Publicação

Cancel, rebook, save

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:Rebooking—canceling a reservation and booking the same stay at a lower rate—creates revenue leakage for hotels, whether the savings go to guests or intermediaries. We analyze 2,223,024 reservations from 628 Portuguese properties (2022–2024) and match cancellations to near-immediate, lower-priced replacement bookings. Rebookings account for 0.94 % of reservations and generate €1,241,281.58 in gross revenue displacement (i.e., the difference between the original and replacement booking values). Rebooking is more frequent in urban markets but typically involves smaller per-stay losses. Losses vary by region, season, and accommodation type. We propose a measurement framework and recommend policies: guardrails on late price cuts, fenced discounts, parity audits, and rebooking risk flags in reservation systems. To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale multi-property estimate of within-property rebooking-related revenue displacement in hotels. Results extend empirical evidence on strategic consumer behavior under dynamic pricing and inform more robust monitoring and pricing safeguards in revenue management practice.
Autores principais:Kmiecik, Martyna
Outros Autores:Antonio, Nuno
Assunto:Rebooking Hospitality Industry Revenue Management Dynamic Pricing Data Science Strategic Consumer Behavior Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management Strategy and Management SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
Ano:2026
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Repositório Institucional da UNL
Descrição
Resumo:Rebooking—canceling a reservation and booking the same stay at a lower rate—creates revenue leakage for hotels, whether the savings go to guests or intermediaries. We analyze 2,223,024 reservations from 628 Portuguese properties (2022–2024) and match cancellations to near-immediate, lower-priced replacement bookings. Rebookings account for 0.94 % of reservations and generate €1,241,281.58 in gross revenue displacement (i.e., the difference between the original and replacement booking values). Rebooking is more frequent in urban markets but typically involves smaller per-stay losses. Losses vary by region, season, and accommodation type. We propose a measurement framework and recommend policies: guardrails on late price cuts, fenced discounts, parity audits, and rebooking risk flags in reservation systems. To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale multi-property estimate of within-property rebooking-related revenue displacement in hotels. Results extend empirical evidence on strategic consumer behavior under dynamic pricing and inform more robust monitoring and pricing safeguards in revenue management practice.