesquita, D. P. Dias, Oscar Amaral, A. L. Ferreira, Eugénio C. |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Microscopy Society of America |
| reponame_str | RepositóriUM - Universidade do Minho |
| repository_id_str | urn:repositoryAcronym:rum |
| service_str_mv | urn:repositoryAcronym:rum |
| spelling | engMicroscopy Society of AmericaporDifferent approaches using microscopy image analysis procedures were employed for characterization of activated sludge systems. The approaches varied mainly on the type of visualization and acquisition method used for collection of data. In this context, this study focused on the comparison of the two most common acquisition methods: bright field and phase-contrast microscopy. Images were acquired from seven different wastewater treatment plants for a combined period of two years. Advantages and disadvantages of each acquisition technique and the results are discussed. Bright field microscopy proved to be more simple and inexpensive and provided the best overall results.application/pdfporA comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques in activated sludge morphological characterizationMesquita, D. P.Dias, OscarAmaral, A. L.Ferreira, Eugénio C.HostingInstitutionOrganizationalUniversidade do Minhoe-mailmailto:repositorium@usdb.uminho.ptrepositorium@usdb.uminho.ptISSNIsPartOf1431-9276ISSNIsPartOf1435-8115DOIIsPartOf10.1017/S14319276099913582010-04-14T11:46:01Z2010-042010-04-01T00:00:00ZHandlehttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/10530http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2open accessActivated sludgeImage analysisBright fieldPhase contrastAggregatesFilaments337707 bytesliteraturehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2application/pdffulltexthttps://prod-dspace.uminho.pt/bitstreams/9fd2917f-48c7-4ff1-a576-29512c59824e/download |
| spellingShingle | A comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques in activated sludge morphological characterization Mesquita, D. P. Activated sludge Image analysis Bright field Phase contrast Aggregates Filaments |
| status | SINGLETON |
| subject.fl_str_mv | Activated sludge Image analysis Bright field Phase contrast Aggregates Filaments |
| title | A comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques in activated sludge morphological characterization |
| title_full | A comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques in activated sludge morphological characterization |
| title_fullStr | A comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques in activated sludge morphological characterization |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques in activated sludge morphological characterization |
| title_short | A comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques in activated sludge morphological characterization |
| title_sort | A comparison between bright field and phase-contrast image analysis techniques in activated sludge morphological characterization |
| topic | Activated sludge Image analysis Bright field Phase contrast Aggregates Filaments |
| topic_facet | Activated sludge Image analysis Bright field Phase contrast Aggregates Filaments |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/10530 |
| visible | 1 |