Publicação

Is there a gender gap in feedback preciseness among top leaders? An experimental approach

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:This study investigates whether feedback precision varies by gender in leadership roles. The research employs an experimental design that facilitates real-time feedback exchanges between two groups: directors (feedback providers) and managers (feedback recipients). The experimental task, based on Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) developed by Peus et al. (2013) and grounded in the Full Range Leadership Model (FRLM), comprises three parts. In Part 1, managers complete a leadership task evaluated by directors in Part 2, who provide both quantitative and qualitative feedback. In Part 3, managers retake the task after receiving feedback. Directors are incentivized through two treatments: Treatment I ties their pay to managers' performance in the retake task, while Treatment II allows directors to choose between a fixed payment or performance-based compensation after being informed of their assigned manager's gender. Feedback preciseness is assessed through structured qualitative responses, where directors can choose between vague or precise feedback messages (after knowing the manager’s gender). The feedback is further categorized as either praising or critically motivating. Quantitative feedback includes directors' evaluations of managers' leadership effectiveness and leadership potential. Managers and directors also complete beliefs and confidence questionnaires, evaluating their expectations. Findings reveal no evidence of gender-based differences in feedback precision or its influence on (current and future) performance expectations and actual future performance. Moreover, the analyses reveal no significant association between feedback type and treatment or between manager gender and director reward choices.
Autores principais:Pereira, Regina Maria Marques da Fonseca
Assunto:Gender bias Feedback preciseness Leadership positions STJs Experimental design
Ano:2024
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:dissertação de mestrado
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Universidade de Lisboa
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
_version_ 1866809230506328064
author Pereira, Regina Maria Marques da Fonseca
author_facet Pereira, Regina Maria Marques da Fonseca
author_role author
contributor_name_str_mv Maximiano, Sandra
Pais, Joana Vaz
Coutts, Alexander
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto da ULisboa
country_str PT
creators_json_txt [{\"Person.name\":\"Pereira, Regina Maria Marques da Fonseca\"}]
datacite.contributors.contributor.contributorName.fl_str_mv Maximiano, Sandra
Pais, Joana Vaz
Coutts, Alexander
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto da ULisboa
datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv Pereira, Regina Maria Marques da Fonseca
datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
datacite.date.available.fl_str_mv 2025-09-06T00:30:41Z
datacite.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2025-09-06T00:30:41Z
datacite.rights.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv Gender bias
Feedback preciseness
Leadership positions
STJs
Experimental design
datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv Is there a gender gap in feedback preciseness among top leaders? An experimental approach
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Maximiano, Sandra
Pais, Joana Vaz
Coutts, Alexander
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto da ULisboa
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pereira, Regina Maria Marques da Fonseca
dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2025-09-06T00:30:41Z
dc.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv 2025-09-06T00:30:41Z
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/99076
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Gender bias
Feedback preciseness
Leadership positions
STJs
Experimental design
dc.title.fl_str_mv Is there a gender gap in feedback preciseness among top leaders? An experimental approach
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdcc
description This study investigates whether feedback precision varies by gender in leadership roles. The research employs an experimental design that facilitates real-time feedback exchanges between two groups: directors (feedback providers) and managers (feedback recipients). The experimental task, based on Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) developed by Peus et al. (2013) and grounded in the Full Range Leadership Model (FRLM), comprises three parts. In Part 1, managers complete a leadership task evaluated by directors in Part 2, who provide both quantitative and qualitative feedback. In Part 3, managers retake the task after receiving feedback. Directors are incentivized through two treatments: Treatment I ties their pay to managers' performance in the retake task, while Treatment II allows directors to choose between a fixed payment or performance-based compensation after being informed of their assigned manager's gender. Feedback preciseness is assessed through structured qualitative responses, where directors can choose between vague or precise feedback messages (after knowing the manager’s gender). The feedback is further categorized as either praising or critically motivating. Quantitative feedback includes directors' evaluations of managers' leadership effectiveness and leadership potential. Managers and directors also complete beliefs and confidence questionnaires, evaluating their expectations. Findings reveal no evidence of gender-based differences in feedback precision or its influence on (current and future) performance expectations and actual future performance. Moreover, the analyses reveal no significant association between feedback type and treatment or between manager gender and director reward choices.
dirty 0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format masterThesis
fulltext.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/bitstreams/988d8d3b-1919-4e8c-89a4-492cdd7a427e/download
id ul_1bd7a2e48b9447b4f28b939fd641be21
identifier.url.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/99076
instacron_str ul
institution Universidade de Lisboa
instname_str Universidade de Lisboa
language eng
network_acronym_str ul
network_name_str Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ulisboa.pt:10400.5/99076
organization_str_mv urn:organizationAcronym:ul
person_str_mv Pereira, Regina Maria Marques da Fonseca
publishDate 2024
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão
reponame_str Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
repository_id_str urn:repositoryAcronym:ul
service_str_mv urn:repositoryAcronym:ul
spelling engInstituto Superior de Economia e Gestãopt_PTThis study investigates whether feedback precision varies by gender in leadership roles. The research employs an experimental design that facilitates real-time feedback exchanges between two groups: directors (feedback providers) and managers (feedback recipients). The experimental task, based on Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) developed by Peus et al. (2013) and grounded in the Full Range Leadership Model (FRLM), comprises three parts. In Part 1, managers complete a leadership task evaluated by directors in Part 2, who provide both quantitative and qualitative feedback. In Part 3, managers retake the task after receiving feedback. Directors are incentivized through two treatments: Treatment I ties their pay to managers' performance in the retake task, while Treatment II allows directors to choose between a fixed payment or performance-based compensation after being informed of their assigned manager's gender. Feedback preciseness is assessed through structured qualitative responses, where directors can choose between vague or precise feedback messages (after knowing the manager’s gender). The feedback is further categorized as either praising or critically motivating. Quantitative feedback includes directors' evaluations of managers' leadership effectiveness and leadership potential. Managers and directors also complete beliefs and confidence questionnaires, evaluating their expectations. Findings reveal no evidence of gender-based differences in feedback precision or its influence on (current and future) performance expectations and actual future performance. Moreover, the analyses reveal no significant association between feedback type and treatment or between manager gender and director reward choices.application/pdfpt_PTIs there a gender gap in feedback preciseness among top leaders? An experimental approachPereira, Regina Maria Marques da FonsecaMaximiano, SandraPais, Joana VazCoutts, AlexanderHostingInstitutionOrganizationalRepositório Científico de Acesso Aberto da ULisboae-mailmailto:repositorio@reitoria.ulisboa.ptrepositorio@reitoria.ulisboa.pt2025-09-06T00:30:41Z2024-102024-10-01T00:00:00ZHandlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/99076http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2open accessGender biasFeedback precisenessLeadership positionsSTJsExperimental design3036327 bytesliteraturehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_bdccmaster thesishttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2application/pdffulltexthttps://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/bitstreams/988d8d3b-1919-4e8c-89a4-492cdd7a427e/download
spellingShingle Is there a gender gap in feedback preciseness among top leaders? An experimental approach
Pereira, Regina Maria Marques da Fonseca
Gender bias
Feedback preciseness
Leadership positions
STJs
Experimental design
status SINGLETON
subject.fl_str_mv Gender bias
Feedback preciseness
Leadership positions
STJs
Experimental design
title Is there a gender gap in feedback preciseness among top leaders? An experimental approach
title_full Is there a gender gap in feedback preciseness among top leaders? An experimental approach
title_fullStr Is there a gender gap in feedback preciseness among top leaders? An experimental approach
title_full_unstemmed Is there a gender gap in feedback preciseness among top leaders? An experimental approach
title_short Is there a gender gap in feedback preciseness among top leaders? An experimental approach
title_sort Is there a gender gap in feedback preciseness among top leaders? An experimental approach
topic Gender bias
Feedback preciseness
Leadership positions
STJs
Experimental design
topic_facet Gender bias
Feedback preciseness
Leadership positions
STJs
Experimental design
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/99076
visible 1