Publicação

Equal Access to Make Emergency Calls: A Case for Equal Rights for Deaf Citizens in Norway and Sweden

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:It is stipulated that deaf citizens have equal right to use social services as other citizens. One social service is the access to make an emergency call. Deaf citizens who cannot hear and use a signed language to communicate have to make emergency calls in another way rather than relying on listening and speaking via a telephone. However, the possible ways to call are not the same for deaf citizens in all countries. This commentary shows that there are options dedicated for deaf citizens to make emergency alarms in both Norway and Sweden: via telephone typewriters, Short Message Service, and Video Relay Service, although the design of the respective options differs between the countries. However, it is argued that deaf citizens in Norway do not have equal access to make emergency alarms as other citizens in Norway, whereas the situation for deaf citizens in Sweden may be seen as equal compared to other citizens in Sweden, although there still are limitations.
Autores principais:Warnicke, Camilla
Assunto:alarm call; deaf; equal rights; interpreter; Short Message Service; signed language; SOS phone; telephone typewriters; Video Relay Service
Ano:2019
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:unknown
Instituição associada:Cogitatio Press
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Social Inclusion
_version_ 1869050840311922688
author Warnicke, Camilla
author_facet Warnicke, Camilla
author_role author
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Warnicke, Camilla\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Warnicke, Camilla
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv alarm call; deaf; equal rights; interpreter; Short Message Service; signed language; SOS phone; telephone typewriters; Video Relay Service
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Equal Access to Make Emergency Calls: A Case for Equal Rights for Deaf Citizens in Norway and Sweden
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Warnicke, Camilla
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1594
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 7, No 1 (2019): People with Disabilities: The Overlooked Consumers; 173-179
2183-2803
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv alarm call; deaf; equal rights; interpreter; Short Message Service; signed language; SOS phone; telephone typewriters; Video Relay Service
dc.title.fl_str_mv Equal Access to Make Emergency Calls: A Case for Equal Rights for Deaf Citizens in Norway and Sweden
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description It is stipulated that deaf citizens have equal right to use social services as other citizens. One social service is the access to make an emergency call. Deaf citizens who cannot hear and use a signed language to communicate have to make emergency calls in another way rather than relying on listening and speaking via a telephone. However, the possible ways to call are not the same for deaf citizens in all countries. This commentary shows that there are options dedicated for deaf citizens to make emergency alarms in both Norway and Sweden: via telephone typewriters, Short Message Service, and Video Relay Service, although the design of the respective options differs between the countries. However, it is argued that deaf citizens in Norway do not have equal access to make emergency alarms as other citizens in Norway, whereas the situation for deaf citizens in Sweden may be seen as equal compared to other citizens in Sweden, although there still are limitations.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv unknown
format article
id si_b30c4041dc18331ce2c4792effec6e4f
identifier.doi.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1594
inst_facet_str urn:organizationAcronym:cp{{{_:::_}}}Cogitatio Press
instacron_str cp
institution Cogitatio Press
instname_str Cogitatio Press
language eng
network_acronym_str si
network_name_str Social Inclusion
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1594
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:cp
person_str_mv Warnicke, Camilla
publishDate 2019
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
repo_facet_str urn:repositoryAcronym:si{{{_:::_}}}Social Inclusion
reponame_str Social Inclusion
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:si
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:si
spelling en-USEqual Access to Make Emergency Calls: A Case for Equal Rights for Deaf Citizens in Norway and SwedenWarnicke, Camillaalarm call; deaf; equal rights; interpreter; Short Message Service; signed language; SOS phone; telephone typewriters; Video Relay ServiceCopyright (c) 2019 Camilla Warnickehttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1594DOIoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1594OAIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1594URLhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1594DOIhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1594/1594URLHasVersion2019-01-31en-USIt is stipulated that deaf citizens have equal right to use social services as other citizens. One social service is the access to make an emergency call. Deaf citizens who cannot hear and use a signed language to communicate have to make emergency calls in another way rather than relying on listening and speaking via a telephone. However, the possible ways to call are not the same for deaf citizens in all countries. This commentary shows that there are options dedicated for deaf citizens to make emergency alarms in both Norway and Sweden: via telephone typewriters, Short Message Service, and Video Relay Service, although the design of the respective options differs between the countries. However, it is argued that deaf citizens in Norway do not have equal access to make emergency alarms as other citizens in Norway, whereas the situation for deaf citizens in Sweden may be seen as equal compared to other citizens in Sweden, although there still are limitations.Cogitatioapplication/pdfen-USSocial Inclusion; Vol 7, No 1 (2019): People with Disabilities: The Overlooked Consumers; 173-1792183-2803engjournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501literatureVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
spellingShingle Equal Access to Make Emergency Calls: A Case for Equal Rights for Deaf Citizens in Norway and Sweden
Warnicke, Camilla
alarm call; deaf; equal rights; interpreter; Short Message Service; signed language; SOS phone; telephone typewriters; Video Relay Service
status SINGLETON
status_str VoR
subject.fl_str_mv alarm call; deaf; equal rights; interpreter; Short Message Service; signed language; SOS phone; telephone typewriters; Video Relay Service
title Equal Access to Make Emergency Calls: A Case for Equal Rights for Deaf Citizens in Norway and Sweden
title_full Equal Access to Make Emergency Calls: A Case for Equal Rights for Deaf Citizens in Norway and Sweden
title_fullStr Equal Access to Make Emergency Calls: A Case for Equal Rights for Deaf Citizens in Norway and Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Equal Access to Make Emergency Calls: A Case for Equal Rights for Deaf Citizens in Norway and Sweden
title_short Equal Access to Make Emergency Calls: A Case for Equal Rights for Deaf Citizens in Norway and Sweden
title_sort Equal Access to Make Emergency Calls: A Case for Equal Rights for Deaf Citizens in Norway and Sweden
topic alarm call; deaf; equal rights; interpreter; Short Message Service; signed language; SOS phone; telephone typewriters; Video Relay Service
topic_facet alarm call; deaf; equal rights; interpreter; Short Message Service; signed language; SOS phone; telephone typewriters; Video Relay Service
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1594
visible 1