Publicação

Epidemiological surveillance: a team challenge

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:The National Epidemiological Surveillance System monitors the incidence of communicable diseases, adding to their prevention and control and evaluating the effectiveness of prevention efforts. In view of recent legislative reviews, Public Health Units should play an important role in the operation of such a system. In this context, it was considered opportune in collaboration with a hospital, to develop a consultancy in order to understand reporting embarrassment factors and develop a systematic multidisciplinary review. In 2015, we retrospectively audited 26 diseases listed for mandatory notification between 2010 and 2014. We determined the notification rates of the cases identified, matching residents in Municipality B. The information sources consulted were homogeneous diagnosis groups, laboratory records, medical notifications, and 717 clinical records referring to cases of disease with positive or dubious laboratory results. We applied a questionnaire to 26 doctors to quantify and understand the under-reporting. We identified 289 cases relating to 14 of the 26 diseases audited. In Municipality B there was an overall notification rate of 34,6% (45/130). The identified cases of brucellosis, Lyme disease, Q fever, and malaria were not reported. The main reason for under notification is "bureaucracy" (53,8%). Some doctors (15,8%) only reported at the time of the patient’s discharge from hospital. Some limitations stand out for their impact, such as those relating to complementary diagnostic tests and epidemiological veterinary monitoring. A multidisciplinary and complementary interactive approach of public health services is essential. This must be integrated with other health institutions and with veterinary services, in order to ensure better monitoring, thereby helping to improve people’s health and wellbeing.
Autores principais:Eufrásio, Ricardo
Outros Autores:Lopes, Fernando
Assunto:Epidemiological monitoring public health hospital epidemiology. Vigilncia epidemiológica saúde pública epidemiologia hospitalar
Ano:2023
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:unknown
Instituição associada:Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra
Idioma:português
Origem:Territorium
_version_ 1867781741541851136
author Eufrásio, Ricardo
author2 Lopes, Fernando
author2_role author
author_facet Eufrásio, Ricardo
Lopes, Fernando
author_role author
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Eufrásio, Ricardo\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Lopes, Fernando\"}]
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Eufrásio, Ricardo
Lopes, Fernando
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv Epidemiological monitoring
public health
hospital epidemiology.
Vigilncia epidemiológica
saúde pública
epidemiologia hospitalar
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Epidemiological surveillance: a team challenge
Vigilncia epidemiológica: um desafio multidisciplinar
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Eufrásio, Ricardo
Lopes, Fernando
dc.description.none.fl_str_mv OO Sistema Nacional de Vigilncia Epidemiológica monitoriza a ocorrência de doenças transmissíveis, contribuindo para a respetiva prevenção e controlo. Face à s recentes alterações legislativas, as Unidades de Saúde Pública podem contribuir na operacionalização local do referido sistema. Neste contexto, considerou-se oportuno em colaboração com um hospital, realizar uma consultoria, visando esclarecer a subnotificação, identificar fatores de constrangimento, e desenvolver uma revisão sistemática multidisciplinar. Em 2015, realizou-se uma auditoria externa retrospetiva (2010-2014) relativa à notificação de 26 doenças listadas para o efeito. Determinaram-se as taxas de notificação dos casos identificados, correspondentes a residentes no Concelho B. Consultou-se informação referente aos grupos de diagnóstico homogéneo, registos laboratoriais, notificações, bem como a 717 registos clínicos referentes a casos de doença com resultados laboratoriais positivos ou duvidosos. Aplicou-se um inquérito por questionário a 26 médicos, para quantificar e compreender a subnotificação. Identificaram-se 289 casos referentes a 14 das 26 doenças auditadas. Observou-se no Concelho B uma taxa global de notificação de 34,6% (45/130). Os casos identificados de brucelose, doença de Lyme, febre Q, hepatite B e malária, não foram notificados. Entre os principais motivos para a subnotificação destaca-se a "burocracia" (53,8%). Alguns profissionais (15,8%) notificam apenas no momento da alta hospitalar. Pelo seu impacto, destacaram-se limitações relativas à s opções de exames complementares de diagnóstico e à vigilncia epidemiológica veterinária. É fundamental uma articulação multidisciplinar e complementar dos serviços de saúde pública com as demais instituições de saúde, visando contribuir para a saúde e bem-estar das populações.
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-7723_30-1_7
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv por
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Territorium; No. 30(I) (2023): Health risks in the context of a pandemic: reflections on the impact of COVID-19; 85-97
Territorium; N.º 30(I) (2023): Riscos para a saúde em contexto pandémico: reflexões sobre o impacte da COVID-19; 85-97
1647-7723
0872-8941
10.14195/1647-7723_30-1
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Epidemiological monitoring
public health
hospital epidemiology.
Vigilncia epidemiológica
saúde pública
epidemiologia hospitalar
dc.title.fl_str_mv Epidemiological surveillance: a team challenge
Vigilncia epidemiológica: um desafio multidisciplinar
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
description The National Epidemiological Surveillance System monitors the incidence of communicable diseases, adding to their prevention and control and evaluating the effectiveness of prevention efforts. In view of recent legislative reviews, Public Health Units should play an important role in the operation of such a system. In this context, it was considered opportune in collaboration with a hospital, to develop a consultancy in order to understand reporting embarrassment factors and develop a systematic multidisciplinary review. In 2015, we retrospectively audited 26 diseases listed for mandatory notification between 2010 and 2014. We determined the notification rates of the cases identified, matching residents in Municipality B. The information sources consulted were homogeneous diagnosis groups, laboratory records, medical notifications, and 717 clinical records referring to cases of disease with positive or dubious laboratory results. We applied a questionnaire to 26 doctors to quantify and understand the under-reporting. We identified 289 cases relating to 14 of the 26 diseases audited. In Municipality B there was an overall notification rate of 34,6% (45/130). The identified cases of brucellosis, Lyme disease, Q fever, and malaria were not reported. The main reason for under notification is "bureaucracy" (53,8%). Some doctors (15,8%) only reported at the time of the patient’s discharge from hospital. Some limitations stand out for their impact, such as those relating to complementary diagnostic tests and epidemiological veterinary monitoring. A multidisciplinary and complementary interactive approach of public health services is essential. This must be integrated with other health institutions and with veterinary services, in order to ensure better monitoring, thereby helping to improve people’s health and wellbeing.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv unknown
format article
id terrium_3f0d28fcb95ded8816b22f369cc030d4
identifier.doi.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-7723_30-1_7
instacron_str IUC
institution Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra
instname_str Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra
language por
network_acronym_str terrium
network_name_str Territorium
oai_identifier_str oai:impactum-journals.uc.pt:article/12019
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:iuc
person_str_mv Eufrásio, Ricardo
Lopes, Fernando
publishDate 2023
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra
reponame_str Territorium
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:terrium
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:terrium
spelling en-USEpidemiological surveillance: a team challengept-PTVigilncia epidemiológica: um desafio multidisciplinarEufrásio, RicardoLopes, FernandoEpidemiological monitoringpublic healthhospital epidemiology.Vigilncia epidemiológicasaúde públicaepidemiologia hospitalarDireitos de Autor (c) 2023 Territoriumhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-7723_30-1_7DOIhttps://impactum-journals.uc.pt/territorium/article/view/12019URLHasVersionhttps://impactum-journals.uc.pt/territorium/article/view/12019/9352URLHasVersionhttps://doi.org/10.14195/1647-7723_30-1_7DOI2023-06-29en-USThe National Epidemiological Surveillance System monitors the incidence of communicable diseases, adding to their prevention and control and evaluating the effectiveness of prevention efforts. In view of recent legislative reviews, Public Health Units should play an important role in the operation of such a system. In this context, it was considered opportune in collaboration with a hospital, to develop a consultancy in order to understand reporting embarrassment factors and develop a systematic multidisciplinary review. In 2015, we retrospectively audited 26 diseases listed for mandatory notification between 2010 and 2014. We determined the notification rates of the cases identified, matching residents in Municipality B. The information sources consulted were homogeneous diagnosis groups, laboratory records, medical notifications, and 717 clinical records referring to cases of disease with positive or dubious laboratory results. We applied a questionnaire to 26 doctors to quantify and understand the under-reporting. We identified 289 cases relating to 14 of the 26 diseases audited. In Municipality B there was an overall notification rate of 34,6% (45/130). The identified cases of brucellosis, Lyme disease, Q fever, and malaria were not reported. The main reason for under notification is "bureaucracy" (53,8%). Some doctors (15,8%) only reported at the time of the patient’s discharge from hospital. Some limitations stand out for their impact, such as those relating to complementary diagnostic tests and epidemiological veterinary monitoring. A multidisciplinary and complementary interactive approach of public health services is essential. This must be integrated with other health institutions and with veterinary services, in order to ensure better monitoring, thereby helping to improve people’s health and wellbeing.pt-PTOO Sistema Nacional de Vigilncia Epidemiológica monitoriza a ocorrência de doenças transmissíveis, contribuindo para a respetiva prevenção e controlo. Face à s recentes alterações legislativas, as Unidades de Saúde Pública podem contribuir na operacionalização local do referido sistema. Neste contexto, considerou-se oportuno em colaboração com um hospital, realizar uma consultoria, visando esclarecer a subnotificação, identificar fatores de constrangimento, e desenvolver uma revisão sistemática multidisciplinar. Em 2015, realizou-se uma auditoria externa retrospetiva (2010-2014) relativa à notificação de 26 doenças listadas para o efeito. Determinaram-se as taxas de notificação dos casos identificados, correspondentes a residentes no Concelho B. Consultou-se informação referente aos grupos de diagnóstico homogéneo, registos laboratoriais, notificações, bem como a 717 registos clínicos referentes a casos de doença com resultados laboratoriais positivos ou duvidosos. Aplicou-se um inquérito por questionário a 26 médicos, para quantificar e compreender a subnotificação. Identificaram-se 289 casos referentes a 14 das 26 doenças auditadas. Observou-se no Concelho B uma taxa global de notificação de 34,6% (45/130). Os casos identificados de brucelose, doença de Lyme, febre Q, hepatite B e malária, não foram notificados. Entre os principais motivos para a subnotificação destaca-se a "burocracia" (53,8%). Alguns profissionais (15,8%) notificam apenas no momento da alta hospitalar. Pelo seu impacto, destacaram-se limitações relativas à s opções de exames complementares de diagnóstico e à vigilncia epidemiológica veterinária. É fundamental uma articulação multidisciplinar e complementar dos serviços de saúde pública com as demais instituições de saúde, visando contribuir para a saúde e bem-estar das populações.Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbraapplication/pdfen-USTerritorium; No. 30(I) (2023): Health risks in the context of a pandemic: reflections on the impact of COVID-19; 85-97pt-PTTerritorium; N.º 30(I) (2023): Riscos para a saúde em contexto pandémico: reflexões sobre o impacte da COVID-19; 85-971647-77230872-894110.14195/1647-7723_30-1porjournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501literatureVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
spellingShingle Epidemiological surveillance: a team challenge
Eufrásio, Ricardo
Epidemiological monitoring
public health
hospital epidemiology.
Vigilncia epidemiológica
saúde pública
epidemiologia hospitalar
status SINGLETON
status_str VoR
subject.fl_str_mv Epidemiological monitoring
public health
hospital epidemiology.
Vigilncia epidemiológica
saúde pública
epidemiologia hospitalar
title Epidemiological surveillance: a team challenge
title_full Epidemiological surveillance: a team challenge
title_fullStr Epidemiological surveillance: a team challenge
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological surveillance: a team challenge
title_short Epidemiological surveillance: a team challenge
title_sort Epidemiological surveillance: a team challenge
topic Epidemiological monitoring
public health
hospital epidemiology.
Vigilncia epidemiológica
saúde pública
epidemiologia hospitalar
topic_facet Epidemiological monitoring
public health
hospital epidemiology.
Vigilncia epidemiológica
saúde pública
epidemiologia hospitalar
url https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-7723_30-1_7
visible 1