Publicação

Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:Public procurement is of unique importance in the economy of the European Community. With the advent of the promulgation of "Resource Directives" No 89\665\EEC and 92\13\EEC, both amended by Directive 2007\66\EC, public procurement was opened in proportion to the European Union. In the institutional dimension, considering the slowness of the judicial bodies of the Member States, the Resource Directives intended to be the establishment of rapid and effective resources. As a result, EU countries have sought solutions to ensure citizens' right, through the efficient and rapid march of justice, with the effective resolution of their problem in a timely manner. The Portuguese option was for administrative arbitration. On the other hand, 14 EU countries have rehearsed the settlement of their public procurement disputes through the administrative body. It is proposed a reflection on the two models: arbitration and administrative body and on the possibility of the legal system Portuguese adopt the administrative body, in order to resolve conflicts arising from public procurement. To answer this question, a bibliographic study was carried out, on the one hand, of the organization of administrative litigation in Portugal and the alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution that it uses, and on the other hand, an examination of foreign law was carried out. It was concluded that the model of the administrative body is not only an alternative to the administration of state justice, but rather an appropriate means to solve problems related to public procurement. However, at the moment, Portugal should not adopt such a model, but rather improve its administrative arbitration. Specific measures were proposed for possible corrections of the weaknesses of this institute.
Autores principais:Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
Assunto:Arbitragem administrativa Direito da contratação pública Efetividade da justiça administrativa Administrative arbitration Administrative bodies Public Procurement Law Effectiveness of administrative justice
Ano:2022
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:dissertação de mestrado
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Idioma:português
Origem:Repositório Institucional da UNL
_version_ 1867100795185397760
author Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
author_facet Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
author_role author
contributor_name_str_mv Pedro, RIcardo
RUN
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Ramme, Luiza Cecilia\"}]
datacite.contributors.contributor.contributorName.fl_str_mv Pedro, RIcardo
RUN
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2022-01-27T00:00:00Z
datacite.date.available.fl_str_mv 2025-01-27T01:30:41Z
datacite.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2025-01-27T01:30:41Z
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv Arbitragem administrativa
Direito da contratação pública
Efetividade da justiça administrativa
Administrative arbitration
Administrative bodies
Public Procurement Law
Effectiveness of administrative justice
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Pedro, RIcardo
RUN
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2022-01-27T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2025-01-27T01:30:41Z
dc.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2025-01-27T01:30:41Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv por
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Arbitragem administrativa
Direito da contratação pública
Efetividade da justiça administrativa
Administrative arbitration
Administrative bodies
Public Procurement Law
Effectiveness of administrative justice
dc.title.fl_str_mv Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
description Public procurement is of unique importance in the economy of the European Community. With the advent of the promulgation of "Resource Directives" No 89\665\EEC and 92\13\EEC, both amended by Directive 2007\66\EC, public procurement was opened in proportion to the European Union. In the institutional dimension, considering the slowness of the judicial bodies of the Member States, the Resource Directives intended to be the establishment of rapid and effective resources. As a result, EU countries have sought solutions to ensure citizens' right, through the efficient and rapid march of justice, with the effective resolution of their problem in a timely manner. The Portuguese option was for administrative arbitration. On the other hand, 14 EU countries have rehearsed the settlement of their public procurement disputes through the administrative body. It is proposed a reflection on the two models: arbitration and administrative body and on the possibility of the legal system Portuguese adopt the administrative body, in order to resolve conflicts arising from public procurement. To answer this question, a bibliographic study was carried out, on the one hand, of the organization of administrative litigation in Portugal and the alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution that it uses, and on the other hand, an examination of foreign law was carried out. It was concluded that the model of the administrative body is not only an alternative to the administration of state justice, but rather an appropriate means to solve problems related to public procurement. However, at the moment, Portugal should not adopt such a model, but rather improve its administrative arbitration. Specific measures were proposed for possible corrections of the weaknesses of this institute.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format masterThesis
fulltext.url.fl_str_mv https://run.unl.pt/bitstreams/cb39d03a-cc52-4bd2-9308-8d02756cc275/download
id run_7fcab2d25e6df07023b40d283eb74ff2
identifier.url.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149
instacron_str unl
institution Universidade Nova de Lisboa
instname_str Universidade Nova de Lisboa
language por
network_acronym_str run
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNL
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/141149
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:unl
person_str_mv Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
publishDate 2022
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNL
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:run
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:run
spelling porpt_PTPublic procurement is of unique importance in the economy of the European Community. With the advent of the promulgation of "Resource Directives" No 89\665\EEC and 92\13\EEC, both amended by Directive 2007\66\EC, public procurement was opened in proportion to the European Union. In the institutional dimension, considering the slowness of the judicial bodies of the Member States, the Resource Directives intended to be the establishment of rapid and effective resources. As a result, EU countries have sought solutions to ensure citizens' right, through the efficient and rapid march of justice, with the effective resolution of their problem in a timely manner. The Portuguese option was for administrative arbitration. On the other hand, 14 EU countries have rehearsed the settlement of their public procurement disputes through the administrative body. It is proposed a reflection on the two models: arbitration and administrative body and on the possibility of the legal system Portuguese adopt the administrative body, in order to resolve conflicts arising from public procurement. To answer this question, a bibliographic study was carried out, on the one hand, of the organization of administrative litigation in Portugal and the alternative mechanisms of conflict resolution that it uses, and on the other hand, an examination of foreign law was carried out. It was concluded that the model of the administrative body is not only an alternative to the administration of state justice, but rather an appropriate means to solve problems related to public procurement. However, at the moment, Portugal should not adopt such a model, but rather improve its administrative arbitration. Specific measures were proposed for possible corrections of the weaknesses of this institute.application/pdfpt_PTMeios de solução de litígios na contratação públicaRamme, Luiza CeciliaPedro, RIcardoHostingInstitutionOrganizationalRUNe-mailmailto:run@unl.ptrun@unl.ptURNurn:tid:2029925272025-01-27T01:30:41Z2022-01-272021-08-132022-01-27T00:00:00ZHandlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2open accessArbitragem administrativaDireito da contratação públicaEfetividade da justiça administrativaAdministrative arbitrationAdministrative bodiesPublic Procurement LawEffectiveness of administrative justice812504 bytesliteraturehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccmaster thesishttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2application/pdffulltexthttps://run.unl.pt/bitstreams/cb39d03a-cc52-4bd2-9308-8d02756cc275/download
spellingShingle Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
Ramme, Luiza Cecilia
Arbitragem administrativa
Direito da contratação pública
Efetividade da justiça administrativa
Administrative arbitration
Administrative bodies
Public Procurement Law
Effectiveness of administrative justice
status SINGLETON
subject.fl_str_mv Arbitragem administrativa
Direito da contratação pública
Efetividade da justiça administrativa
Administrative arbitration
Administrative bodies
Public Procurement Law
Effectiveness of administrative justice
title Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
title_full Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
title_fullStr Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
title_full_unstemmed Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
title_short Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
title_sort Meios de solução de litígios na contratação pública
topic Arbitragem administrativa
Direito da contratação pública
Efetividade da justiça administrativa
Administrative arbitration
Administrative bodies
Public Procurement Law
Effectiveness of administrative justice
topic_facet Arbitragem administrativa
Direito da contratação pública
Efetividade da justiça administrativa
Administrative arbitration
Administrative bodies
Public Procurement Law
Effectiveness of administrative justice
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/141149
visible 1