Publicação
Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law
| Resumo: | From its inception, the academic study of EU administrative law has relied heavily on doctrinal categories, such as concepts and principles, borrowed from the administrative law of the Member States. It has largely preferred research agendas such as the Europeanisation of national administrative law, and the development of common principles derived from national administrative laws. Legal doctrine has also engaged in the critique of EU administrative law when it fails to account for the normative standards that national administrative law must usually observe. Whereas all these constitute important research agendas, they reproduce in particularly acute terms a familiar paradox. While the existence of a European administration and administrative law beyond the state cannot be seriously disputed today, legal doctrine tends to consider them, implicitly or explicitly, from the perspective of the administrative law of the nation state. The so-called 'touch of stateness' has had a firm grip on EU administrative law, even though it includes unique aspects that lack any precedent in national laws. The article considers, and proposes a methodological approach to address, the ways in which preconceptions and normative expectations originating in national law have conditioned, and indeed prevented, the deeper doctrinal development of EU administrative law. |
|---|---|
| Autores principais: | Brito Bastos, Filipe Brito |
| Assunto: | EU Administrative Law Legal Doctrine Methodology European Polity Paradox Interdisciplinarity SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions |
| Ano: | 2021 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Tipo de acesso: | acesso aberto |
| Instituição associada: | Universidade Nova de Lisboa |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| Origem: | Repositório Institucional da UNL |
| _version_ | 1868983546489602048 |
|---|---|
| author | Brito Bastos, Filipe Brito |
| author_facet | Brito Bastos, Filipe Brito |
| author_role | author |
| contributor_name_str_mv | Centro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento sobre Direito e Sociedade (CEDIS) NOVA School of Law|Faculdade de Direito (NSL|FD) Cambridge University Press RUN |
| country_str | PT |
| creators_json_txt | [{\"Person.name\":\"Brito Bastos, Filipe Brito\"}] |
| datacite.contributors.contributor.contributorName.fl_str_mv | Centro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento sobre Direito e Sociedade (CEDIS) NOVA School of Law|Faculdade de Direito (NSL|FD) Cambridge University Press RUN |
| datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv | Brito Bastos, Filipe Brito |
| datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv | 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| datacite.date.available.fl_str_mv | 2024-03-21T22:50:05Z |
| datacite.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv | 2024-03-21T22:50:05Z |
| datacite.rights.fl_str_mv | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv | EU Administrative Law Legal Doctrine Methodology European Polity Paradox Interdisciplinarity SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions |
| datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv | Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law Confronting the Touch of Stateness |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv | Centro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento sobre Direito e Sociedade (CEDIS) NOVA School of Law|Faculdade de Direito (NSL|FD) Cambridge University Press RUN |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Brito Bastos, Filipe Brito |
| dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv | 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| dc.date.available.fl_str_mv | 2024-03-21T22:50:05Z |
| dc.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv | 2024-03-21T22:50:05Z |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/165272 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | eng |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | EU Administrative Law Legal Doctrine Methodology European Polity Paradox Interdisciplinarity SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions |
| dc.title.fl_str_mv | Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law Confronting the Touch of Stateness |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| description | From its inception, the academic study of EU administrative law has relied heavily on doctrinal categories, such as concepts and principles, borrowed from the administrative law of the Member States. It has largely preferred research agendas such as the Europeanisation of national administrative law, and the development of common principles derived from national administrative laws. Legal doctrine has also engaged in the critique of EU administrative law when it fails to account for the normative standards that national administrative law must usually observe. Whereas all these constitute important research agendas, they reproduce in particularly acute terms a familiar paradox. While the existence of a European administration and administrative law beyond the state cannot be seriously disputed today, legal doctrine tends to consider them, implicitly or explicitly, from the perspective of the administrative law of the nation state. The so-called 'touch of stateness' has had a firm grip on EU administrative law, even though it includes unique aspects that lack any precedent in national laws. The article considers, and proposes a methodological approach to address, the ways in which preconceptions and normative expectations originating in national law have conditioned, and indeed prevented, the deeper doctrinal development of EU administrative law. |
| dirty | 0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| fulltext.url.fl_str_mv | https://run.unl.pt/bitstreams/c5362fcd-036b-4b09-a122-e91ceb81e1ec/download |
| id | run_078d2a50bcbc0b2d2d504bef0f58635a |
| identifier.url.fl_str_mv | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/165272 |
| inst_facet_str | urn:organizationAcronym:unl{{{_:::_}}}Universidade Nova de Lisboa |
| instacron_str | unl |
| institution | Universidade Nova de Lisboa |
| instname_str | Universidade Nova de Lisboa |
| language | eng |
| network_acronym_str | run |
| network_name_str | Repositório Institucional da UNL |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:run.unl.pt:10362/165272 |
| organization_str_mv | urn:organizationAcronym:unl |
| person_str_mv | Brito Bastos, Filipe Brito |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| repo_facet_str | urn:repositoryAcronym:run{{{_:::_}}}Repositório Institucional da UNL |
| reponame_str | Repositório Institucional da UNL |
| repository_id_str | urn:repositoryAcronym:run |
| service_str_mv | urn:repositoryAcronym:run |
| spelling | engenFrom its inception, the academic study of EU administrative law has relied heavily on doctrinal categories, such as concepts and principles, borrowed from the administrative law of the Member States. It has largely preferred research agendas such as the Europeanisation of national administrative law, and the development of common principles derived from national administrative laws. Legal doctrine has also engaged in the critique of EU administrative law when it fails to account for the normative standards that national administrative law must usually observe. Whereas all these constitute important research agendas, they reproduce in particularly acute terms a familiar paradox. While the existence of a European administration and administrative law beyond the state cannot be seriously disputed today, legal doctrine tends to consider them, implicitly or explicitly, from the perspective of the administrative law of the nation state. The so-called 'touch of stateness' has had a firm grip on EU administrative law, even though it includes unique aspects that lack any precedent in national laws. The article considers, and proposes a methodological approach to address, the ways in which preconceptions and normative expectations originating in national law have conditioned, and indeed prevented, the deeper doctrinal development of EU administrative law.application/pdfenDoctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative LawSubtitleenConfronting the Touch of StatenessBrito Bastos, Filipe BritoCentro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento sobre Direito e Sociedade (CEDIS)NOVA School of Law|Faculdade de Direito (NSL|FD)Cambridge University PressHostingInstitutionOrganizationalRUNe-mailmailto:run@unl.ptrun@unl.ptISSNIsPartOf2071-8322URNIsPartOfPURE: 55081765URNIsPartOfPURE UUID: b2ae5529-58ad-4e69-9ef8-7e1ef36cd205URNIsPartOfORCID: /0000-0002-0485-8878/work/151368421URNIsPartOfScopus: 85110946250DOIIsPartOf10.1017/glj.2021.202024-03-21T22:50:05Z20212021-01-01T00:00:00ZHandlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/165272http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2open accessEU Administrative LawLegal DoctrineMethodologyEuropean Polity ParadoxInterdisciplinaritySDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions661720 bytesliteraturehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2application/pdffulltexthttps://run.unl.pt/bitstreams/c5362fcd-036b-4b09-a122-e91ceb81e1ec/download |
| spellingShingle | Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law Brito Bastos, Filipe Brito EU Administrative Law Legal Doctrine Methodology European Polity Paradox Interdisciplinarity SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions |
| status | SINGLETON |
| subject.fl_str_mv | EU Administrative Law Legal Doctrine Methodology European Polity Paradox Interdisciplinarity SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions |
| title | Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law |
| title_full | Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law |
| title_fullStr | Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law |
| title_full_unstemmed | Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law |
| title_short | Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law |
| title_sort | Doctrinal Methodology in EU Administrative Law |
| topic | EU Administrative Law Legal Doctrine Methodology European Polity Paradox Interdisciplinarity SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions |
| topic_facet | EU Administrative Law Legal Doctrine Methodology European Polity Paradox Interdisciplinarity SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/10362/165272 |
| visible | 1 |