Publicação

The practice of valuation for M&As and the role of advisors

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:This study explores the valuation accuracy of three of the most commonly used models in valuation by financial advisors in a takeover context: the discounted cash flow (DCF), the method of comparable companies and the method of comparable transactions. The motivation for this work is the lack of literature on the topic which motivated an exploratory approach to the issue. The thesis investigates the answer the following research questions: (1) How accurate are the valuation methods? (2) Which valuations method is more reliable? (3) Does the valuation reveals biasness in the valuation taken into consideration the commissioner to whom the financial advisor is reporting to? The hypotheses are tested using a sample of 110 deals that took place in the United States of America and were reported to the Securities Exchange Commission of the same country. The results demonstrate that the expertise advocated by financial advisors is crucial to shrink the range of the valuations. Moreover, the evidence suggests that there seems to be a trade-off between valuation accuracy and range, where DCF method has the largest standard deviation and provides the closest valuation to the acquisition price.
Autores principais:Figueira, Pedro Marques Jardim Salgado
Assunto:Mergers and acquisitions Financial advisors Valuation accuracy
Ano:2018
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:dissertação de mestrado
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Repositório Institucional da UNL
_version_ 1868983279205482496
author Figueira, Pedro Marques Jardim Salgado
author_facet Figueira, Pedro Marques Jardim Salgado
author_role author
contributor_name_str_mv Queiró, Francisco
RUN
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Figueira, Pedro Marques Jardim Salgado\"}]
datacite.contributors.contributor.contributorName.fl_str_mv Queiró, Francisco
RUN
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Figueira, Pedro Marques Jardim Salgado
datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2018-01-20T00:00:00Z
datacite.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-01-20T01:30:30Z
datacite.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2021-01-20T01:30:30Z
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv Mergers and acquisitions
Financial advisors
Valuation accuracy
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv The practice of valuation for M&As and the role of advisors
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Queiró, Francisco
RUN
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Figueira, Pedro Marques Jardim Salgado
dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2018-01-20T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-01-20T01:30:30Z
dc.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2021-01-20T01:30:30Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/37618
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Mergers and acquisitions
Financial advisors
Valuation accuracy
dc.title.fl_str_mv The practice of valuation for M&As and the role of advisors
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
description This study explores the valuation accuracy of three of the most commonly used models in valuation by financial advisors in a takeover context: the discounted cash flow (DCF), the method of comparable companies and the method of comparable transactions. The motivation for this work is the lack of literature on the topic which motivated an exploratory approach to the issue. The thesis investigates the answer the following research questions: (1) How accurate are the valuation methods? (2) Which valuations method is more reliable? (3) Does the valuation reveals biasness in the valuation taken into consideration the commissioner to whom the financial advisor is reporting to? The hypotheses are tested using a sample of 110 deals that took place in the United States of America and were reported to the Securities Exchange Commission of the same country. The results demonstrate that the expertise advocated by financial advisors is crucial to shrink the range of the valuations. Moreover, the evidence suggests that there seems to be a trade-off between valuation accuracy and range, where DCF method has the largest standard deviation and provides the closest valuation to the acquisition price.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format masterThesis
fulltext.url.fl_str_mv https://run.unl.pt/bitstreams/45ccb246-d4af-49ca-8441-97d16c746f7e/download
id run_afdbbfc32205b1caa069c8c2eee59dcc
identifier.url.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/37618
inst_facet_str urn:organizationAcronym:unl{{{_:::_}}}Universidade Nova de Lisboa
instacron_str unl
institution Universidade Nova de Lisboa
instname_str Universidade Nova de Lisboa
language eng
network_acronym_str run
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNL
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/37618
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:unl
person_str_mv Figueira, Pedro Marques Jardim Salgado
publishDate 2018
repo_facet_str urn:repositoryAcronym:run{{{_:::_}}}Repositório Institucional da UNL
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNL
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:run
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:run
spelling engpt_PTThis study explores the valuation accuracy of three of the most commonly used models in valuation by financial advisors in a takeover context: the discounted cash flow (DCF), the method of comparable companies and the method of comparable transactions. The motivation for this work is the lack of literature on the topic which motivated an exploratory approach to the issue. The thesis investigates the answer the following research questions: (1) How accurate are the valuation methods? (2) Which valuations method is more reliable? (3) Does the valuation reveals biasness in the valuation taken into consideration the commissioner to whom the financial advisor is reporting to? The hypotheses are tested using a sample of 110 deals that took place in the United States of America and were reported to the Securities Exchange Commission of the same country. The results demonstrate that the expertise advocated by financial advisors is crucial to shrink the range of the valuations. Moreover, the evidence suggests that there seems to be a trade-off between valuation accuracy and range, where DCF method has the largest standard deviation and provides the closest valuation to the acquisition price.application/pdfpt_PTThe practice of valuation for M&As and the role of advisorsFigueira, Pedro Marques Jardim SalgadoQueiró, FranciscoHostingInstitutionOrganizationalRUNe-mailmailto:run@unl.ptrun@unl.ptURNurn:tid:2018627192021-01-20T01:30:30Z2018-01-202018-01-20T00:00:00ZHandlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/37618http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2open accessMergers and acquisitionsFinancial advisorsValuation accuracy776648 bytesliteraturehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccmaster thesishttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2application/pdffulltexthttps://run.unl.pt/bitstreams/45ccb246-d4af-49ca-8441-97d16c746f7e/download
spellingShingle The practice of valuation for M&As and the role of advisors
Figueira, Pedro Marques Jardim Salgado
Mergers and acquisitions
Financial advisors
Valuation accuracy
status SINGLETON
subject.fl_str_mv Mergers and acquisitions
Financial advisors
Valuation accuracy
title The practice of valuation for M&As and the role of advisors
title_full The practice of valuation for M&As and the role of advisors
title_fullStr The practice of valuation for M&As and the role of advisors
title_full_unstemmed The practice of valuation for M&As and the role of advisors
title_short The practice of valuation for M&As and the role of advisors
title_sort The practice of valuation for M&As and the role of advisors
topic Mergers and acquisitions
Financial advisors
Valuation accuracy
topic_facet Mergers and acquisitions
Financial advisors
Valuation accuracy
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/37618
visible 1