Publicação

Assessment of able-bodied and amputee cyclists’ aerodynamics by computational fluid dynamics

Ver documento

Detalhes bibliográficos
Resumo:The aim of this study was to compare the aerodynamics of able-bodied and amputee cyclists by computational fluid dynamics. The cyclists’ geometry was obtained by a 3D scanner. Three CAD models were created as able-bodied, transtibial (Tt), and transradial (Tr) amputees. Numerical simulations were conducted up to 13 m/s with increments of 1 m/s to assess drag force. The drag ranged between 0.36 and 39.25 N for the ablebodied model, 0.36–43.78 for the Tr model and 0.37–41.39 N for the Tt model. The pressure drag ranged between 0.20 and 22.94 N for the normal model, 0.21–28.61 for the Tr model and 0.23–28.02 N for the Tt model. The viscous drag ranged between 0.16 and 15.31 N for the normal model, 0.15–15.17 for the Tr model and 0.14–13.38 N for the Tt model. The rolling resistance (RR) was higher on the able-bodied (2.23 N), followed by the Tr (2.20 N) and Tt (2.17 N) models. As a conclusion, the able-bodied cyclist showed less drag, followed by the Tt and Tr models, respectively. The RR presented higher values in the able-bodied, followed by the Tr and Tt models.
Autores principais:Forte, Pedro
Outros Autores:Morais, J.E.; Barbosa, Tiago M.; Marinho, D.A.
Assunto:Cycling Amputee Drag Rolling resistance CFD
Ano:2021
País:Portugal
Tipo de documento:artigo
Tipo de acesso:acesso aberto
Instituição associada:Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
Idioma:inglês
Origem:Biblioteca Digital do IPB
Descrição
Resumo:The aim of this study was to compare the aerodynamics of able-bodied and amputee cyclists by computational fluid dynamics. The cyclists’ geometry was obtained by a 3D scanner. Three CAD models were created as able-bodied, transtibial (Tt), and transradial (Tr) amputees. Numerical simulations were conducted up to 13 m/s with increments of 1 m/s to assess drag force. The drag ranged between 0.36 and 39.25 N for the ablebodied model, 0.36–43.78 for the Tr model and 0.37–41.39 N for the Tt model. The pressure drag ranged between 0.20 and 22.94 N for the normal model, 0.21–28.61 for the Tr model and 0.23–28.02 N for the Tt model. The viscous drag ranged between 0.16 and 15.31 N for the normal model, 0.15–15.17 for the Tr model and 0.14–13.38 N for the Tt model. The rolling resistance (RR) was higher on the able-bodied (2.23 N), followed by the Tr (2.20 N) and Tt (2.17 N) models. As a conclusion, the able-bodied cyclist showed less drag, followed by the Tt and Tr models, respectively. The RR presented higher values in the able-bodied, followed by the Tr and Tt models.