Publicação

The Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Analysis of Developments, Challenges, and Comparison of Different Markets

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:Artificial Intelligence has become a disruptive force in the everyday lives of billions of people worldwide, and the impact it has will only increase in the future. Be it an algorithm that knows precisely what we want before we are consciously aware of it or a fully automized and weaponized drone that decides in a fraction of a second if it may strike a lethal attack or not. Those algorithms are here to stay. Even if the world could come together and ban, e.g., algorithm-based weaponized systems, there would still be many systems that unintentionally harm individuals and whole societies. Therefore, we must think of AI with Ethical considerations to mitigate the harm and bias of human design, especially with the data on which the machine consciousness is created. Although it may just be an algorithm for a simple automated task, like visual classification, the outcome can have discriminatory results with long-term consequences. This thesis explores the developments and challenges of Artificial Intelligence Ethics in different markets based on specific factors, aims to answer scientific questions, and seeks to raise new ones for future research. Furthermore, measurements and approaches for mitigating risks that lead to such harmful algorithmic decisions and identifying global differences in this field are the main objectives of this research.
Autores principais:Natrup, Simon
Assunto:Machine Learning Ethics Artificial Intelligence Ethics Machine Learning Bias Machine Learning Discrimination Trustworthy AI Artificial Intelligence Principles Artificial Intelligence Guidelines
Ano:2022
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:dissertação de mestrado
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Repositório Institucional da UNL
_version_ 1868983659680235520
author Natrup, Simon
author_facet Natrup, Simon
author_role author
contributor_name_str_mv Santos, Vítor Manuel Pereira Duarte dos
RUN
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Natrup, Simon\"}]
datacite.contributors.contributor.contributorName.fl_str_mv Santos, Vítor Manuel Pereira Duarte dos
RUN
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Natrup, Simon
datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2022-02-18T00:00:00Z
datacite.date.available.fl_str_mv 2022-03-17T10:49:42Z
datacite.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2022-03-17T10:49:42Z
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv Machine Learning Ethics
Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Machine Learning Bias
Machine Learning Discrimination
Trustworthy AI
Artificial Intelligence Principles
Artificial Intelligence Guidelines
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv The Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Analysis of Developments, Challenges, and Comparison of Different Markets
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Santos, Vítor Manuel Pereira Duarte dos
RUN
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Natrup, Simon
dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2022-02-18T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2022-03-17T10:49:42Z
dc.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2022-03-17T10:49:42Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/134702
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.rights.cclincense.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Machine Learning Ethics
Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Machine Learning Bias
Machine Learning Discrimination
Trustworthy AI
Artificial Intelligence Principles
Artificial Intelligence Guidelines
dc.title.fl_str_mv The Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Analysis of Developments, Challenges, and Comparison of Different Markets
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
description Artificial Intelligence has become a disruptive force in the everyday lives of billions of people worldwide, and the impact it has will only increase in the future. Be it an algorithm that knows precisely what we want before we are consciously aware of it or a fully automized and weaponized drone that decides in a fraction of a second if it may strike a lethal attack or not. Those algorithms are here to stay. Even if the world could come together and ban, e.g., algorithm-based weaponized systems, there would still be many systems that unintentionally harm individuals and whole societies. Therefore, we must think of AI with Ethical considerations to mitigate the harm and bias of human design, especially with the data on which the machine consciousness is created. Although it may just be an algorithm for a simple automated task, like visual classification, the outcome can have discriminatory results with long-term consequences. This thesis explores the developments and challenges of Artificial Intelligence Ethics in different markets based on specific factors, aims to answer scientific questions, and seeks to raise new ones for future research. Furthermore, measurements and approaches for mitigating risks that lead to such harmful algorithmic decisions and identifying global differences in this field are the main objectives of this research.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format masterThesis
fulltext.url.fl_str_mv https://run.unl.pt/bitstreams/c249a296-484c-4dbe-89af-6c3b4d507415/download
id run_eefebfff45966e2be64f1a6a7b2a042e
identifier.url.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/134702
inst_facet_str urn:organizationAcronym:unl{{{_:::_}}}Universidade Nova de Lisboa
instacron_str unl
institution Universidade Nova de Lisboa
instname_str Universidade Nova de Lisboa
language eng
network_acronym_str run
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNL
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/134702
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:unl
person_str_mv Natrup, Simon
publishDate 2022
repo_facet_str urn:repositoryAcronym:run{{{_:::_}}}Repositório Institucional da UNL
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNL
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:run
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:run
spelling engpt_PTArtificial Intelligence has become a disruptive force in the everyday lives of billions of people worldwide, and the impact it has will only increase in the future. Be it an algorithm that knows precisely what we want before we are consciously aware of it or a fully automized and weaponized drone that decides in a fraction of a second if it may strike a lethal attack or not. Those algorithms are here to stay. Even if the world could come together and ban, e.g., algorithm-based weaponized systems, there would still be many systems that unintentionally harm individuals and whole societies. Therefore, we must think of AI with Ethical considerations to mitigate the harm and bias of human design, especially with the data on which the machine consciousness is created. Although it may just be an algorithm for a simple automated task, like visual classification, the outcome can have discriminatory results with long-term consequences. This thesis explores the developments and challenges of Artificial Intelligence Ethics in different markets based on specific factors, aims to answer scientific questions, and seeks to raise new ones for future research. Furthermore, measurements and approaches for mitigating risks that lead to such harmful algorithmic decisions and identifying global differences in this field are the main objectives of this research.application/pdfpt_PTThe Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Analysis of Developments, Challenges, and Comparison of Different MarketsNatrup, SimonSantos, Vítor Manuel Pereira Duarte dosHostingInstitutionOrganizationalRUNe-mailmailto:run@unl.ptrun@unl.ptURNurn:tid:2029663802022-03-17T10:49:42Z2022-02-182022-02-18T00:00:00ZHandlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/134702http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2open accessMachine Learning EthicsArtificial Intelligence EthicsMachine Learning BiasMachine Learning DiscriminationTrustworthy AIArtificial Intelligence PrinciplesArtificial Intelligence Guidelines1838665 bytesliteraturehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccmaster thesis2022-02-18http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2application/pdffulltexthttps://run.unl.pt/bitstreams/c249a296-484c-4dbe-89af-6c3b4d507415/download
spellingShingle The Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Analysis of Developments, Challenges, and Comparison of Different Markets
Natrup, Simon
Machine Learning Ethics
Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Machine Learning Bias
Machine Learning Discrimination
Trustworthy AI
Artificial Intelligence Principles
Artificial Intelligence Guidelines
status SINGLETON
subject.fl_str_mv Machine Learning Ethics
Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Machine Learning Bias
Machine Learning Discrimination
Trustworthy AI
Artificial Intelligence Principles
Artificial Intelligence Guidelines
title The Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Analysis of Developments, Challenges, and Comparison of Different Markets
title_full The Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Analysis of Developments, Challenges, and Comparison of Different Markets
title_fullStr The Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Analysis of Developments, Challenges, and Comparison of Different Markets
title_full_unstemmed The Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Analysis of Developments, Challenges, and Comparison of Different Markets
title_short The Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Analysis of Developments, Challenges, and Comparison of Different Markets
title_sort The Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Ethics: Analysis of Developments, Challenges, and Comparison of Different Markets
topic Machine Learning Ethics
Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Machine Learning Bias
Machine Learning Discrimination
Trustworthy AI
Artificial Intelligence Principles
Artificial Intelligence Guidelines
topic_facet Machine Learning Ethics
Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Machine Learning Bias
Machine Learning Discrimination
Trustworthy AI
Artificial Intelligence Principles
Artificial Intelligence Guidelines
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/134702
visible 1