Publicação
Assessment level and time scales of biodiversity indicators in the scope of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – A case study for the NE Atlantic
| Resumo: | European Union Member States have made an unprecedent effort to implement the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). However, the coherent assessment of Europe’s marine waters and Good Environmental Status by 2020 has not yet been achieved. This work analysed the implementation level and time scales used to report biodiversity criteria in the 1st MSFD cycle for two Biogeographic Regions: the Celtic Seas and the Bay of Biscay and Iberian Platform. Results were compared across Biogeographic Regions, Marine Sub-units, Criteria, and Biological Groups to assess congruency and integration possibilities. Reporting level was significantly different among Marine Sub-units within the same Biogeographic Region and country. France and Spain showed the highest implementation level and focused on criteria included in Biodiversity (1) and Food-Webs (4) Descriptors, while Ireland mostly reported Commercial Fish and Shellfish (3). Fish, Rocky and Biogenic Reefs and Sedimentary Habitat were the most reported Groups. Heterogeneous data was recorded for temporal scales used to report Groups and Criteria among Marine Sub-units within the same region, showing that each MS is working individually. Average temporal range used for reporting was wider in French Bay of Biscay, particularly for Marine turtles’ Group, Food-web Criteria (Descriptor 4), and Ecosystem structure criteria (1.7). Ireland presented consistently shorter temporal data sets focusing on Commercial Fish and Shellfish descriptor (3) and Fish Group. To enable the direct comparisons and integration of MSFD results, the use of historical and opportunistic data should be discouraged, the reporting timeframe of existing monitoring datasets (beginning/end) should be synchronized at regional level, and targeted habitats/species should be decided and prioritized regionally. This work pinpoints MSFD gaps and provides inputs for an improved 2nd implementation cycle, particularly in what concerns temporal scales used for reporting. |
|---|---|
| Autores principais: | Sousa Machado, Maria Inês |
| Outros Autores: | Costa, José Lino; Leal, Miguel; Pasquaud, Stéphanie; Cabral, Henrique |
| Assunto: | MSFD Reporting level Temporal scale Biogeographic Region Monitoring Regional cooperation |
| Ano: | 2019 |
| País: | Portugal |
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Tipo de acesso: | acesso restrito |
| Instituição associada: | Universidade de Lisboa |
| Idioma: | inglês |
| Origem: | Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
| _version_ | 1869345939778437120 |
|---|---|
| author | Sousa Machado, Maria Inês |
| author2 | Costa, José Lino Leal, Miguel Pasquaud, Stéphanie Cabral, Henrique |
| author2_role | author author author author |
| author_facet | Sousa Machado, Maria Inês Costa, José Lino Leal, Miguel Pasquaud, Stéphanie Cabral, Henrique |
| author_role | author |
| contributor_name_str_mv | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto da ULisboa |
| country_str | PT |
| creators_json_txt | [{\"Person.name\":\"Sousa Machado, Maria Inês\",\"Person.identifier.orcid\":\"0000-0001-8687-1680\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Costa, José Lino\",\"Person.identifier.orcid\":\"0000-0002-3843-4635\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Leal, Miguel\",\"Person.identifier.orcid\":\"0000-0003-0672-6251\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Pasquaud, Stéphanie\",\"Person.identifier.orcid\":\"0000-0002-2416-5841\"},{\"Person.name\":\"Cabral, Henrique\",\"Person.identifier.orcid\":\"0000-0002-7646-6208\"}] |
| datacite.contributors.contributor.contributorName.fl_str_mv | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto da ULisboa |
| datacite.creators.creator.creatorName.fl_str_mv | Sousa Machado, Maria Inês Costa, José Lino Leal, Miguel Pasquaud, Stéphanie Cabral, Henrique |
| datacite.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv | 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| datacite.date.available.fl_str_mv | 2020-01-19T14:49:50Z |
| datacite.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv | 2020-01-19T14:49:50Z |
| datacite.rights.fl_str_mv | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |
| datacite.subjects.subject.fl_str_mv | MSFD Reporting level Temporal scale Biogeographic Region Monitoring Regional cooperation |
| datacite.titles.title.fl_str_mv | Assessment level and time scales of biodiversity indicators in the scope of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – A case study for the NE Atlantic |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto da ULisboa |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Sousa Machado, Maria Inês Costa, José Lino Leal, Miguel Pasquaud, Stéphanie Cabral, Henrique |
| dc.date.Accepted.fl_str_mv | 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| dc.date.available.fl_str_mv | 2020-01-19T14:49:50Z |
| dc.date.embargoed.fl_str_mv | 2020-01-19T14:49:50Z |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/41051 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | eng |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Elsevier |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | MSFD Reporting level Temporal scale Biogeographic Region Monitoring Regional cooperation |
| dc.title.fl_str_mv | Assessment level and time scales of biodiversity indicators in the scope of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – A case study for the NE Atlantic |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| description | European Union Member States have made an unprecedent effort to implement the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). However, the coherent assessment of Europe’s marine waters and Good Environmental Status by 2020 has not yet been achieved. This work analysed the implementation level and time scales used to report biodiversity criteria in the 1st MSFD cycle for two Biogeographic Regions: the Celtic Seas and the Bay of Biscay and Iberian Platform. Results were compared across Biogeographic Regions, Marine Sub-units, Criteria, and Biological Groups to assess congruency and integration possibilities. Reporting level was significantly different among Marine Sub-units within the same Biogeographic Region and country. France and Spain showed the highest implementation level and focused on criteria included in Biodiversity (1) and Food-Webs (4) Descriptors, while Ireland mostly reported Commercial Fish and Shellfish (3). Fish, Rocky and Biogenic Reefs and Sedimentary Habitat were the most reported Groups. Heterogeneous data was recorded for temporal scales used to report Groups and Criteria among Marine Sub-units within the same region, showing that each MS is working individually. Average temporal range used for reporting was wider in French Bay of Biscay, particularly for Marine turtles’ Group, Food-web Criteria (Descriptor 4), and Ecosystem structure criteria (1.7). Ireland presented consistently shorter temporal data sets focusing on Commercial Fish and Shellfish descriptor (3) and Fish Group. To enable the direct comparisons and integration of MSFD results, the use of historical and opportunistic data should be discouraged, the reporting timeframe of existing monitoring datasets (beginning/end) should be synchronized at regional level, and targeted habitats/species should be decided and prioritized regionally. This work pinpoints MSFD gaps and provides inputs for an improved 2nd implementation cycle, particularly in what concerns temporal scales used for reporting. |
| dirty | 0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv | restrictedAccess |
| format | article |
| fulltext.url.fl_str_mv | https://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/bitstreams/ce11762b-bf19-4480-99ca-08997e3f1e84/download |
| id | ul_44c91c13dc28b6a6bdacec2bbde309ef |
| identifier.url.fl_str_mv | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/41051 |
| inst_facet_str | urn:organizationAcronym:ul{{{_:::_}}}Universidade de Lisboa |
| instacron_str | ul |
| institution | Universidade de Lisboa |
| instname_str | Universidade de Lisboa |
| language | eng |
| network_acronym_str | ul |
| network_name_str | Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:repositorio.ulisboa.pt:10451/41051 |
| organization_str_mv | urn:organizationAcronym:ul |
| person_str_mv | Sousa Machado, Maria Inês Sousa Machado, Maria Inês https://www.ciencia-id.pt/8919-00F3-662A 8919-00F3-662A http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8687-1680 0000-0001-8687-1680 Costa, José Lino Costa, José Lino https://www.ciencia-id.pt/7519-E986-8350 7519-E986-8350 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-4635 0000-0002-3843-4635 Leal, Miguel Leal, Miguel http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0672-6251 0000-0003-0672-6251 Pasquaud, Stéphanie Pasquaud, Stéphanie http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2416-5841 0000-0002-2416-5841 Cabral, Henrique Cabral, Henrique https://www.ciencia-id.pt/CD19-4B30-2D53 CD19-4B30-2D53 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7646-6208 0000-0002-7646-6208 |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Elsevier |
| repo_facet_str | urn:repositoryAcronym:ul{{{_:::_}}}Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
| reponame_str | Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
| repository_id_str | urn:repositoryAcronym:ul |
| service_str_mv | urn:repositoryAcronym:ul |
| spelling | engElsevierpt_PTEuropean Union Member States have made an unprecedent effort to implement the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). However, the coherent assessment of Europe’s marine waters and Good Environmental Status by 2020 has not yet been achieved. This work analysed the implementation level and time scales used to report biodiversity criteria in the 1st MSFD cycle for two Biogeographic Regions: the Celtic Seas and the Bay of Biscay and Iberian Platform. Results were compared across Biogeographic Regions, Marine Sub-units, Criteria, and Biological Groups to assess congruency and integration possibilities. Reporting level was significantly different among Marine Sub-units within the same Biogeographic Region and country. France and Spain showed the highest implementation level and focused on criteria included in Biodiversity (1) and Food-Webs (4) Descriptors, while Ireland mostly reported Commercial Fish and Shellfish (3). Fish, Rocky and Biogenic Reefs and Sedimentary Habitat were the most reported Groups. Heterogeneous data was recorded for temporal scales used to report Groups and Criteria among Marine Sub-units within the same region, showing that each MS is working individually. Average temporal range used for reporting was wider in French Bay of Biscay, particularly for Marine turtles’ Group, Food-web Criteria (Descriptor 4), and Ecosystem structure criteria (1.7). Ireland presented consistently shorter temporal data sets focusing on Commercial Fish and Shellfish descriptor (3) and Fish Group. To enable the direct comparisons and integration of MSFD results, the use of historical and opportunistic data should be discouraged, the reporting timeframe of existing monitoring datasets (beginning/end) should be synchronized at regional level, and targeted habitats/species should be decided and prioritized regionally. This work pinpoints MSFD gaps and provides inputs for an improved 2nd implementation cycle, particularly in what concerns temporal scales used for reporting.application/pdfpt_PTAssessment level and time scales of biodiversity indicators in the scope of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – A case study for the NE AtlanticPersonalSousa Machado, Maria InêsDSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/002af65e-f81d-4feb-a6f2-f83a9d0b6b9bDSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/002af65e-f81d-4feb-a6f2-f83a9d0b6b9bSousa MachadoMaria InêsCiência IDhttps://www.ciencia-id.pt8919-00F3-662AORCIDhttp://orcid.org0000-0001-8687-1680Researcher IDhttps://www.researcherid.comY-6097-2018Scopus Author IDhttps://www.scopus.com56500134300PersonalCosta, José LinoDSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/a70b601c-dcd7-4098-9ee2-73e1f2c722afDSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/a70b601c-dcd7-4098-9ee2-73e1f2c722afCostaJosé LinoCiência IDhttps://www.ciencia-id.pt7519-E986-8350ORCIDhttp://orcid.org0000-0002-3843-4635Scopus Author IDhttps://www.scopus.com7402461424PersonalLeal, MiguelDSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/7c44319f-4d64-46dd-bee6-47d5602c5e63DSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/7c44319f-4d64-46dd-bee6-47d5602c5e63LealMiguelORCIDhttp://orcid.org0000-0003-0672-6251Researcher IDhttps://www.researcherid.comC-8611-2009PersonalPasquaud, StéphanieDSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/77c80102-bffd-48ee-8766-08c8f1246e73DSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/77c80102-bffd-48ee-8766-08c8f1246e73PasquaudStéphanieORCIDhttp://orcid.org0000-0002-2416-5841Researcher IDhttps://www.researcherid.comB-5229-2012Scopus Author IDhttps://www.scopus.com6505620454PersonalCabral, HenriqueDSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/36de15f7-6c1c-4cce-ac65-5719d7ac4faaDSpacehttp://dspace.org/items/36de15f7-6c1c-4cce-ac65-5719d7ac4faaCabralHenriqueCiência IDhttps://www.ciencia-id.ptCD19-4B30-2D53ORCIDhttp://orcid.org0000-0002-7646-6208Researcher IDhttps://www.researcherid.comD-5201-2011Scopus Author IDhttps://www.scopus.com7006073782Scopus Author IDhttps://www.scopus.com56524776700HostingInstitutionOrganizationalRepositório Científico de Acesso Aberto da ULisboae-mailmailto:repositorio@ulisboa.ptrepositorio@ulisboa.ptISSNIsPartOf1470-160XDOIIsPartOf10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.0672020-01-19T14:49:50Z20192019-01-01T00:00:00ZHandlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/41051http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecrestricted accessMSFDReporting levelTemporal scaleBiogeographic RegionMonitoringRegional cooperation338464 bytesliteraturehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecapplication/pdffulltexthttps://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/bitstreams/ce11762b-bf19-4480-99ca-08997e3f1e84/downloadEcological Indicators105242253 |
| spellingShingle | Assessment level and time scales of biodiversity indicators in the scope of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – A case study for the NE Atlantic Sousa Machado, Maria Inês MSFD Reporting level Temporal scale Biogeographic Region Monitoring Regional cooperation |
| status | SINGLETON |
| subject.fl_str_mv | MSFD Reporting level Temporal scale Biogeographic Region Monitoring Regional cooperation |
| title | Assessment level and time scales of biodiversity indicators in the scope of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – A case study for the NE Atlantic |
| title_full | Assessment level and time scales of biodiversity indicators in the scope of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – A case study for the NE Atlantic |
| title_fullStr | Assessment level and time scales of biodiversity indicators in the scope of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – A case study for the NE Atlantic |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessment level and time scales of biodiversity indicators in the scope of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – A case study for the NE Atlantic |
| title_short | Assessment level and time scales of biodiversity indicators in the scope of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – A case study for the NE Atlantic |
| title_sort | Assessment level and time scales of biodiversity indicators in the scope of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive – A case study for the NE Atlantic |
| topic | MSFD Reporting level Temporal scale Biogeographic Region Monitoring Regional cooperation |
| topic_facet | MSFD Reporting level Temporal scale Biogeographic Region Monitoring Regional cooperation |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/41051 |
| visible | 1 |