Autor(es): Paulo, Siri ; Abrantes, Ana M. ; Xavier, Mariana ; Brito, Ana Filipa ; Teixo, Ricardo ; Coelho, Ana ; Paula, Anabela ; Carrilho, Eunice ; Botelho, Maria Filomena ; Marto, Carlos Miguel ; Ferreira, Manuel Marques
Data: 2023
Identificador Persistente: https://hdl.handle.net/10316/113401
Origem: Estudo Geral - Universidade de Coimbra
Assunto(s): endodontic treatment; sealing ability; microleakage; temporary material; nuclear medicine
(1) Background: Coronal microleakage can lead to endodontic treatment failure. This study aimed to compare the sealing ability of different temporary restorative materials used during endodontic treatment. (2) Methods: Eighty sheep incisors were collected, uniformized in length, and access cavities were performed, except for in the negative control group, where the teeth were left intact. The teeth were divided into six different groups. In the positive control group, the access cavity was made and left empty. In the experimental groups, access cavities were restored with three different temporary materials (IRM®, Ketac™ Silver, and Cavit™) and with a definitive restorative material (Filtek Supreme™). The teeth were submitted to thermocycling, and two and four weeks later, they were infiltrated with 99mTcNaO4, and nuclear medicine imaging was performed. (3) Results: Filtek Supreme™ obtained the lowest infiltration values. Regarding the temporary materials, at two weeks, Ketac™ Silver presented the lowest infiltration, followed by IRM®, whereas Cavit™ presented the highest infiltration. At four weeks, Ketac™ Silver remained with the lowest values, whereas Cavit™ decreased the infiltration, comparable to IRM®. (4) Conclusion: Regarding temporary materials, Ketac™ Silver had the lowest infiltration at 2 and 4 weeks, whereas the highest infiltration was found in the Cavit™ group at two weeks and in the IRM® group at 4 weeks.
