Publicação

Listening Between the Lines: How a Theoretical Framework Prevents Superficial Analysis in Qualitative Research

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:Abstract: As quantitative methods dominate the field of clinical psychology, qualitative inquiry struggles to live up to its full potential. The ubiquitous quantitative criteria and epistemology lead to a flawed idea of objectivity, pursued by many qualitative researchers in an attempt to be taken seriously. Therefore, they try to avoid any possible theoretical influence. This often creates a fear for really interpreting data. However, it seems that instead of leading to higher quality research, this rather leads to superficial analyses. In this chapter, I show, based on my own recent research regarding the experience of negative symptoms in psychosis, how theory- use led to more in-depth analyses. Our study consisted of an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of interviews with twelve patients with psychosis about their negative symptoms. During the earlier phases of research, we stayed close to the data and tried to bracket our theoretical assumptions as much as possible. However, when coming to our final analysis, we approached the data more through a theoretical lens. This way we were able to lift our analysis from what was rather a summary of what our participants told to a deeper understanding of the process of negative symptoms.
Autores principais:Moernaut,Nienke
Assunto:theory use interpretative phenomenological analysis negative symptoms psychosis.
Ano:2021
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
Idioma:inglês
Origem:SciELO Portugal
_version_ 1868441973664251904
author Moernaut,Nienke
author_facet Moernaut,Nienke
author_role author
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Moernaut,Nienke\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Moernaut,Nienke
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv theory use
interpretative phenomenological analysis
negative symptoms
psychosis.
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Listening Between the Lines: How a Theoretical Framework Prevents Superficial Analysis in Qualitative Research
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Moernaut,Nienke
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2184-77702021000100015
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ludomedia
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv New Trends in Qualitative Research v.6 2021
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv theory use
interpretative phenomenological analysis
negative symptoms
psychosis.
dc.title.fl_str_mv Listening Between the Lines: How a Theoretical Framework Prevents Superficial Analysis in Qualitative Research
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description Abstract: As quantitative methods dominate the field of clinical psychology, qualitative inquiry struggles to live up to its full potential. The ubiquitous quantitative criteria and epistemology lead to a flawed idea of objectivity, pursued by many qualitative researchers in an attempt to be taken seriously. Therefore, they try to avoid any possible theoretical influence. This often creates a fear for really interpreting data. However, it seems that instead of leading to higher quality research, this rather leads to superficial analyses. In this chapter, I show, based on my own recent research regarding the experience of negative symptoms in psychosis, how theory- use led to more in-depth analyses. Our study consisted of an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of interviews with twelve patients with psychosis about their negative symptoms. During the earlier phases of research, we stayed close to the data and tried to bracket our theoretical assumptions as much as possible. However, when coming to our final analysis, we approached the data more through a theoretical lens. This way we were able to lift our analysis from what was rather a summary of what our participants told to a deeper understanding of the process of negative symptoms.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id scielopt_331fda1cd43e326ac860076103a2b67e
identifier.url.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2184-77702021000100015
instacron_str SciELO
institution Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
instname_str Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
language eng
network_acronym_str scielopt
network_name_str SciELO Portugal
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2184-77702021000100015
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:scielo
person_str_mv Moernaut,Nienke
publishDate 2021
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ludomedia
reponame_str SciELO Portugal
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:scielopt
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:scielopt
spelling Listening Between the Lines: How a Theoretical Framework Prevents Superficial Analysis in Qualitative ResearchMoernaut,Nienketheory useinterpretative phenomenological analysisnegative symptomspsychosis.open accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2184-77702021000100015URLhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2184-77702021000100015URLHasVersion2021-03-01Abstract: As quantitative methods dominate the field of clinical psychology, qualitative inquiry struggles to live up to its full potential. The ubiquitous quantitative criteria and epistemology lead to a flawed idea of objectivity, pursued by many qualitative researchers in an attempt to be taken seriously. Therefore, they try to avoid any possible theoretical influence. This often creates a fear for really interpreting data. However, it seems that instead of leading to higher quality research, this rather leads to superficial analyses. In this chapter, I show, based on my own recent research regarding the experience of negative symptoms in psychosis, how theory- use led to more in-depth analyses. Our study consisted of an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of interviews with twelve patients with psychosis about their negative symptoms. During the earlier phases of research, we stayed close to the data and tried to bracket our theoretical assumptions as much as possible. However, when coming to our final analysis, we approached the data more through a theoretical lens. This way we were able to lift our analysis from what was rather a summary of what our participants told to a deeper understanding of the process of negative symptoms.LudomediaNew Trends in Qualitative Research v.6 2021text/htmlengjournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501literature
spellingShingle Listening Between the Lines: How a Theoretical Framework Prevents Superficial Analysis in Qualitative Research
Moernaut,Nienke
theory use
interpretative phenomenological analysis
negative symptoms
psychosis.
status SINGLETON
subject.fl_str_mv theory use
interpretative phenomenological analysis
negative symptoms
psychosis.
title Listening Between the Lines: How a Theoretical Framework Prevents Superficial Analysis in Qualitative Research
title_full Listening Between the Lines: How a Theoretical Framework Prevents Superficial Analysis in Qualitative Research
title_fullStr Listening Between the Lines: How a Theoretical Framework Prevents Superficial Analysis in Qualitative Research
title_full_unstemmed Listening Between the Lines: How a Theoretical Framework Prevents Superficial Analysis in Qualitative Research
title_short Listening Between the Lines: How a Theoretical Framework Prevents Superficial Analysis in Qualitative Research
title_sort Listening Between the Lines: How a Theoretical Framework Prevents Superficial Analysis in Qualitative Research
topic theory use
interpretative phenomenological analysis
negative symptoms
psychosis.
topic_facet theory use
interpretative phenomenological analysis
negative symptoms
psychosis.
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2184-77702021000100015
visible 1